5060
I. K. Kostakis et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 5057–5060
Table 2. Inhibition of proliferation of the pyrazole-fuzed xanthenone derivatives (IC50 values in lMa)
Compound
R1
L1210
HT-29
MES-SA
MES-SA/Dx5
RFb
12a
12b
12c
20a
20b
20c
Mx
Dx
N(CH3)2
N(CH2)4
N(CH2)5
N(CH3)2
N(CH2)4
N(CH2)5
1.81 ( 0.41)
3.52 ( 0.35)
10.7 ( 1.85)
1.17 ( 0.20)
1.79 ( 0.21)
2.74 ( 0.70)
0.077 ( 0.010)
0.080 ( 0.005)
7.49 ( 0.31)
15.8 ( 2.38)
21.6 ( 7.99)
20.9 ( 9.45)
11.5 ( 1.89)
9.92 ( 3.41)
0.020 ( 0.004)
0.320 ( 0.180)
1.03 ( 0.58)
1.13 ( 0.07)
4.05 ( 0.75)
2.79 ( 0.69)
1.75 ( 0.16)
4.40 ( 0.90)
0.003 ( 0.000)
0.016 ( 0.008)
0.63 ( 0.25)
1.47 ( 0.21)
5.38 ( 1.26)
2.76 ( 1.08)
1.58 ( 0.12)
3.88 ( 0.35)
0.030 ( 0.020)
1.56 ( 0.10)
0.61
1.29
1.33
0.99
0.90
0.88
11.55
98.25
a The results represent means ( standard deviation) of three independent experiments and are expressed as IC50, the concentration that reduced by
50% the optical density of treated cells with respect to untreated controls.
b IC50 resistant cells/IC50 sensitive cells.
Table 3. Cell cycle-phase distribution (%)a
3. Wiseman, L. R.; Spencer, C. M. Drug Aging 1997, 10, 473.
4. Benekli, M.; Kars, A.; Guler, N. Ann. Intern. Med. 1997,
126, 409.
5. Bailly, J. D.; Skladanowski, A.; Bettaieb, A.; Mansat,
V.; Larsen, A. K.; Laurent, G. Leukemia 1997, 11,
1523.
6. Godas, H.; Mansi, J. L. Cancer Treat. Rev. 1996, 21, 541.
7. Liwo, A.; Jeziorek, D.; Ossowski, T.; Dyl, D.; Tempczyk,
A.; Tarasiuk, J.; Nowaska, M.; Borowski, E.; Woznicki,
W. Acta Biochim. Pol. 1995, 42, 445.
8. Berg, S. L. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hemat. 1996, 22, 79.
9. Antonini, I. Curr. Med. Chem. 2002, 9, 1701.
10. Klohs, W. D.; Steinkampf, R. W.; Havlick, M. J.;
Jackson, R. C. Cancer Res. 1986, 46, 4352.
11. Lehne, G. Curr. Drug Targets 2000, 1, 85.
12. Tarasiuk, J.; Majewska, E.; Seksek, O.; Rogacka, D.;
Antonini, I.; Garnier-Suillerot, A.; Borowski, E. Biochem.
Pharmacol. 2004, 68, 1815.
13. Adjei, A. A. Invest New Drugs 1999, 17, 43.
14. Capps, D. B.; Dunbar, J.; Kesten, S. R.; Shillis, J. L.;
Werbel, L. M.; Plowman, J.; Ward, D. L. J. Med. Chem.
1992, 35, 4770.
15. Keshelava, N.; Tsao-Wei, D.; Reynolds, C. P. AntiCancer
Drug Des. 1999, 14, 451.
16. Adjei, A. A.; Charron, M.; Rowinski, E. K.; Svingen,
P. A.; Miller, J.; Reid, J. M.; Sebold-Leopold, J.;
Ames, M. M.; Kaufmann, S. H. Cancer Res. 1998, 4,
683.
