1 6 1023 M codeine, voltage range 0.7 to 1.3 V, step potential
0.0024 V and a scan rate of 0.01 V s21
Knight (NMR and ICP-MS), Dr Kevin Welham (MS) and Mr
Mike Bailey (flow cell fabrication), for their assistance with this
investigation.
.
Other groups report that when employing [Ru(bipy)3]2+ 2 doped
silicate sol–gel films, irreproducible ECL signals are obtained;
demonstrating an overall trend of decreasing signal with time; an
observation that can be attributed to leaching of the CL reagent.17
However, by covalently immobilising the CL reagent within a
silicate sol–gel, reproducible ECL signals of 7.7 mV (% RSD =
1.07, n = 24) were obtained. Although the ECL signals obtained are
not as great as those for the functionalised CPG 12, we are
currently investigating the incorporation of a greater proportion
of 4,49-bis[(3-triethoxysilylpropyl)amide]-2,29-bipyridine]bis(2,29-
bipyridine)ruthenium(II) dichloride 3 into the silicate sol–gels in
order to attain higher sensitivities.
Notes and references
{ To confirm covalent immobilisation of complex 3 into the silicate sol–gel
matrix, monoliths were prepared and stored in a range of commonly
employed solvent systems, including borate buffer (pH 8.5), phosphate
buffer (pH 7.0), aq. sulfuric acid (0.01 M) and acetonitrile; no leaching has
been observed over a period of 8 months.
1 D. M. Hercules and F. E. Lytle, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1966, 88, 4745.
2 R. D. Gerardi, N. W. Barnett and S. W. Lewis, Anal. Chem. Acta, 1999,
378, 1.
3 R. D. Geradi, N. W. Barnett and P. Jones, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1999, 388,
1.
4 W. L. Wallace and A. J. Bard, J. Phys. Chem., 1979, 83, 1350.
5 M. M. Collinson and B. Novak, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., 2002, 23, 215.
6 L. L. Schultz, J. S. Stoyanoff and T. A. Neiman, Anal. Chem., 1996, 68,
349.
7 H. Wang, G. Xu and S. Dong, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1992, 261, 64.
8 N. W. Barnett, R. Bos, H. Brand, P. Jones, K. F. Lim, S. D. Purcell and
R. A. Russell, Analyst, 2002, 127, 455.
In summary, compared to the physical entrapment of CL
reagents in silicate sol–gels, covalent immobilisation is advanta-
geous as it ensures homogeneous distribution of the reagent within
the matrix while preventing reagent leaching; resulting in reduced
analysis costs, reproducible analyte responses and extended sensor
lifetimes.
In conclusion, by synthesising a compound that acts as both a
ruthenium ligand and a hydrolysable linker, we have demonstrated
a simple and efficient technique for the covalent immobilisation of
a tris(bipyridyl)ruthenium derivative 3, suitable for employment in
both CL and ECL systems. In comparison to adsorption or
entrapment of the CL reagent, covalent immobilisation is
advantageous as no leaching is observed, leading to increased
reproducibility and sensor lifetime. This approach to immobilisa-
tion allows the CL reagent to be readily recycled, which is vital for
in situ sensor measurements. In addition to the applications
9 T. M. Downey and T. A. Nieman, Anal. Chem., 1992, 64, 261.
10 A. J. Tudos, J. J. Ozinga, H. Poppe and W. Th. Kok, Anal. Chem.,
1990, 62, 367.
11 C. Malins, S. Fanni, H. G. Glever, J. G. Vos and B. D. MacCraith,
Anal. Commun., 1999, 36, 3.
12 (a) N. W. Barnett, T. A. Bowser, R. D. Gerardi and B. Smith, Anal.
Chim. Acta, 1996, 318, 309; (b) G. M. Greenway, A. W. Knight and
P. J. Knight, Analyst, 1995, 120, 2459.
13 C. L. Donnici, D. H. M. Filho, L. L. C. Moreira, G. teixeira dos Reis,
E. S. Cordeiro, I. M. Ferreira de Oliveira, S. Carvalho and E. B. Paniago,
J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 1998, 9, 455.
14 A. Franville, D. Zambon and R. Mahiou, Chem. Mater., 2000, 12, 428.
15 G. Sprintschnik, H. W. Sprintschnik, P. P. Kirsch and D. G. Whitten,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1977, 4947.
16 B. A. Gorman, N. W. Barnett and R. Bos, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2005, 541,
117.
described
herein,
4,49-bis[(3-triethoxysilylpropyl)amide]-2,29-
bipyridine]bis(2,29-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) dichloride 3 could also
be employed for the functionalisation of other silica substrates
such as glass coils, micro channels, optical fibres and nanosensors.
With these factors in mind, work is currently underway within
our laboratories to ascertain the effect of 4,49-bis[(3-triethoxysilyl-
propyl)amide]-2,29-bipyridine]bis(2,29-bipyridine)ruthenium(II)
dichloride 3 concentration on the working range and detection
limits of the ECL technique.
17 T. M. Butler, B. D. MacCraith and C. McDonagh, J. Non-Cryst. Solids,
1998, 224, 249.
18 I. Gill and A. Ballesteros, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 8587.
19 I. Rubinstein and A. J. Bard, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1980, 102, 6642.
20 Y. Zhang and H. Ju, Electroanalysis, 2004, 16, 1401.
21 M. Plaschke, R. Czolk, J. Reichert and H. J. Ache, Thin Solid Films,
1996, 279, 233.
This work was financially supported by the RSC (A. G.). We
are grateful to, Mrs. Brenda Worthington (NMR), Mr Bob
22 J.-K. Lee, S.-H. Lee, M. Kim, H. Kim, D.-H. Kim and W.-Y. Lee,
Chem. Commun., 2003, 1602.
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006
Chem. Commun., 2006, 85–87 | 87