1
1
1
stirred for 24 h at RT. Most of the DMF was removed in vacuo,
and the reaction mixture was taken up in EtOAc (30 mL), washed
with water (20 mL) and brine (20 mL), and dried. Solvent was
removed in vacuo and the crude was purified by flash chromatog-
raphy eluting with hexane/EtOAc (6:4) to provide 1.90 g of (7) as
a pale yellow oil (69.5% yield).
H NMR (CDCl3): δ 5.50 (m, 1H, 1 -H), 4.60 (m, 1H, 3 -H), 4.32
1 1 1 1
(m, 1H, 2 -H), 4.20 (m, 3H, 6 -H and 5 -H), 4.00 (m, 1H, 4 -H),
2.95 (m, 2H, 2-H), 2.75 (m, 1H, 3-H), 2.75 + 2.50 (m, 2H, 6-H),
2.05 + 1.70 (m, 2H, 4-H), 1.55 + 1.40 (m, 2H, 5-H), 1.40 (m, 21H,
Boc and ketals).
Nipecotic Acid D-Galactos-6′-yl Ester (5)sTo a solution of 9 (1.75
g, 3.71 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL), TFA (5 mL) was added, and the
mixture was stirred at RT for 2 h. Evaporation of the solvent gave
a residue that was taken up in water (20 mL), neutralized with
10% aqueous NH4OH, diluted with more water, and washed with
CHCl3 (3 × 15 mL). The aqueous layers were concentrated in
vacuo, and the crude was submitted to cation-exchange chroma-
tography, eluting with 10% pyridine in water to give 915 mg of 5
(84% yield) as pale yellow solid (mp 138-139 °C).
1
1
1
H NMR (CDCl3): δ 6.00 (m, 1H, 1 -H), 5.40 (m, 1H, 3 -H), 4.92
1
1
1
1
(
m, 1H, 2 -H), 4.60 (m, 2H, 6 -H), 4.15 (m, 2H, 4 -H and 5 -H),
4
.05 + 3.85 (m, 2H, 2-H); 3.65 + 2.75 (m, 2H, 6-H), 3.55 (m, 12H,
methyl carbonate groups), 2.55 (m, 1H, 3-H), 2.15 + 1.80 (m, 2H,
4
-H), 1.45 + 1.35 (m, 2H, 5-H), 1.20(m, 9H, Boc).
Nipecotic Acid D-glucos-6′-yl Ester (3)sTo a solution of 7 (1.90
g, 3.04 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL), 5 mL of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)
was added, and the mixture was stirred at RT for 2 h. Evaporation
of the solvent gave a residue that was poured into a saturated
solution of NaHCO3 (20 mL) and extracted with CHCl3 (3 × 15
mL). The organic layers were dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated
in vacuo. This material (1.5 g) was taken directly into the next
reaction without further purification. To a solution of crude (1.5
g) in MeOH (10 mL) was added K2CO3 (100 mg), and the mixture
was stirred at RT for 12 h. Evaporation of the solvent gave a
residue that was taken up in water and neutralized with 6 N
aqueous HCl, diluted with more water, and washed with CHCl3.The
aqueous layers were concentrated in vacuo, and the residue was
submitted to cation-exchange chromatography, eluting with 10%
pyridine in water to give 610 mg of (3) (69% yield) as a pale yellow
solid (mp 145-146 °C).
1
1
1
H NMR (D2O): δ 4.95 (m, 1H, 1 -H), 4.28 (m, 1H, 3 -H), 3.60
1
1
1
(m, 1H, 2 -H), 3.42 (m, 2H, 6 -H), 3.35 (m, 1H, 5 -H), 3.25 (m, 1H,
1
4 -H), 3.10 + 2.95 (m, 2H, 2-H), 2.80 (m, 2H, 6-H), 2.33 (m, 1H,
3-H), 1.75 + 1.65 (m, 2H, 4-H), 1.45 (m, 2H, 5-H).
1
3
1
C NMR (D2O + MeOD): δ 179.41 (sCOOR), 96.72 (C-1 ),
1
1
1
1
1
75.15 (C-3 ), 72.04 (C-2 ), 70.40 (C-5 ), 68.82 (C-4 ), 60.97 (C-6 ),
46.01 (C-2), 43.99 (C-6), 40.76 (C-3), 25.73 (C-4), 21.01 (C-5).