17. Hu, Y.; Krishan, A.; Nie, W. J.; Sridhar, K. S.; Mayer,
L. D.; Bally, M. Clin. Cancer Res 2004, 10, 1160.
18. Kostakis, I. K.; Ghirtis, K.; Pouli, N.; Marakos, P.;
Skaltsounis, A. L.; Leonce, S.; Gaignard, D. H.; Atassi, G.
Il Farmaco 2000, 55, 455.
19. Kolokythas, G.; Kostakis, I. K.; Pouli, N.; Marakos, P.;
Skaltsounis, A. L.; Pratsinis, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2002, 12, 1443.
20. Kolokythas, G.; Kostakis, I. K.; Pouli, N.; Marakos, P.;
Kletsas, D.; Pratsinis, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem 2003, 11,
4591.
21. Kostakis, I.; Magiatis, P.; Pouli, N.; Marakos, P.;
Skaltsounis, A. L.; Pratsinis, H.; Leonce, S.; Pierre, A.
J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2599.
Compound
G0/G1
S
G2/M
9b
41.70 ( 2.12)
59.41 ( 3.71)
30.00 ( 4.90)
33.06 ( 3.08)
22.63 ( 1.19)
20.79 ( 3.67)
32.66 ( 4.12)
43.40 ( 8.12)
20.87 ( 4.21)
14.81 ( 0.91)
37.41 ( 5.51)
7.93 ( 1.49)
26.60 ( 5.75)
46.08 ( 3.60)
62.57 ( 3.88)
17b
12a
20a
20b
Control
54.70 ( 4.80)
35.57 ( 2.84)
9.74 ( 1.96)
a Mean ( standard deviation) of three independent experiments.
simultaneously possess generally comparable cytotoxicity
against the doxorubicin resistant MES-SA/Dx5 cell line.
The ability of all the tested compounds to overcome mul-
tidrug resistance of the MES-SA/Dx5 cell line is clearly
indicated by the resistant factor (RF) values, which are
all practically equal to 1. These results suggest that the
novel compounds seem to be hardly recognized by the
protein mechanisms controlling multidrug resistance.
Worth mentioning, the RF to doxorubicin was found to
be 98.25, as expected,23 while the RF to mitoxantrone
was 11.55.
Cell-cycle perturbations induced after incubation of
exponentially growing MES-SA uterine sarcoma cells
with a number of new compounds for 24 h are given
in Table 3. The studied compounds provoke, in general,
a G2/M arrest, expected on account of their structural
similarity to pyrazoloacridines and mitoxantrone, which
have also been reported to block the cell cycle in the G2
phase.24,25 Compound 17b, with an IC50 higher than the
concentration used for FACS analysis, had, indeed, no
significant effect on the cell cycle-phase distribution.
In conclusion, we have prepared a novel series of xan-
thenone aminoderivatives, bearing structural analogy
to PZA, which inhibit the proliferation of several cancer
cell lines. Most noticeably, this class of compounds
exhibits a very promising ability to overcome the multi-
drug resistance of the MES-SA/Dx5 cell line.
22. Gabbutt, C. D.; Hepworth, J. D.; Urquhart, M. W. J.;
Vazquez de Miguel, L. M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1997, 1819.
23. Harker, W. G.; Sikic, B. I. Cancer Res. 1985, 45, 4091.
24. Grem, J. L.; Politi, P. M.; Berg, S. L.; Benchekroun, N.
M.; Patel, M.; Balis, F.; Sinha, B. K.; Dahut, W.; Allegra,
C. J. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1996, 51, 1649.
References and notes
1. Malonne, H.; Atassi, G. AntiCancer Drugs 1997, 8, 811.
2. Dunn, C. J.; Goa, K. L. Drug Aging 1996, 9, 122.
25. Traganos, F.; Evenson, D. P.; Staiano-Coico, L.; Dar-
zynkiewicz, Z.; Melamed, M. R. Cancer Res. 1980, 40, 671.