ˇ
1390 J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 114, No. 3, 2010
Zabka et al.
(Figure 6) going from the reactants through a shallow minimum
3(CH4-N+) and a transition state at -3.74 eV to a deep
minimum of the triplet complex 3(CH3-NH+) (-7.34 eV) and
directly to the isomer CD2N+ by the release of D2. (2) The
product DCN+ results from secondary decomposition of the
products CDND+ or CD2N+. (3) A small amount of the product
3
+
to the products (CHNH+) + H2 with overall exothermicity of
CD3 is formed, besides the previously described prevailing
-4.10 eV (pathway A). The deep minimum is consistent with
the formation of the long-lived complex. The other possibility,
which is consistent with the formation of a long-lived complex,
formation by hydride-ion transfer, by decomposition of a long-
lived intermediate [CD2ND]+.
1
is pathway A′ leading to singlet (CHNH+) via subsequent
Acknowledgment. It is a great pleasure to dedicate this
article to W. Carl Lineberger, an old friend and respected
colleague, in appreciation of his numerous contributions to
the development of molecular and chemical physics. Partial
support of the experimental research by the Grant Agency
of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (grant
no. IA400400702) and of the theoretical calculations by the
MinistryofEducationoftheCzechRepublic(MSM0021620857)
is gratefully acknowledged.
shake-off of two H-atoms (pathway A′ via intermediates
3
3(CH3-NH+) or (CH2-NH2+)).
The formation of D2CN+ via the short-lived complex can be
connected to pathway B, leading to the triplet intermediate
CH4-N+ at -4.67 eV and from it to the products CH2N+
(triplet) + H2 at -4.08 eV. The shallow minimum on this
pathway, 0.59 eV below the energy of the products, suggests a
short-lived intermediate.
A simple rough estimation of the mean lifetimes of the two
complexes, τ (in seconds), using the RRK model in the form τ
) 1/k ≈ 10-13(E - E0/E)1-s (where E is the total energy of the
complex, E0 is the barrier for decomposition of the intermediate
toward the reactants, and s is the number of internal degrees of
freedom of the intermediate) and the available energetics from
Figure 6 lead to the ratio of the two mean lifetimes τL/τS )
10-20, which is in general agreement with the experimental
findings (lifetime of the long-lived complex, τL, of more or much
more that six average rotations vs lifetime of the short-lived
complex, τS, of about one average rotation).
References and Notes
(1) Cravens, T. E.; Vann, J.; Clark, J.; Yu, J.; Keller, C. N.; Brull, C.
AdV. Space Res. 2004, 33, 212, and references cited therein.
(2) Waite, J. H., Jr.; Cravens, T. E.; Ip, W.-H.; Kasprzak, W. T.;
Luhmann, J. G.; McNutt, R. L.; Niemann, H. B.; Yelle, R. V.; Mueller-
Wodarg, I.; Ledvina, S. A.; Scherer, S. Science 2005, 307, 1260.
(3) Cravens, T. E.; Robertson, I. P.; Waite, J. H.; Yelle, R. V.; Kasprzak,
W. T.; Keller, C. N.; Ledvina, S. A.; Niemann, H. B.; Luhmann, J. G.;
McNutt, R. L.; Ip, W.-H.; De La Haye, V.; Mueller-Wodarg, I.; Wahlund,
J.-E.; Anicich, V. G.; Vuitton, V. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2006, 33, L07105.
(4) Vuitton, V.; Yelle, R. V.; Anicich, V. G. Astrophys. J. 2006, 647,
L175. and references therein.
(5) Anicich, V. G.; Huntress, W. T.; Futrell, J. H. Chem. Phys. Lett.
1977, 47, 488.
(6) Smith, D.; Adams, N. G.; Miller, T. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1978, 69,
308.
(7) Tichy´, M.; Rakshit, A. B.; Lister, D. G.; Twiddy, N. D.; Adams,
N. G.; Smith, D. Int. J. Mass Spectrom Ion Phys. 1979, 29, 231.
(8) Dheandhanoo, N. G.; Johnsen, R.; Biondi, M. A. Planet. Space
Sci. 1984, 32, 1301.
