2
X. Yang et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta xxx (2016) xxx–xxx
2.1.4. [Mn(L)(H2O)] (2)
COO
N
A solution of Mn(ClO4)2ꢁ4H2O (0.03 mmol, 5.48 mg) in water
(4 mL) was mixed under stirring with the methanol solution
(2 mL) containing [H3L]OTs (5 mg, 0.01 mmol) and NaN3 (13 mg,
0.2 mmol). The resulting solution was heated in a stainless steel
reactor with a Teflon liner (25 mL) at 120 °C for 3 d and cooled to
ambient temperature at a rate of ca.10 °C hꢀ1 to give yellow block
crystals (yield: 65%, based on [H3L]OTs). Elemental analysis calcd.
(%) for C14H9O7NMn: C 46.95, H 2.53, N 3.91; Found: C 46.53, H
2.60, N 3.98. Main IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): 3480s, 3069w, 1638s, 1610m,
1578w, 1557s, 1362s, 884w, 807w, 727w, 689w.
OOC
COO
Scheme 1. Structure of L2ꢀ
.
2.1.5. [Cd(L)(H2O)] (3)
A solution of [H3L]OTs (5 mg,0.01 mmol) in H2O/DMF (3 mL,
v/v = 2/1) was mixed under stirring with Cd(NO3)2ꢁ4H2O
(9.25 mg, 0.03 mmol). The resulting solution was heated in a stain-
less steel reactor with a Teflon liner (25 mL) at 120 °C for 1 d and
cooled to ambient temperature at a rate of ca.10 °C hꢀ1 to give col-
orless block crystals (yield: 69%, based on [H3L]OTs). Elemental
analysis calcd. (%) for C14H9O7NCd: C 40.46, H 2.18, N 3.37; Found:
C 40.21, H 2.21, N 3.28. Main IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): 3473br, 3056m,
1631s, 1608w, 1554s, 1579s, 1361s, 883w, 840w, 770s, 730s,
684w.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials and synthesis
All the reagents and solvents employed were commercially
available and used without further purification. 2,4-Dinitrophenyl
toluenesulfonate was prepared according to literature procedures
[26].
2.1.6. [Zn(L)(H2O)]ꢁ2H2O (4)
2.1.1. [H3L]OTs
A solution of [H3L]OTs (5 mg,0.01 mmol) in H2O/DMF (3 mL,
v/v = 2/1) was mixed under stirring with Zn(NO3)2ꢁ6H2O
(8.91 mg, 0.03 mmol). The mixture was sealed in a tube and heated
at 80 °C for 1 d and cooled to the room temperature at a rate of
ca.10 °C hꢀ1 to give colorless block crystals (yield: 73% based on
To 2,4-dinitrophenyl toluenesulfonate (6.7 g, 12.59 mmol) dis-
solved in toluene (9 mL) was added ethyl isonicotinate (3 mL,
20.02 mmol), and the mixture was stirred for 18 h at 100 °C. The
resultant yellow precipitate was isolated by filtration and washed
with toluene. The reaction product (1.042 g, 2 mmol) and dimethyl
5-aminoisophthalate (0.84 g, 2 mmol) were dissolved in ethanol/
water (20 mL, v:v = 10:1), and stirred for 48 h at 100 °C. After filter-
ing off the insolvable solid, the filtrate was washed with Et2O three
times and evaporated to give a white product. The white product
was hydrolyzed by reacting it with 5 mL of 5 M HCl at reflux for
12 h at 100 °C. After the reaction mixture was cooled, it was con-
centrated with a rotary evaporator to give white powder. Yield:
0.76 g (73.4%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): d = 9.58 (d, J = 6.4 Hz,
2H), 8.72 (s, 1H), 8.86 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 2H), 8.58 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H),
7.47 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.11 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.28 (s, 3H). Main IR
(KBr, cmꢀ1): 3440 m, 3074m, 1724s, 1436m, 1409m, 1228s,
912w, 809w, 767w, 680w.
[H3L]OTs). Elemental analysis calcd. (%) for C14H13O9NZn:
C
41.55, H 3.46, N 3.24; Found: C 41.61, H 3.28, N 3.44. Main IR
(KBr, cmꢀ1): 3523w, 3405w, 3303m, 3228m, 1633br, 1575s,
1363s, 912w, 835w, 771s, 730s, 688w.
2.2. Physical measurements
Elemental analyses were determined on an Elementar Vario
ELIII analyzer. The FT-IR spectra were recorded in the range
500–4000 cmꢀ1 using KBr pellets on a Nicolet NEXUS 670 spec-
trophotometer. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Advance
400 MHz spectrometer. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) was
recorded on a Rigaku Ultima IV X-ray diffractometer equipped with
a Cu-target tube at 35 kV, 25 mA, and a graphite monochromator.
Thermogravimetric (TG) analysis was performed using a Mettler
TGALSDTA851e/5FL1100 instrument. Solid fluorescence spectra
were recorded on a HitachiF-4500 spectrometer. Temperature-
dependent magnetic measurements were carried out on a Quan-
tum Design SQUID MPMS-5 magnetometer with an applied field
of 1 kOe, and diamagnetic corrections were made with Pascal’s
constants.
2.1.2. H2Lꢁ2H2O
A solution of [H3L]OTs (5 mg, 0.01 mmol) in 3 mL H2O was
mixed under stirring with Zn(NO3)2ꢁ6H2O (8.91 mg, 0.03 mmol).
The mixture was sealed in a tube and heated at 80 °C for 1 d and
cooled to the room temperature to give colorless flake crystals
(yield: 65% based on [H3L]OTs). Elemental analysis calcd. (%) for
C
14H13O8N: C 52.15, H 4.06, N 4.29; Found: C 52.02, H 4.05, N
4.33. Main IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): 3585s, 3480m, 1700s, 1633s, 1594m,
1548m, 1336s, 1226m, 896w, 836w, 765w, 688w.
2.3. X-ray crystallography
Diffraction data for 1–4 and H2Lꢁ2H2O were collected at 296 K
2.1.3. [Cu3L2(OH)2] (1)
on a Bruker Apex II CCD area detector equipped with graphite
[H3L]OTs (5 mg, 0.01 mmol) was dissolved in water (3 mL) and
the pH was adjusted to 6 with 0.1 mol Lꢀ1 NaOH solution. Then, Cu
(NO3)2ꢁ6H2O (7.25 mg, 0.03 mmol) was added to the solution. The
resulting solution was heated in a stainless steel reactor with a
Teflon liner (25 mL) at 120 °C for 3 d and cooled to ambient
temperature at a rate of ca.10 °C hꢀ1 to give green block crystals
(yield: 46%, based on [H3L]OTs). Elemental analysis calcd. (%) for
monochromated Mo Ka radiation (k = 0.71073 A°). Empirical
absorption corrections were applied using the SADABS program
[27]. The structures were solved by the direct method and refined
by the full-matrix least-squares method on F2 [28], with all non-
hydrogen atoms refined with anisotropic thermal parameters. All
the hydrogen atoms attached to carbon atoms were placed in cal-
culated positions and refined using the riding model. The water
hydrogen atoms were located from the difference maps and
refined isotropically. A summary of the crystallographic data, data
collection, and refinement parameters are provided in Table 1.
C28H16O14N2Cu3: C 42.30, H 2.03, N 3.52; Found: C 41.89, H 2.12,
N 3.39. Main IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): 3521m, 3457s, 1633s, 1604s, 1571s,
1558w, 1361s, 925w, 806w, 761s, 723s, 688w.