3898 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 118, No. 16, 1996
Queeney et al.
All masses between 2 and 150 amu were monitored during these
experiments, and no other gaseous reaction products were
detected.11
conclusion, as well as the assignment of the â1 tail at 500 K to
reaction-limited dihydrogen evolution, is confirmed by temper-
ature-programmed reaction of HOCD2CD2OH. The observed
predominance of H2 in the â2 state indicates that this peak
originates from the recombination of hydroxyl protons and that,
therefore, facile O-H bond scission occurs below 390 K. In
contrast, the reaction-limited â1 tail at 500 K consists mainly
of D2, resulting from recombination of surface deuterium formed
from dehydrogenation of a surface hydrocarbon intermediate.
Finally, the saturation coverage for ethylene glycol on Mo(110)
is estimated to be 0.14 ML, based on the relative dihydrogen
yields observed during temperature-programmed reaction of
ethylene glycol and a known coverage of methanol on Mo-
(110).10
Ethylene is formed in two distinct states with peak temper-
atures of ∼350 and ∼390 K during temperature-programmed
reaction of a saturation exposure of ethylene glycol on Mo-
(110) (Figure 1B(v)).18,19 The evolution of ethylene in both
states is limited by the rate of the reaction, not desorption, since
ethylene desorbs below 300 K when adsorbed on both clean
and O-covered Mo(110).20 Ethylene production is a sensitive
function of the initial ethylene glycol coverage; at the lowest
exposure studied (0.05 of saturation), nonselective decomposi-
tion is the sole reaction pathway, and no ethylene evolution is
detected. However, as the coverage is increased to 0.11 of
saturation, ethylene is produced in a single state with a peak
maximum at ∼365 K (Figure 1B(i)). The two distinct ethylene
states are evident at ∼0.5 of saturation and above (Figure
1B(iv,v)). A small high-temperature ethylene tail at ∼510 K
also grows in at the highest ethylene glycol exposures (Figure
1B(iv,v)). Importantly, data obtained using HOCD2CD2OH
demonstrate that there is no reversible C-H bond scission along
the path to ethylene formation, since C2D4 is formed exclusively;
no C2D3H, C2D2H2, C2DH3, or C2H4 are detected (data not
shown).21 These data suggest that ethylene is evolved directly
into the gas phase at ∼350 K following facile C-O bond
scission. Further evidence against ethylene interaction with the
surface is provided by previous studies of the reactions of
ethylene on clean and oxygen-precovered Mo(110), which
demonstrate that any residual ethylene on these surfaces above
250 K undergoes decomposition.20 We estimate that at satura-
tion coverage ethylene is eliminated with ∼85% selectivity, with
the remaining ∼15% of the ethylene glycol nonselectively
decomposing, based on the ratio of the high-temperature CO
produced during temperature-programmed reaction of ethylene
glycol and methanol.22
Dihydrogen is produced in two states, the primary one with
a peak temperature of 390 K (â2), with a pronounced shoulder
at 500 K (â1), for temperature-programmed reaction of a satur-
ation exposure of ethylene glycol on Mo(110) (Figure 1C(v)).