(9) McEwan, M. J.; Scott, G. B. I.; Anicich, V. G. Int. J. Mass Spectrom
Ion Processes 1998, 172, 209–219.
This reasoning leads us to the conclusion that two different
isomers D2CN+ can be formed in reaction 2 by the decomposi-
tion of different intermediates: the decomposition of a long-
lived intermediate complex leads to the product CHNH+ via
the pathways A and A′ on the potential-energy surfaces, whereas
the decomposition of a short-lived complex leads to CH2N+
isomer via pathway B. On average, the product CH2N+ will
have more energy in translation, although both channels have
about the same exothermicity (-4.08 vs -4.10 and -4.28 eV
for pathway A′).
(10) Kusunoki, I.; Ottinger, C. J. Chem. Phys. 1979, 70, 699.
(11) Kusunoki, I.; Ottinger, C. J. Chem. Phys. 1979, 70, 710.
(12) Alcaraz, C.; Nicolas, C.; Thissen, R.; Zabka, J.; Dutuit, O. J. Phys.
ˇ
The product HCN+ evidently results from secondary decom-
Chem. A 2004, 108, 9998.
(13) Herman, Z. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 212, 413.
3
3
position of the reaction products [CH2-N]+ and [CHNH]+
ˇ
(14) Zabka, J.; Dolejsˇek, Z.; Hrusˇa´k, J.; Herman, Z. Int. J. Mass
by the dissociation of one of the hydrogen atoms; evidently,
Spectrom. Ion Processes 1999, 185/186/187, 195.
(15) Tully, J. C.; Herman, Z.; Wofgang, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 54,
1730.
(16) Friedrich, B.; Herman, Z. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1984,
49, 570.
(17) Vosko, S. H.; Wilk, L.; Nusair, M. Can. J. Phys. 1980, 58, 1200.
(18) Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. ReV. B 1988, 37, 785.
(19) Miehlich, B.; Savin, A.; Stoll, H.; Preuss, H. Chem. Phys. Lett.
1989, 157, 200.
(20) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.;
Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.;
Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.;
Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.;
Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li,
X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.;
Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.;
Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.;
Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels,
A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.;
Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.;
Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G. Liashenko, A.; Piskorz,
P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.;
Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson,
B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 03,
revision C.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2004.
only [HCN+] can be formed from the former, whereas from
2
the latter two isomers, 2[HCN+] and 2[CNH+], may be formed.
Subsequent splitting-off of three H atoms is possible but
presumably less likely because of the endothermicity of the
process.
Finally, theoretical calculations justify the possibility of the
+
formation of CH3 via a long-lived complex, as observed in
+
the experiments. Pathway C leading to the products CH3
+
3[NH] (at -3.91 eV) goes through a deep minimum of the
intermediate [CH3NH]+ that makes the formation of a long-
3
lived intermediate possible.
Conclusions
(1) Scattering experiments showed that the formation of
D2CN+ in the reaction of N+(3P) with CD4 involves two types
of intermediate complexes having different mean lifetimes. The
comparison with theoretical calculations of stationary points on
the respective hypersurface showed that the decomposition of
the long-lived statistical complex proceeds via the formation
of intermediates (CD4N+) and more stable isomers (CD3ND+)
and (CD2ND2+) and by the release of D2 or by the subsequent
release of two D atoms leading preferentially to the isomer
CDND+ (∼30% of the total amount of the product D2CN+).
The decomposition of the short-lived complex (CD4N+) leads
(21) Gonzalez, C.; Schlegel, H. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 2154.
(22) Gonzalez, C.; Schlegel, H. B. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 5523.
(23) Friedrich, B.; Herman, Z. Chem. Phys. 1982, 69, 433–442.
ˇ
(24) Zabka, J.; Dutuit, O.; Dolejsˇek, Z.; Pola´ch, J.; Herman, Z. Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys. 2000, 2, 781.
(25) Lias, S. G.; Bartmess, J. E.; Liebmann, J. F.; Holmes, J. L.; Levin,
R. D.; Mallard, W. C. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, Suppl. 1.