The Journal of Organic Chemistry
ARTICLE
ꢀ
1
1
.0 mL min , and UV detection at 214 nm (T = 25 °C). Reversed-phase
Universit ꢀa di Roma, Italy (funds for selected research topics
2008ꢀ2010).
HPLC was performed on a C18 symmetry, 3.5 μm (100 ꢂ 4.6 mm i.d.)
column, with a mobile phase composed of waterꢀacetonitrileꢀ
methanol 55:35:10 (v/v/v) buffered to apparent pH 5.6 using 10 mM
sodium phosphate, delivered at 1.0 mL min , and UV detection at
14 nm (T = 5 °C).
ꢀ
1
’ REFERENCES
(1) Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. World Health Organiza-
2
tion, 2009.
All the DHPLC experiments were performed on a C18 symmetry,
.5 μm (75 ꢂ 4.6 mm i.d.) column, with a ternary hydro-organic mobile
(2) O’Neill, P. M. Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs 2005, 14, 1117–1128.
3
ꢀ1
(3) (a) O’Neill, P. M.; Posner, G. H. J. Med. Chem. 2004,
7, 2945–2964. (b) Bez, G.; Kalita, B.; Sarmah, P.; Barua, N. C.; Dutta,
phase delivered at 1.0 mL min and UV detection at 214 nm. For the
study of the effects of pH and temperature on the rate constants, a
ternary mobile phase consisting of waterꢀacetonitrileꢀmethanol
4
D. K. Curr. Org. Chem. 2003, 7, 1231–1255.
4) Posner, G. H.; Paik, I.-H.; Chang, W.; Borstnik, K.; Sinishtaj, S.;
Rosenthal, A. S.; Shapiro, T. A. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 2516–2519.
5) Li, Q. G.; Peggins, J. O.; Fleckenstein, L. L.; Masonic, K.; Heiffer,
M. H.; Brewer, T. G. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1998, 50, 173–182.
6) (a) Pathak, A. K.; Jain, D. C.; Sharma, R. P. Indian J. Chem., Sect.
(
5
1
5:35:10 (v/v/v), at controlled temperatures in the range of
ꢀ
1
0ꢀ70 °C was tested. Solutions of 1 (0.25ꢀ1.0 mg mL ) in the
(
mobile phase were buffered to apparent pH values ranging from 2.6 to
8
.3 using 10 mM sodium phosphate. Aliquots of 10ꢀ20 μL were
(
injected. Increasing concentrations of sodium phosphate buffer inside
the range 10ꢀ200 mM were used in the study addressed to quantify the
catalytic role of each buffer’s component (see Table 2S and Figure 2S of
the Supporting Information for details about the employed concen-
trations). Sodium chloride (1, 10, and 100 mM) replaced sodium
phosphate in the ternary mobile phase waterꢀacetonitrileꢀmethanol
B: Org. Chem. Incl. Med. Chem. 1995, 34, 992–993. (b) Haynes, R. K.;
Chan, H.-W.; Lung, C.-M.; Ng, N.-C.; Wong, H.-N.; Shek, L. Y.;
Williams, I. D.; Cartwright, A.; Gomes, M. F. Chem. Med. Chem. 2007,
2, 1448–1463. (c) Dhooghe, L.; Van Miert, S.; Jansen, H.; Vlietinck, A.;
Pieters, L. Pharmazie 2007, 62, 900–901. (d) Jansen, F. H.; Soomro,
S. A. Curr. Med. Chem. 2007, 14, 3243–3259. (e) Haynes, R. K. Chem.
Med. Chem. 2006, 6, 509–537.
5
5:35:10 (v/v/v) in the study of the role of ionic strength.
(7) Zhou, Z. M.; Anders, J. C.; Chung, H.; Theoharides, A. D.
Simulation of Dynamic Chromatograms. Simulations of
experimental dynamic chromatograms were performed by using the
Auto DHPLC y2k laboratory-made computer program, which imple-
ments both stochastic and theoretical plate models and may take into
account all types of first-order interconversions as well as tailing effects.
In the present paper, all simulations were carried out by using the
stochastic model and taking tailing effects into consideration. The rate
constants in the mobile phase were properly set in order to obtain a 1r/
β ratio consistent with the thermodynamic KR/β ratio experimentally
measured in the same media by H NMR, according to a procedure
reported elsewhere.
Molecular Modeling Calculations. Geometries of 1r, 1β, 1r ,
J. Chromatogr. 1987, 414, 77–90.
(8) Karbwang, J.; Na-Bangchang, K.; Molunto, P.; Banmairuroi, V.;
Congpuong, K. J. Chromatogr. B 1997, 690, 259–265.
21
20
(9) (a) Batty, K. T.; Davies, T. M. E.; Thu, L. T.; Binh, T. Q.; Anh,
T. K.; Ilett, K. F. J. Chromatogr. B 1996, 677, 345–350. (b) Batty, K. T.;
Ilett, K. F.; Davis, T. M. E. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1996, 48, 22–26.
