Z. Hricovíniová / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 22 (2011) 1184–1188
1187
difficult to separate from its stereoisomer
D
-sorbitol. Compared to
4.2. Hydrolysis of starch with sodium molybdate under
microwave irradiation
enzymatic production, chemical catalysis employing inexpensive
inorganic materials for the isomerization of reducing sugars could
offer attractive advantages. Utilizing an efficient catalytic system
and water as the solvent has many advantages as this approach
is environmentally friendly and inexpensive. Moreover, carbohy-
drates as water-soluble polar molecules, with high dielectric
losses, are suitable chemical systems for microwave irradiation.
They could be modified by this approach without the need for pro-
tection and deprotection steps. Furthermore, the high demands in
activation energy of the isomerization process can be completed in
a very short reaction time, which makes aqueous catalysis more
efficient. The application of this methodology provides an attrac-
tive aspect to the field of microwave-assisted metal-catalyzed
reactions in aqueous media.
Starch (500 mg) was dissolved in 0.25 M HCl (10 ml) and Na2-
MoO4Á2H2O (50 mg) was added to obtain a stock solution. The
sealed tubes (1 ml) were exposed to microwave irradiation
200 W for different lengths of time (10 s–5 min). Samples were
À
treated with Amberlite IRA-400 in the HCO3 form to remove the
catalyst. The reaction mixtures were analyzed by NMR spectros-
copy measurements and the ratio of starch/glucose/mannose was
determined by integration of selected resonances in the 1H NMR
spectra.
4.3. Hydrolysis of starch with sodium molybdate with
conventional heating
Starch (200 mg) was dissolved in 0.25 M HCl (4 ml) and Na2-
MoO4Á2H2O (20 mg) was added. The tube was sealed and heated
in an oil-bath at 90–95 °C for 40 h. Samples (0.3 ml) were taken
at selected intervals, and treated with Amberlite IRA-400 in the
3. Conclusion
We have developed a direct and convenient microwave assisted
one-pot protocol for the preparation of D-mannose from native
starch by a simple chemical process. Microwave irradiation in
combination with a catalytic amount of molybdate ions proved
to be an efficient method for the hydrolysis of starch and isomeri-
À
HCO3 form to remove the catalyst. The reaction mixture was ana-
lyzed by NMR spectroscopy measurements and the ratio of starch/
glucose/mannose was determined by integration of selected reso-
nances in the 1H NMR spectra.
zation of the obtained D-glucose to D-mannose. The nature of heat-
ing had a great impact on this transformation. The rate of starch
hydrolysis considerably increased under microwave irradiation.
In addition, the conversion of glucose to mannose in the subse-
quent isomerization step was much higher compared to conven-
tional heating. The short reaction times, good conversions in
combination with the easy performance and work-up make this
method attractive and also applicable on a semi-preparative scale.
In conclusion, we would like to point out that the application of
MoVI salts and microwave power for depolymerization of starch
leads to its complete hydrolysis and high conversion by means of
4.4. Typical procedure for starch hydrolysis under microwave
conditions on a semi-preparative scale
Potato starch (500 mg) was dissolved in 0.25 M HCl (10 ml) and
Na2MoO4Á2H2O (50 mg) was added. The sealed tube was exposed
to microwave irradiation for 3 min. The reaction mixture was also
treated batch-wise with an excess of the cation/anion ion-ex-
change resin, filtered off, washed with water and the combined fil-
trates were evaporated. The syrupy residue was fractionated by
column chromatography on Dowex 50W X8 (200–400 mesh) in
Ba2+ form with water as eluent. Fractionization of the syrupy resi-
D
-glucose and D-mannose content.
due afforded
33%).
D-glucose (0.325 g, 65%) and D-mannose (0.165 g,
4. Experimental
4.1. General methods
4.5. Reduction of
D-mannose to
D-mannitol
All starches used were purchased from commercial suppliers.
Microwave reactions were performed in a multimode microwave
reactor CEM Discover consisting of a continuous focused micro-
wave power delivery system with operator-selectable power from
0 to 300 W; microwave frequency source of 2.45 GHz. The reac-
tions were performed in sealed glass tubes and were stirred mag-
netically. Conversions and the purities of the products were
determined by NMR spectroscopy. High-resolution NMR spectra
were recorded in a 5 mm cryoprobe on Varian 600 VNMRS spec-
trometer. The experiments were carried out at 25 °C in D2O. The
proton and carbon chemical shifts were referenced to external
TSP. One-dimensional 1H and 13C NMR spectra as well as two-
dimensional COSY and HSQC were used to determine 1H and 13C
chemical shifts.
To a solution of
D
-mannose (1.0 g) in water (15 ml) was added
an aqueous solution of sodium borohydride (0.2 g in 5 ml H2O).
The reaction mixture was kept at room temperature for 2 h. When
the reduction was complete the reaction mixture was acidified
with a drop of acetic acid, deionized with cation/anion ion-
exchange resin and evaporated to dryness. Crystallization from
methanol afforded
D
-mannitol (780 mg; 78%). Mp 165–166 °C;
[a]D = +23.7?+24.5 (c 10, Na2B4O7), 24 h, which was in accordance
with the literature.40
Acknowledgement
This research was supported by VEGA Grant 2/0087/11 and SP
Grant 2003SP200280203.
Optical rotations were determined at 20 °C with an automatic
polarimeter Perkin–Elmer Model 141 using a 10 cm, 1-ml cell.
Melting points were measured on a Kofler hotstage microscope.
Separations of the free sugars were accomplished by column chro-
matography on Dowex 50W X8 resin (Sigma–Aldrich) in the Ba2+
form (200–400 mesh). Paper chromatography was performed by
the descending method on the Whatman No. 1 paper using ethyl
acetate–pyridine–water (8:2:1) as the mobile phase. The chro-
matograms were made visible by means of alkaline silver nitrate.
All chemicals were reagent grade and used without further
purification.
References
1. Anastas, P. T.; Warner, J. C. Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice; Oxford
University Press: Oxford, UK, 2000.
2. Belgacem, M. N.; Gandini, A. Monomers, Polymers and Composites from
Renewable Resources; Elsevier, 2008. pp 321–342.
3. Röper, H. Starch/Staerke 2002, 54, 89–99.
4. Tomasik, P.; Schilling, C. H. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 2004, 59, 175–403.
5. Staroszczyk, H.; Tomasik, P.; Janas, P.; Poreda, A. Carbohydr. Polym. 2007, 69,
299–304.
6. Chakraborty, S.; Sahoo, B.; Teraoka, I.; Miller, L. M.; Gross, R. A. Macromolecules
2005, 38, 61–68.