Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
34
J.M. Crowder et al. / Polyhedron 157 (2019) 33–38
fluorinated coordination complexes and organofluorine com-
pounds has advanced the understanding of the role of fluorine in
supramolecular packing as it relates to the design of advanced
functional materials, enhanced doping, crystal engineering, and
molecular recognition processes in medicinal chemistry [13].
These remarkable properties and applications stimulate continued
interest in synthesis and study of highly electrophilic homo- and
heterometallic b-diketonates.
Herein, we target the isolation of the unsolvated Cu(II) complex
[CuL2] (1) with highly-fluorinated bis(pentafluorobenzoyl)metha-
nide ligands followed by testing its ability to serve as a metallo-
ligand or ligand-transfer reagent. We used high volatility and
coordinatively unsaturated ability of the above copper complex
to synthesize [Na2Cu2L4(hfac)2] (2), the first heterometallic
Na–Cu b-diketonate characterized by X-ray crystallography.
2. Results and discussion
2.1. Synthesis and crystal growth
The preparation of unsolvated [CuL2] (1) in the single-crys-
talline form suitable for X-ray crystallographic characterization
began with the synthesis of benzene-solvated [CuL2]ꢁ3(C6H6)
adduct as previously reported [14], except that anhydrous starting
reagents and dry solvents were employed in an oxygen-free and
moisture-free environment (see Supporting Information (SI) for
more details). Superstitial benzene was removed by heating in
vacuo, and single crystals of 1 were grown using a small-scale sub-
limation-deposition method at 150 °C in 3 days. This procedure
was optimized to produce bulk crystals of 1 in ca. 80% yield, allow-
ing the effective use of 1 in subsequent reactions. The purity of
bulk crystalline product was confirmed by comparing the X-ray
powder diffraction pattern to the one calculated from the single
crystal data (see Fig. S11 and Table S9). The preparation of 1 in
the unsolvated form was a critical step which allowed the explo-
ration of its synthetic potential in further reactions. The avidity
of 1 for additional coordination has been illustrated by the forma-
tion of [CuL2(H2O)] (3) crystallized from regular hexanes via slow
evaporation of the solvent at room temperature (see SI for the
details). This experimental evidence further reinforced the need
to use the high-quality anhydrous solvents or solvent-free condi-
tions when 1 is utilized as a new metallo-ligand.
For the next step, bulk crystals of 1 were combined with sodium
hexafluoroacetylacetonate [Na(hfac)] in a 1:1 molar ratio and the
mixture was sealed under vacuum in a small glass ampule. The
ampule was heated at 120 °C for 7 days resulting in the formation
of bright teal green product, [Na2Cu2L4(hfac)2] (2), in nearly quan-
titative yield. The purity of the bulk crystalline product was con-
firmed by X-ray powder diffraction analysis (see Fig. S12 and
Table S10). The X-ray quality single crystals of 2 were grown at
slightly lower temperature in a 110 °C oven with ca. 5 °C tempera-
ture gradient in 10 days (yield 60–80%). To the best of our knowl-
edge, the only other known Na–Cu heterometallic b-diketonate
derivative is b-diketonatofluoroalkoxide [NaCu{OCH(CF3)2}2
(thd)]m (thdH = 2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dione) [15]. This
mixed-ligand complex, comprised of fluoroisopropoxide and non-
fluorinated b-diketonate ligands, was characterized by elemental
analysis, IR, and mass spectrometry; however, an X-ray crystallo-
graphic investigation was not reported.
Fig. 1. Molecular structure of 1. Color scheme: copper – blue; oxygen – red; carbon
– grey; fluorine – green. Hydrogen atoms are omitted. Carbon atoms C(7), C(8) and
C(9) deviate slightly from the Cu–O(L) plane by 0.127, 0.300 and 0.259 Å,
respectively. (Color online.)
contains only one bis(pentafluorobenzoyl)methanide ligand (L).
The copper coordination environment is square planar with Cu–O
(1) and Cu–O(2) bond distances of 1.9063(8) and 1.9236(7) Å,
respectively. These distances are within the range of those
reported for related Cu(II) diketonate structures (Table 1)
[7c,8,14,16]. The pentafluorophenyl groups of L are twisted relative
to the metal–oxygen coordination plane with dihedral angles of
36.4 and 68.9° between the [O(1)–O(2)–O(1A)–O(2A)] plane and
the planes created by the aromatic rings D and E (Fig. 1). Further-
more, the planes formed by rings D and E are nearly orthogonal
with an angle of 87.1°. For comparison, the pentafluorophenyl
groups in [CuL2]ꢁ3(C6H6) [14] are similarly twisted, whereas the
dibenzoylmethanato (dbm) ligands in [Cu(dbm)2] [16] (the non-
fluorinated analogue of 1) are nearly coplanar with the metal–oxy-
gen plane. The X-ray single-crystal data and structure refinement
parameters of 1 are given in Table S5, and the thermal ellipsoid
plot is shown in Fig. S5. Bond angles for 1 are listed in Table S6,
and an alternative view of 1, illustrating the planarity of the
Cu–O core and the twisted nature of L, is shown in Fig. S6.
In the solid state, the molecules of 1 form the columns down the
crystallographic a-axis with intermolecular C–Fꢁ ꢁ ꢁpF interactions
between C(15)–F(10) of one molecule and pentafluorophenyl ring
D of the adjacent molecule (Fig. S7), and the distances and angles
are similar to those previously reported [7c,17]. The distance
Table 1
Comparison of interatomic distances between 1 and related structurally characterized
copper diketonates.
Cu–O distances (Å)
O–C distances (Å)
[CuL2] (1) [a]
1.9063(8), 1.9236(7)
1.932(2), 1.923(2) [b]
1.9104(13), 1.9295(14)
1.9100(19), 1.9216(18)
1.892(3), 1.914(3)
1.2714(12), 0.2681(12)
1.265(3), 1.270 (3)
1.265(3), 1.268(3)
1.271(3), 1.271(3)
1.274(5), 1.266(5)
1.259(2), 1.264(3)
[CuL2(H2O)] (3) [a]
[CuL2]ꢁ3(C6H6) [14]
[CuL02] [7c]
[Cu(dbm)2] [16]
[Cu(hfac)2] [8]
2.2. X-ray crystallographic study
1.914(2), 1.924(2)
The unsolvated mononuclear complex [CuL2] (1) (Fig. 1) crystal-
ꢀ
lizes in the centrosymmetric space group P1 with the copper atom
[a] This work.
[b] Cu–O(L) distances. L0 = C6H5COCHCOC6Fꢀ5 . dhm = C6H5COCHCOC6Hꢀ5 .
residing on the inversion center. The asymmetric unit therefore