bearing the leaving group. A number of general trends and
notable features merit additional discussion.
Primary allylic carbonates having internal disubstituted
carbon-carbon double bonds selectively provided the linear
alkylation products (entries 1-6). This mode of regioselec-
tivity corresponds to that expected of palladium catalysts but
is opposite to that typically observed for ruthenium, molyb-
1,14
denum, rhodium, and iridium catalysts. The (Z)-carbonate
b (entry 2) underwent substitution to give the less stable
Z)-product with little isomerization to the (E)-isomer. This
5
(
2 2
Figure 3. Retention of configuration in the [Rh(CO) Cl] -catalyzed
result is significant because (Z)-allylic substrates generally
suffer extensive ZfΕ isomerization with other transition
metal catalysts, although there are scattered reports of
Z-selective allylic substititutions of (Z)-substrates catalyzed
allylic substitution.
from those previously studied because the termini of the
allylic moieties are unequally substituted. Mechanistic studies
are underway to understand the origin of the regiochemistry
by iridium,10 palladium, and tungsten. Alkylation of 5e
illustrates that enol ethers conjugated with the allylic subunit
do not adversely affect the regiochemistry or efficiency of
the reaction (entry 5). That 5f underwent (entry 6) any
alkylation is noteworthy because 2,3,3-trisubstituted allylic
carbonates are inert to the modified Wilkinson’s catalyst
reported by Evans and typically require forcing conditions
with other transition metal catalysts.1 The isomeric tertiary
allylic carbonate 5g underwent facile alkylation to provide
the product of direct substitution, even though a quaternary
center was generated in the process (entry 7).
15
16
2 2
in [Rh(CO) Cl] -catalyzed allylic alkylations and why it
differs from such reactions promoted by other transition metal
catalysts. Of particular interest is determining whether the
rhodium-stabilized allyl intermediate resembles a (σ + π)
enyl complex as suggested by Evans or some other π-allyl
1,17
1
1
variant.
To determine the stereochemical outcome of [Rh(CO)
catalyzed allylic substitutions, the allylic carbonate (+)-8 was
synthesized in g99% ee in two steps from the correspond-
ing racemic alcohol via Sharpless kinetic resolution (Figure
2
2
Cl] -
20
Preliminary results with secondary allylic carbonates and
acetates 5h-k (entries 8-11) underscore the differences
between the reactivity of [Rh(CO) Cl] and other catalysts
2 2
capable of promoting allylic substitutions. In each of these
cases, direct displacement of the leaving group is the
dominant reaction pathway. This appears to be true even
when the substituents at both ends of the allylic moiety are
sterically and electronically similar (entry 10) or when
conjugation would favor substitution at the opposite allylic
3
). When (+)-8 was allowed to react with the sodium salt
of dimethyl malonate in the presence of [Rh(CO) Cl] , (+)-9
was obtained in 93% yield and 98% ee (regioselectivity )
2
2
20
10
1
4
21
11
9
3:7). Like Pd, Ru, Mo, Rh, and Ir catalysts, [Rh(CO)
Cl] thus appears to catalyze substitutions of secondary allylic
carbonates with net retention of configuration.
We have thus demonstrated that [Rh(CO) Cl]
2
-
2
2
2
has the
remarkable propensity to catalyze allylic substitutions at the
carbon atom bearing the leaving group on substrates with a
variety of substitution patterns. The following question now
arises: How can this unusual reactivity be exploited in
synthesis? We are currently pursuing this query on a number
of fronts. For example, that allylic substitutions of (Z)-alkenes
proceed with retention of double-bond geometry suggests
2 2
terminus (entry 11). Finally, [Rh(CO) Cl] may be used
effectively to catalyze the alkylation of propargylic carbon-
ates to give substituted alkynes with none of the allenic
product being observed (entry 12).
2 2
That [Rh(CO) Cl] catalyzes the allylic alkylations of
unsymmetrical substrates to give products in which substitu-
tion occurs at the carbon atom bearing the leaving group
may be regarded as a memory effect. Such phenomena have
been examined in palladium-catalyzed allylic alkylations of
enantioenriched and racemic secondary allylic substrates
having the same number of substituents on the allyl
2 2
that [Rh(CO) Cl] might be used to catalyze cyclizations to
give medium and large rings containing (Z)-olefins. The
synthesis of rings by transition metal-catalyzed cyclizations
has received considerable attention since the early 1980s.22
Inasmuch as the synthesis of eight-membered rings is
particularly demanding, we first examined whether eight-
1
8,19
moiety.
The nature of the memory effect observed in
Cl] -catalyzed allylic alkylations thus differs
these [Rh(CO)
2
2
membered lactones might be formed by [Rh(CO)
catalyzed cyclizations. In the event, treating the â-ketoester
10 with [Rh(CO) Cl] in DMF at 0 °C provided lactone 11
2 2
Cl] -
(
(
14) Bhatia, B.; Reddy, M. M.; Iqbal, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 6301.
15) (a) Huntzinger, M. W.; Oehlschlager, A. C. J. Org. Chem. 1991,
2
2
5
1
2
6, 2918. (b) Sjogren, M. P. T.; Hansson, S.; Akermark, B. Organometallics
994, 13, 1963. (c) Kazmaier, U.; Zumpe, F. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
000, 39, 802.
in 68% yield (Figure 4); none of the corresponding six-
membered lactone was observed. To the best of our
knowledge, this represents the first example of forming an
(16) Frisell, H.; Akermark, B. Organometallics 1995, 14, 561.
(17) (a) Takahashi, T.; Nemoto, H.; Tsuji, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983,
2
4, 2005. (b) Trost, B. M.; Lautens, M.; Chan, C.; Jebaratnam, J.; Mueller,
T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 636.
(20) Enantiomeric excess was determined by HPLC analysis with a chiral
stationary phase column [Chiracel OD or AD].
(21) Trost, B. M.; Lautens, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 1469.
(22) (a) Trost, B. M.; Verhoeven, T. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102,
4743. (b) Trost, B. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1989, 28, 1173. (c)
Trost, B. M.; Vos, B. A.; Brzezowski, C. M.; Martina, D. P. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1992, 33, 717.
(18) Poli, G.; Scolastico, C. Chemtracts: Org. Chem. 1999, 12, 837.
19) (a) Fiaud, J. C.; Malleron, J. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 1399.
(
(b) Trost, B. M.; Bunt, R. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 235. (c) Lloyd-
Jones, G. C.; Stephen, S. C.; Murray, M.; Butts, C. P.; Vyskocil, S.;
Kocovsky, P. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 4348. (d) Fairlamb, I. J. S.; Lloyd-
Jones, G. C.; Vyskocil, S.; Kocovsky, P. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 4443.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 8, 2004
1323