There is almost no change in the peak temperature of the â2
state over the entire coverage range studied (Figure 1C(i-v)),
other than a slight broadening on the low-temperature side at
the highest ethylene glycol coverage. We assign the â2
dihydrogen peak to the recombination of surface hydrogen
originating from the hydroxyl hydrogens of the parent glycol
molecule, by reference to previous studies of hydrogen as well
as alkoxides on Mo(110), which indicate that this â2 hydrogen
peak is limited by desorption, not reaction kinetics.7,10,23 This
X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy indicates that there is a single surface intermediate
with an intact C-O bond after annealing low coverages of
ethylene glycol (θ < 0.4θsat) to 300 K.24 The X-ray photo-
electron peak with an O(1s) binding energy of 532.6 eV and
resolution-limited width is assigned to oxygen in an alkoxide
group by comparison with X-ray photoelectron spectra of other
alcohols on Mo(110) (Figure 2A(i)).7,10,23 Importantly, the
existence of only a single C-O bond environment and the
complete absence of an X-ray photoelectron feature due to intact
C-O-H groups near 533.7 eV (see below) is strongly sugges-
tive of the existence of a single bidentate-type intermediate at
these coverages. In addition, a small amount of decomposition
also occurs at low coverage, based on the peak at 530.8 eV,
which is ascribed to atomic oxygen by comparison to X-ray
photoelectron spectra of oxygen adsorbed on Mo(110). Notably,
no atomic oxygen is detected in X-ray photoelectron spectra
recorded at 100 K (data not shown), showing the absence of
any C-O bond scission at these lower temperatures. In
agreement with the data for the O(1s) region, there is a single
carbon environment at 300 K, signified by a single C(1s) peak
at 286.7 eV, which is similar to that measured for other
alkoxides on Mo(110) (Figure 2B(i)).7,10,23 The presence of
atomic oxygen and the concomitant lack of atomic carbon
detected in the X-ray photoelectron experiments at 300 K are
consistent with temperature-programmed reaction spectra in
which ethylene evolution begins below 300 K at these coverages
(Figure 1B(iii)).
As the coverage of ethylene glycol on Mo(110) increases
beyond 0.4θsat, both the O(1s) and C(1s) alkoxide peaks develop
higher-binding energy shoulders after annealing to 300 K,
suggesting the existence of a second surface species (Figures
2A(ii) and 2B(ii)). As the coverage is increased to saturation
the new feature in the O(1s) region, centered at ∼533.7 eV,
has approximately 0.2 times the integrated area of the 532.6-
eV alkoxide peak (Figure 2A(ii)).25 Similarly, the C(1s)
spectrum becomes highly asymmetric, displaying a shoulder
centered at ∼287.9 eV. While the intensity of this peak is
sensitive to the fit, the data are well fit when the shoulder
accounts for ∼0.2 times that of the main alkoxide peak at 286.7
eV, in agreement with the O(1s) region (Figure 2B(ii)). By
comparison with the X-ray photoelectron spectra for multilayers
of ethylene glycol (data not shown), these new features are
assigned to the oxygen and carbon of an intact C-O-H group.
(18) Saturation coverage, θsat, is defined as the exposure beyond which
the reaction product yields do not increase any further and the multilayer
desorption peak at 195 K increases without bound.
(19) Identification of products was verified by comparison of cracking
patterns observed during reaction with that obtained using a genuine sample
of ethylene. Importantly, the entire m/e 28 signal during temperature-
programmed reaction of ethylene glycol was accounted for by the observed
ratio of m/e 28:m/e 27:m/e 26 in the genuine ethylene sample, confirming
that no CO was produced by the reaction of ethylene glycol on Mo(110).
(20) Serafin, J. G.; Friend, C. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 6019.
(21) If reversible C-H bond scission occurred, recombination of the
alcoholic hydrogens with the deuterated alkyl fragments would take place,
incorporating H into some of the ethylene evolved.
(22) The selectivity estimated was based on the saturation coverage of
methanol on Mo(110), previously found to be 0.25 ML.10 Over 95% of the
methanol undergoes nonselective decomposition to form gaseous dihydrogen
along with adsorbed carbon and oxygen on Mo(110). The carbon and oxygen
subsequently recombine to form CO ∼1200 K. Comparison of the integrated
CO intensity for ethylene glycol and methanol on Mo(110) is used to
estimate the amount of nonselective reaction.
(24) Approximately the same heating rate was used to anneal the surface
prior to recording X-ray photoelectron and infrared spectra as was used for
the temperature-programmed reaction experiments.
(25) The intensity due to the new feature is distinct from the intensity
always seen as a tail to the higher-binding energy side of the O(1s) signal
due to final state effects.26 Intensity due to the tail is estimated by comparison
to lower-coverage spectra, where no shoulder due to a second species
appears.
(23) Uvdal, P.; Wiegand, B. C.; Serafin, J. G.; Friend, C. M. J. Chem.
Phys. 1992, 97(11), 8727.