from a slight difference in capacitance, which is evident from
the difference in the magnitude of the plateau current in the
voltammograms (Figure S1c) and is attributed to slightly differ-
ent amounts of polymer being present on the electrodes in
each device, the devices appear to perform identically. Based
solely on the cyclic voltammetry, one might incorrectly con-
clude that the addition of the solvent made no difference to
device performance.
ously been reported for molecules of this type. We also per-
formed preliminary analysis of BTHFE as a solvent in electro-
chemical supercapacitors. In this capacity, the BTHFE proved to
be electrochemically stable, even though 1m solutions of the
IL 1-ethyl-3-methyl-imidizolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)i-
mide had resistances that were approximately 20 W higher
than the neat IL. Further analysis of both the NMR and electro-
chemical properties of BTHFE are ongoing.
We performed electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
(EIS) measurements on the devices to shed light on any subtle
differences in capacitive performance, as well as to gain insight
into the resistance of the electrolyte that contributed to the
systems. The high-frequency plateau in the Bode magnitude
plot, which can be used to determine the solution resistance
of the device, shows that the 1m EMIBTI solution has a resist-
ance that is approximately 20 W higher than that of neat
EMIBTI (see Figure S1d). This result was consistent for each
device analyzed. To verify that this resistance was caused by
the electrolyte solution, and not caused by the conducting
polymer that was on the electrodes, we performed EIS meas-
urements on devices that contained only the separator paper
soaked in electrolyte and electrodes that did not have any
polymer on them. These measurements yielded device resis-
tances of 18Æ6 and 45Æ10 W at the 90% confidence level for
the neat EMIBTI and 1m EMIBTI solutions, respectively. The dif-
ference between the resistances measured for devices that
contained polymer and those that did not contain polymer is
not statistically significant, but the difference between neat
EMIBTI and the 1m EMIBTI solution is statistically significant.
These results are counter to our hypothesis that the addition
of solvent would lower the resistance by breaking up the ion-
pairing interactions that are present in neat EMIBTI. Further ex-
ploration showed that the conductivities of EMIBTI/BTHFE solu-
tions are directly proportional to the concentration of EMBTI,
up to approximately 90% EMIBTI, where it plateaus, at about
9 mScmÀ1 (see Figure S2 in the Supporting Information).
The Bode phase-angle plot (see Figure S1e) shows that, at
frequencies below approximately 1 Hz, the phase angle for
both neat EMIBTI and the BTHFE solution approaches À90%,
and is indicative of nearly ideal capacitive behavior. These re-
sults suggest that BTHFE solutions warrant further analysis in
electrochemical capacitors, because it appears that the solvent
is relatively stable electrochemically.
Experimental Section
Tetrahydrofurfurylalcohol (THFA, Sigma Aldrich,ꢀ98%), tetrahydro-
furan (THF, Sigma Aldrich, Reagent Grade,ꢀ99%, BHT inhibited),
sodium metal (Sigma Aldrich, Reagent Grade, dry stick), methane-
sulfonyl chloride (Sigma Aldrich, 99.7%), pyridine (Sigma Aldrich,
Anhydrous, 99.8%), and propylene carbonate (Sigma Aldrich, Anhy-
drous, 99.7%) were purchased and used as received. 1-Ethyl-3-
methyl-imidizolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (EMIBTI), for
use in the electrochemical measurements, was synthesized as pre-
viously reported.[11] Elemental analyses were performed independ-
ently by Atlantic Microlabs, Inc., Norcross, GA; Intertek Pharma-
ceutical Services, Whitehouse, NJ; and MHW Labs, Phoenix, AZ. The
elemental analysis results reported with the synthetic procedures
are averages of the results from all three laboratories. Electrochem-
ical depositions and cyclic voltammetry were performed by using
a Pine Instruments Model AFCBP1 potentiostat. EIS measurements
were performed by using a Princeton Applied Research PARSTAT
2273 potentiostat. Conductivity measurements of EMIBTI/BTHFE
solutions were performed by using a Jenway 4590 conductivity
meter at 25Æ0.38C.
Synthesis of (Tetrahydrofuran-2-yl)methyl Methanesulfonate
A three-neck round-bottom flask was filled with 200 mL pyridine
and 88 mL (91.8 g, 0.90 moles) THFA. The mixture was placed in an
ice/water bath and purged with nitrogen for 1 h. Methanesulfonyl
chloride (73 mL, 108.4 g, 0.94 moles) was added drop-wise to the
continuously chilled mixture from an addition funnel over a period
of 12 h. The mixture was then allowed to warm to room tempera-
ture over the next 48 h, at which time it was combined with
500 mL of 1.2m HCl and extracted three times with 125 mL por-
tions of dichloromethane. The organic phases were combined and
then extracted once with 125 mL of 1.2m HCl, followed by 125 mL
of saturated NaCl. Finally, the dichloromethane solution was dried
with MgSO4, and the solvent was removed under reduced pres-
sure. The crude product was a light yellow liquid, and the yield of
crude material was 144 g (89%). Portions of the crude material
were vacuum distilled at 0.34 mmHg to obtain pure product
(125 g, 77% yield), which was a clear, colorless liquid. The head-
space temperature during distillation of the pure material was
We have synthesized bis(tetrahydrofurfuryl) ether (BTHFE) in
a high purity by using (tetrahydrofuran-2-yl)methyl methane-
sulfonate as a starting material. The methanesulfonate ion is
a more efficient leaving group for an SN2 reaction than bro-
mide, which had previously been employed to synthesize
BTHFE, and its use prevented the previously observed side
product, 2-methylene tetrahydrofuran, from forming. Generally,
we have demonstrated that the use of (tetrahydrofuran-2-yl)-
methyl methanesulfonate, rather than tetrahydrofurfuryl hal-
ides, provides a versatile starting material that permits the syn-
thesis of tetrahydrofurfuryl ethers with bulky substituents. The
NMR analysis of BTHFE demonstrated that the product was
a mixture of stereoisomers, as expected; although, we ob-
served temperature-dependent peak shifts that have not previ-
1028C. This material was characterized by using H and 13C NMR, 2-
1
D NMR, GC–MS, FTIR, and elemental analysis. CAUTION: (Tetrahy-
drofuran-2-yl)methyl methanesulfonateis stable in air at room tem-
perature, but will react violently if heated while exposed to air.
1H NMR (CDCl3 500 MHz) d=1.60 (m, 1H), 1.8 (m, 2H), 1.9 (m, 1H),
3.03 (s, 3H), 3.76 (m, 2H), 4.0 (m, 2H), ß4.14 ppm (m, 1H). 13C NMR
d=76.29, 71.65, 68.60, 37.55, 27.60, 25.75 ppm; elemental analysis:
calcd: 39.93% C, 6.71% H, 17.79% S; found: 40.1% C, 6.7% H,
18:01% S; GC–MS indicated 98.6% purity.
ChemistryOpen 2016, 00, 0 – 0
3
ꢀ 2016 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
&
These are not the final page numbers! ÞÞ