Figure 4. DA bonding in the (1)(TCNE)2 cocrystal lattice. Dashed
distances are in Å. Top and bottom views are orthogonal perspec-
tives about the horizontal axis.
Figure 5. (above) HOMO of 1 and (below) LUMO of TCNE as
calculated by AM1.
Å shorter than the van der Waals radii sum and clearly
represent DA attractions in the lattice between N-oxide and
TCNE functional groups that we shall refer to as DA bonds.
The DA bond orientations are similar to those previously
found in azodioxide/TCNE13 and pyrazine dioxide/TCNE4a,b
arrays in which the p-orbital axis of the N-oxide orients
parallel to the CdC bond of TCNE. This geometry is
favorable for HOMO/LUMO orbital overlap, which appears
to play a significant structural role, along with dipolar
coulombic attractions, in the N-O‚‚‚TCNE DA bonding.
Figure 5 shows the HOMO of 1 and LUMO of TCNE as
calculated by AM1.
oxygen located to one end of the CdC linkage. In both DA
bond geometries, constructive FMO overlap is apparent. The
presence of two different DA interaction geometries in the
(1)(TCNE)2 cocrystal may be caused by the different
molecular environments of the ortho and meta NO groups
or by other intermolecular close-packing constraints in the
lattice. The “loose” DA bonds will have soft potentials that
allow them to undergo distortion in response to other
energetically demanding features of molecular packing. We
speculate that the “slipped” DA bonds of the (1)(TCNE)2
lattice may result from a collapse or relaxation of the (DA2)n
grid network that would, were it composed of only rigid
bisected DA links, otherwise be strained as a result of porous
structure. Of course, optimum interlayer packing may also
influence the DA2 grid structure and, in turn, the observed
DA bond geometries. Although it seems reasonable to
assume that the bisected NO‚‚‚TCNE bond would be
electronically preferred to the slipped one, there is no
compelling evidence at this time to support this conjecture.
In fact, there is more literature precedence for the slipped
NO‚‚‚TCNE bond geometry.4a,b,13
The ortho and meta NO groups of 1 bind to TCNE with
slightly different geometries. The “bisected” ortho NO‚‚‚
TCNE and “slipped” meta NO‚‚‚TCNE linkages are depicted
below with FMO overlap. Both DA bonds have short 2.7 Å
(6) For preliminary reports of heterocyclic N-oxide CH‚‚‚O hydrogen
bonding in crystal lattices, see: (a) Taylor, R.; Kennard, O. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1982, 104, 5063. (b) Bodige, S. G.; Zottola, M. A.; McKay, S. E.;
Blackstock, S. C. Cryst. Eng. 1998, 1, 243.
(7) MacDonald, J. C.; Bishop, G. G.; Mazurek, M. Tetrahedron 1976,
32, 655.
noncovalent NO‚‚‚CdC lengths and parallel oxygen p-
orbital, TCNE CdC bond orientations. For the ortho
NO‚‚‚TCNE bond, a cyclic DA interaction between the oxide
oxygen and the two carbons of the CdC linkage occurs with
a “bisected” topology that could be described, in Dewar-
Zimmerman terms,12 as an ω2a + π2s Mo¨bius aromatic
pericyclic array. For the meta NO‚‚‚TCNE bond a “slipped”
version of the DA interaction is observed, with the oxide
(8) Karmas, G.; Spoerri, P. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 1580.
(9) Constable, E. C.; Morris, D.; Carr, S. New J. Chem. 1998, 287.
(10) Benesi, H. A.; Hildebrand, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71, 2703.
(11) Monoclinic C2/c lattice: a ) 18.1957(6), b ) 10.0687(1), c )
18.1772(6) Å and R ) γ ) 90°, â ) 118.699(2)°. Data/parameter ) 2522/
227, structure refinement on F2 gave R1 (I > 2σ(I)) ) 0.0514, wR2 ) 0.1074.
See Supporting Information for complete details.
(12) (a) Zimmerman, H. E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1971, 4, 272. (b) Dewar,
M. J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1971, 10, 761.
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 9, 2000
1183