(c) Kotecka, B. M.; Rieckmann, K. H.; Davis, T. M. E.; Batty, K. T.; Ilett,
K. F. Acta Trop. 2003, 87, 371–375. (d) Batty, K. T.; Ilett, K. F.; Davis,
T. M. E. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2004, 57, 529–533.
1
1
(10) (a) Navaratnam, V.; Mordi, M. N.; Mansor, S. M.; Chin, L. K.;
18
Asokan, M.; Nair, N. K. J. Chromatogr. B 1995, 669, 289–294.
(b) Navaratnam, V.; Mordi, M. N.; Mansor, S. M. J. Chromatogr. B
1997, 692, 157–162. (c) Lai, C.-S.; Nair, N. K.; Mansor, S. M.; Olliaro,
P. L.; Navaratnam, V. J. Chromatogr. B 2007, 857, 308–314.
(11) (a) Sandrenan, N.; Sioufi, A.; Godbillon, J.; Netterb, C.;
Danker, M.; van Valkenburg, C. J. Chromatogr. B 1997, 691, 145–153.
ꢀ
ꢀ
1
β , and 3 were optimized at the SCF level by DFT calculations run
with the Amsterdam Density Functional (ADF) package v. 2007.01. The
employed method was the GGA-BLYP/DZP medium core basis set. All
of the relative solvation energies in hexane, acetonitrile, and water were
computed with the same program by the COnductor like Screening
MOdel (COSMO), with the cavity defined according to the Solvent
Excluding Surface (SES) algorithm.
(
b) Souppart, C.; Gauducheau, N.; Sandrenan, N.; Richard, F.
J. Chromatogr. B 2002, 774, 195–203.
12) Avery, B. A.; Venkatesh, K. K.; Avery, M. A. J. Chromatogr. B
999, 730, 71–80.
13) Ortelli, D.; Rudaz, S.; Cognard, E.; Veuthey, J.-L. Chromato-
graphia 2000, 52, 445–450.
14) (a) Sabarinath, S.; Rajanikanth, M.; Madhusudanan, K. P.;
(
1
(
’
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
(
S
Supporting Information. Activation parameters for the
b
Gupta, R. C. J. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 38, 732–742. (b) Rajanikanth,
M.; Madhusudanan, K. P.; Gupta, R. C. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2003, 17,
forward and backward first-order epimerization of 1. Second-
order rate constants based on specific and general acid and basic
catalysis. Contributions to the forward and backward pseudo-
first-order epimerization rate constants. Dynamic chromato-
grams digitalized by ref 17. Cartesian coordinates of 1r, 1β,
440–446.
(15) Naik, H.; Murry, D. J.; Kirsch, L. E.; Fleckenstein, L.
J. Chromatogr. B 2005, 816, 233–242.
(16) Liu, Y.; Zeng, X.; Deng, Y.; Wang, L.; Feng, Y.; Yang, L.; Zhou,
D. J. Chromatogr. B 2009, 877, 465–470.
ꢀ
ꢀ
1
r , 1β , and 3. This material is available free of charge via the
Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
(17) Shishan, Z. Chromatographia 1986, 22, 77–80.
(18) (a) Cabri, W.; Ciogli, A.; D’Acquarica, I.; Di Mattia, M.;
Galletti, B.; Gasparrini, F.; Giorgi, F.; Lalli, S.; Pierini, M.; Simone, P.
J. Chromatogr. B 2008, 875, 180–191. (b) D’Acquarica, I.; Gasparrini, F.;
Kotoni, D.; Pierini, M.; Villani, C.; Cabri, W.; Di Mattia, M.; Giorgi, F.
Molecules 2010, 15, 1309–1323.
’
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*
E-mail: (F.G.) francesco.gasparrini@uniroma1.it; (M.P.) marco.
(19) Cabri, W.; D’Acquarica, I.; Simone, P.; Di Iorio, M.; Di Mattia,
pierini@uniroma1.it.
M.; Gasparrini, F.; Giorgi, F.; Mazzanti, A.; Pierini, M.; Quaglia, M.;
Villani, C. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 1751–1758.
(
20) (a) Keller, R. A.; Giddings, J. C. J. Chromatogr. 1960,
, 205–220. (b) Kramer, R. J. Chromatogr. 1975, 107, 241–252.
c) Schurig, V.; B €u rkle, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 7573–7580.
(d) B €u rkle, W.; Karfunkel, H.; Schurig, V. J. Chromatogr. 1984,
288, 1–14. (e) Veciana, J.; Crespo, M. I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
’
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
3
(
We acknowledge financial support from FIRB [research
program: Ricerca e Sviluppo del Farmaco (CHEM-PROFAR-
MA-NET), grant no. RBPR05NWWC_003] and from Sapienza
4
839
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo102392p |J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 4831–4840