N-Boc-Nipecotic Acid N-Boc-L-Tyrosyl Ester (10)sCDI (0.71 g,
4.37 mmol) was added to a solution of 2 (1 g, 4.37 mmol) in CH2-
Cl /DMF (3:1, 50 mL), and the resulting mixture was stirred at
2
RT. After disappearance of the starting materials (determined by
thin-layer chromatography), N-Boc-L-tyrosine (1.11 g, 4.15 mmol)
in CH Cl /DMF (3:1, 150 mL) was added in a dropwise manner to
2
2
1
1
1
H NMR (D2O): δ 4.65 (m, 1H, 1 -H), 4.60 (m, 1H, 3 -H), 3.70
the mixture over 120 min, and stirring was then continued for 12
h. After evaporation of the solvent, the residue was taken up in
EtOAc (60 mL) and washed with water (2 × 30 mL). The organic
layer was dried on Na2SO4 and evaporated to give a residue (3 g)
that was submitted to flash chromatography, eluting with CHCl3/
MeOH/AcOH (95:4.5:0.5) to afford the title compound (10) as a
pale yellow oil (1.5 g, 71%).
1
1
1
1
(
m, 1H, 2 -H), 3.50 (m, 3H, 6 -H and 5 -C), 3.15 (m, 3H, 3 -C and
2
2
-H), 2.95 + 2.75 (m, 2H, 6H), 2.45 (m, 1H, 3-H), 1.90 + 1.65 (m,
H, 4-H), + 1.55 (m, 2H, 5-H).
1
3
1
C NMR (D2O + MeOD): δ 172 (-COOR), 96.84 (C-1 ), 76.86-
1
1
1
1
7
6
5
6.66 (C-3 ), 75.71 (C-2 ), 75.31-75.08 (C-5 ), 70.56 (C-4 ), 63.57-
3.33 (C-6 ), 48.78 (C-2), 45.02-44.91 (C-6), 39.57 (C-3), 26.63 (C-
1
1
1
1
), 21.98 (C-4).
H NMR (CDCl3): δ 6.85 (d, 2H J ) 7 Hz, 2 -H and 6 -H), 6.64
1 1
N-Boc Nipecotic Acid Diacetone-R-D-glucofuranos-3′-yl Ester (8)s
(d, 2H J ) 7 Hz, 3 -H and 5 -H), 4.91 (br, 1H, -NH-Boc), 4.45
1 1
To a stirred solution of N-Boc-nipecotic acid (2; 1 g, 4.36 mmol) in
CH2Cl2/DMF (9:1, 30 mL) was added CDI (706.97 mg, 4.36 mmol),
and the mixture was stirred for 1 h at RT. A solution of DAG (1.36
g, 5.23 mmol) in CH2Cl2/DMF (9:1, 30 mL) was added in a dropwise
manner and stirred for 24 h at RT. Most of the DMF was removed
in vacuo, and the reaction mixture was taken up in EtOAc (30
mL), washed with water (20 mL) and brine (20 mL), and dried.
Solvent was removed in vacuo, and the crude was purified by flash
chromatography, eluting with hexane/Et2O (8:2) to provide 1.34 g
of 8 as a white oil (65% yield).
(m, 1H, 8 -H), 4.15 + 3.80 (m, 2H, 2-H), 2.85 (m, 2H, 7 -H), 2.84
+ 2.75 (m, 2H, 6-H), 2.40 (m, 1H, 3-H), 2.00 + 1.43 (m, 2H, 4-H),
1.40 (m, 20H, 5-H and -Boc).
Nipecotic Acid L-Tyrosyl Ester (6)sTo a solution of 10 (1.75 g,
3.71 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL), TFA (5 mL) was added, and the
mixture was stirred at RT for 2 h. Evaporation of the solvent gave
a residue that was taken up in water (20 mL), neutralized with
10% aqueous NH4OH, diluted with more water, and washed with
CHCl3 (3 × 15 mL). The aqueous layers were concentrated in
vacuo, and the crude was submitted to cation-exchange chroma-
tography, eluting with 10% pyridine in water to give 760 mg of 6
(73% yield) as a white solid (mp 134-135 °C).
1
1
1
H NMR (CDCl3): δ 5.85 (m, 1H, 1 -H), 5.25 (m, 1H, 3 -H), 4.41
1
1
1
1
(
m, 1H, 2 -H), 4.15 (m, 3H, 6 -H and 5 -H), 4.05 (m, 1H, 4 -H),
1
1
1
3
2
.95 (m, 2H, 2-H), 2.85 + 2.72 (m, 2H, 6-H), 2.48 (m, 1H, 3-H),
H NMR (DMSO): δ 7.30 (d, 2H J ) 7 Hz, 2 -H and 6 -H), 7.20
1 1 1
.00 + 1.70 (m, 2H, 4-H), 1.70 + 1.55 (m, 2H, 5-H), 1.40 (m, 21H,
(d, 2H J ) 7 Hz, 3 -H and 5 -H), 4.00 (m, 1H, 7 -H), 3.50 + 3.30
1
-Boc and ketals).
