Marcella Bonchio et al.
COMMUNICATIONS
processes, RuO4 is usually generated in situ by reaction Acknowledgements
of RuCl3 or RuO2 with NaIO4, HIO4, NaOCl or NaBrO3.
[1,14] These reactions are carried out in a biphasic medium
and require a delicate balance of a solvent mixture:
usually CCl4, CH3CN and water to prevent catalyst
deactivation. It is therefore difficult to correlate the
catalyst efficiency under so diverse conditions, but for
the sake of comparison AdH hydroxylation mediated by
RuO4 has been reported to proceed with ca. 60%
conversion in 19 h.[14a]
Financial support from Italian National Research Council is
gratefully acknowledged. This work has been done in the frame
of Cost D12 WG ™New Catalysts for environmentally friendly
oxidations with H2O2 or O2∫.
References
[1] a) W. P. Griffith, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1992, 21, 179 185;
b) T. Naota, H. Takaya, S.-I. Murahashi, Chem. Rev.
1998, 98, 2599 2660; c) A. E. Shilov, G. B. Shul×pin,
Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 2879 2932.
Although precise mechanistic information remains to
be acquired in order to address the nature of active
oxidant, our results extend the protocol for the use of
2,6-dichloropyridine N-oxide as primary oxidant, which
represent an attractive alternative to both peroxidic and
halogenated oxidants. The fact that its reduction
product is recovered unaltered and potentially recycled
makes it a valuable tool to activate hydrogen peroxide
overcoming the problem of catalase-like induced
decomposition and radical reactions. Both aspects are
fundamental for lowering the environmental ∫E∫ factor
of the oxidation process.[15]
Work in progress aims at finding an access to rapid Ru-
mediated hydroxylation with polyoxometalate-based
systems, thus mimicking the perfluoroporphyrin behav-
iour with highly robust, environmentally benign cata-
lysts.
[2] a) J. T. Groves, R. Quinn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107,
5790 5792; b) R. Neumann, M. Dahan, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 11969 11976 and references therein.
[3] a) J. T. Groves, M. Bonchio, T. Carofiglio, K. Shalyaev, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8961 8962; b) T. Shingaki, K.
Miura, T. Higuchi, M. Hirobe, T. Nagano, Chem.
Commun. 1997, 861 862 and references therein.
[4] A. Dijksman, A. Marino-Gonzalez, A. M. I. Payeras,
I. W. C. E. Arends, R. A. Sheldon, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 6826 6833.
[5] L. Gonsalvi, I. W. C. E. Arends, R. A. Sheldon,
Chem.Commun. 2000, 202 203.
[6] J. L. Zhang, H. B. Zhou, J. S. Huang, C. M. Che, Chem.
Eur. J. 2002, 8, 1554 1562.
[7] a) M. T. Pope, A. Muller, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
1991, 30, 34 48; b) C. L. Hill, C. M. Prosser-McCharta,
Coord.
Chem.
Rev.
1995,
143,
407 455;
c) Polyoxometalates, (Ed.: C. L. Hill), Chem. Rev.
(Special Issue) 1998, 98, 1 390.
[8] A. Bagno, M. Bonchio, A. Sartorel, G. Scorrano Eur. J.
Inorg. Chem. 2000, 17 20.
Experimental Section
[9] V. Artero, A. Proust, P. Herson, P. Gouzerh, Chem. Eur.
J. 2001, 7, 3901 3910.
[10] R. Villaneau, R. Delmont, A. Proust, P. Gouzerh, Chem.
Eur. J. 2000, 6, 1184 1192.
General Oxidation Procedure
Oxidation reactions were carried out (duplicate runs) by
dissolving [AdH] 0.071 mol LÀ in distilled 1,2-dichloro-
1
[11] R. A. Sheldon, J. K. Kochi, Metal catalysed oxidation of
organic compounds Academic Press, New York, 1981.
[12] G. E. Chivers, H. Suschitzky, J. Chem. Soc. D. 1971, 28.
[13] a) C. R¸chardt, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1970, 9,
830 843; b) D. H. R. Barton, J. Boivin, W. B. Mother-
well, N. Ozbalik, K. M. Schwartzentruber, Nouv. J. Chim.
1986, 10, 387 398.
[14] a) J. M. Bakke, J. E. Braenden Acta Chem. Scand. 1991,
45, 418 423; b) J. M. Bakke, D. Bethell, Acta Chem.
Scand. 1992, 46, 644-649.
ethane (1 mL) together with 2,6-dichloropyridine N-oxide
(1 3 equivalents vs. AdH), a GC internal standard (C16H34),
the rutheniumcatalyst (2 8% v s. AdH based on ruthenium
amount) and 37% aqueous HCl (2 mL). The reaction mixture
was then thermostatted at 808C. Products were identified by
GC (HP 5890 series II instrument equipped with a 15 m,
0.5 mm I.D, 0.25 m AT-1701 capillary column) and GC-MS (HP
5890 series II instrument equipped with HP 5970 Mass
selective detector and a 30 m, 0.25 mm I.D, 0.25 m EC-1
capillary column) analysis. Chemical yields and conversions
were determined by quantitative GC analysis with respect to
the internal standard.
¬
[15] R. A. Sheldon, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Serie IIc 2000, 3,
541 551.
844
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 841 844