E. Blom et al.
a 50-fold excess of native biotin before adding any of the
labelled compounds 4–6 (Figure 2). The limited sensitivity of
the ultraviolet and radiodetectors precluded binding studies
at concentration levels corresponding to the KD of the native
biotin-avidin affinity (10-15M).
The binding of the biotin analogues might be high
enough to make them useful in labelling avidin-treated islets
of Langerhans.
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
biotin
4
5
6
Conclusion
Three 18F-labelled biotin analogues have been synthesised using
a one-step nucleophilic 18F-fluorination strategy. The labelled
compounds were obtained with a decay-corrected yield up to
35%, and the specific radioactivity for one of the 18F-labelled
compounds was 320GBq/mmol. All analogues could bind to
avidin in situ, as good as or to a slightly higher degree compared
with our previously prepared 68Ga-labelled biotin analogues, and
5–15% lower compared with native biotin. The binding of the
tracers will be further evaluated in vitro and in an in vivo evaluation
of the islet of Langerhans transplantation model.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
ligand/avidin
Figure 1. Saturation of the binding of biotin and nonradioactive compounds 4–6
to avidin in solution, as determined by HPLC analysis. The incubation was carried
out for 5minutes at room temperature. Data are presented as mean values (n=2).
100
80
Acknowledgement
60
non-blocked
Financial support from The Swedish Science Research Council
and Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF) (BL) is grate-
fully acknowledged. This work was conducted in collaboration
with Uppsala Imanet and Uppsala Applied Science Lab, GE
Healthcare.
40
blocked
20
0
4
5
6
References
-20
[1] E. A. Bayer, M. Wilchek, Methods Biochem. Anal. 1980, 26, 1–45.
[2] R. J. DeLange, T.-S. Huang, J. Biol. Chem. 1971, 246, 698–709.
[3] N. M. Green, Adv. Protein Chem. 1975, 29, 85–133.
[4] O. Livnah, E. A. Bayer, M. Wilchek, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993,
90, 5076–5080.
Compound
Figure 2. Percent binding of compounds 4–6 to avidin, blocked and nonblocked.
Data are presented as mean values (n=2).
[5] M. Wilcheck, E. A. Bayer, Anal. Biochem. 1988, 171, 1–32.
[6] G. Sabatino, M. Chinol, G. Paganelli, S. Papi, M. Chelli, G. Leone,
A. M. Papini, A. De Luca, M. Ginanneschi, J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46,
3170–3173.
[7] S.- C. Wu, S.- L. Wong, Protein Exp. Purif. 2006, 46, 268–273.
[8] A. M. J. Shapiro, J. R. T. Lakey, E. A. Ryan, G. S. Korbutt, E. Toth, G. L.
Warnock, N. M. Kneteman, R. V. Rajotte, N. Engl. J. Med. 2000, 343,
230–238.
[9] A. M. J. Shapiro, E. Hao, J. R. T. Lakey, J. F. Elliot, R. V. Rajotte, N. M.
Kneteman, Tranplant. Proc. 1998, 30, 647.
[10] B. W. Paty, S. Bonner-Weir, M. R. Laughlin, A. J. McEwan, A. M. J. Shapiro,
Transplantation 2004, 77, 1133–1137.
[11] C. Toso, H. Zaidi, P. Morel, M. Armanet, A. Andres, N. Pernin, R.
Baertschiger, D. Slosman, L. H. Buhler, D. Bosco, T. Berney, Transplan-
tation 2005, 79, 353–355.
[12] T. Eich, O. Eriksson, A. Sundin, S. Estrada, D. Brandhorst, H. Brandhorst,
B. Langstrom, B. Nilsson, O. Korsgren, T. Lundgren, Transplantation
2007, 84, 893–898.
therefore indirectly determine the amount of biotin-avidin
complex formed. The results of avidin-saturation experiments
with nonradioactive fluoro compounds 4–6 and native biotin
are shown in Figure 1. All analogues could bind to avidin. Native
biotin showed the highest binding and the pegylated fluoro
analogue (6) reached saturation close to that of biotin. The
fluorinated compounds 4 and 5 reached saturation approxi-
mately 5% and 15%, respectively, below that of biotin. The
18F-labelled analogues bound as well or slightly better as
compared with the 68Ga-labelled analogues (saturation reached
15–40% below native biotin).16 Increasing the incubation time
to 40minutes did not increase the binding of any of the
analogues.
The binding between equimolar amounts of the radiolabelled
biotin analogues and avidin (67mM each) at room temperature
was studied using HPLC. Regardless of the structure, 60–75%
of the labelled compounds 4–6 were bound to avidin within
5minutes, as shown in Figure 2. Compound 6, containing a di
(ethylene glycol) chain, showed higher binding than compounds
4 and 5, which contain alkyl chains. In contrast to our previous
work with 68Ga-labelled analogues, where PEG-linked analogues
showed lower binding to avidin than alkyl-linked16 in the case
of 18F analogues, the order was reversed. The binding was site-
specific, as the binding was blocked by treating the avidin with
[13] T. M. Shoup, A. J. Fischman, S. Jaywook, J. W. Babich, H. W. Strauss,
D. R. Elmaleh, J. Nucl. Med. 1994, 35, 1685–1690.
[14] A. Najafi, A. Peterson, Nucl. Med. Biol. 1993, 20, 401–405.
[15] M. Simpson, L. Trembleau, R. W. Cheyne, T. A. D. Smith, Appl. Radiat.
Isotop. 2011, 69, 418–422.
[16] E. Blom, B. Långström, I. Velikyan, Bioconjug. Chem. 2009, 20,
1146–1151.
[17] W. Zhang, S. Oya, M.- P. Kung, C. Hou, D. L. Maier, H. F. Kung, Nucl.
Med. Biol. 2005, 32, 799–809.
[18] J.- i. Morita, H. Nakatsuji, T. Misaki, Y. Tanabe, Green Chem. 2005, 7,
711–715.
[19] S. J. Krivickas, E. Tamanini, M. H. Todd, M. Watkinson, J. Org. Chem.
2007, 72, 8280–8289.
J. Label Compd. Radiopharm 2011, 54 681–683
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.