(m, 2H, 2-H), 3.19 (m, 2H, 6 -H), 3.05 (m, 2H, 6-H), 2.95 + 1.82
Nipecotic Acid D-Glucos-3′-yl Ester (4)sTo a solution of (8; 1.34
(m, 2H, 4-H), 1.82 + 1.70 (m, 2H, 5-H).
1
3
g, 2.84 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was added TFA (5 mL), and the
mixture was stirred at RT for 12 h. Evaporation of the solvent
gave a residue that was taken up in water (20 mL) and neutralized
with 10% aqueous NH4OH, diluted with more water, and washed
with CHCl3 (3 × 15 mL). The aqueous layers were concentrated
in vacuo, and the residue was submitted to cation-exchange
chromatography, eluting with 10% pyridine in water to give 690
mg of 4 (84% yield) as a pale yellow solid (mp 135-136 °C).
C (DMSO): δ 173.50 (-COOH); 172.84 (-COOs), 156.35 (C-
1
1 1 1 1
4 ), 134.64 (C-1 ), 131.75-131.63 (C-2 and C-6 ), 116.79 (C-3 and
1
1
C-5 ), 55.87 (C-7 ), 44.96 (C-2), 44.84 (C-6), 39.20 (C-3), 36.31-
1
36.06 (C-6 ), 25.52 (C-5), 21.73 (C-4).
Ch em ica l Sta bilitysNipecotic ester solutions were prepared
by dissolving an aliquot of 3-6 in pH 7.4 phosphate buffer to give
-
5
a final concentration of ≈10 M. The solution was maintained at
37 °C, and aliquots were withdrawn every 2 h for the initial 12 h
of incubation and successively every 12 h for 7 days. The disap-
pearance of the nipecotic esters was followed by HPLC analysis
using the method reported later. Pseudo-first-order rate constants
for chemical hydrolysis were determined from slopes of linear plots
obtained by reporting the logarithm of residual nipecotic ester
against time. All experiments were carried out in triplicate.
En zym a tic Sta bilitysEnzymatic hydrolysis of nipecotic esters
(3-6) was determined using the procedure described in the
literature.18 Porcine liver esterase (obtained from Sigma) was
diluted 10 times with phosphate buffer and used to hydrolyze
nipecotic esters. Nipecotic ester solutions were prepared by
dissolving an aliquot of 3-6 in phosphate buffer to give a final
concentration of ≈10 M. The solution was maintained at 37 °C,
and 325 µL of porcine esterase were added to achieve a concentra-
tion of 1.3 U/mL. Aliquots of 300 µL were withdrawn every hour
for 16 h and combined with 600 µL of 0.01 N HCl in methanol.
After centrifugation at 5000 × g for 5 min, an aliquot of
supernatant was derivatized by the method reported later and
1
1
1
H NMR (D2O): δ (m, 1H, 1 -H), 4.41 (m, 1H, 3 -H), 3.65 (m,
1
1
1
1
4
1
H, 2 -H), 3.50 (m, 2H, 6 -H), 3.21 (m, 1H, 5 -H), 3.15 (m, 2H,
1
-H), 3.15 + 3.03 (m, 2H, 2-H), 2.90 + 2.81 (m, 2H, 6-H), 2.42 (m,
H, 3-H); 1.81 + 1.67 (m, 2H, 4-H), 1.51 (m, 2H, 5-H).
1
3
C NMR (D2O + MeOD): δ 180.03 (sCOOR), 97.17-93.30 (C-
11
6
), 77.96 (C-3 ), 77.06 (C-2 ), 75.44 (C-5 ), 70.85 (C-4 ), 61.87 (C-
), 48.53 (C-2), 46.78 (C-6), 39.44 (C-3), 26.60 (C-5), 22.01 (C-4).
N-Boc-Nipecotic Acid (1′,2′:3′,4′-diisopropylidene)-R-D-galacto-
1
1
1
1
1
pyranos-6′-yl Ester (9)sTo a stirred solution of N-Boc-nipecotic acid
(2; 1 g, 4.36 mmol) in CH2Cl2/DMF (9:1, 30 mL) was added CDI
(706 mg, 4.36 mmol), and the mixture was stirred for 1 h at RT.
A solution of DIPG (1.36 g, 5.23 mmol) in CH2Cl2/DMF (1:5, 30
mL) was added in a dropwise manner and stirred for 24 h at RT.
Most of the DMF was removed in vacuo, and the reaction mixture
was taken up in EtOAc (30 mL), washed with water (20 mL) and
brine (20 mL), and dried. Solvent was removed in vacuo, and the
crude was purified by flash chromatography eluting with hexane/
Et2O (8:2) to provide 1.75 g of 9 (85% yield) as a white oil.
-
5
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences / 563
Vol. 88, No. 5, May 1999