Al Doping on Ferrihydrite Nanoparticles
J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 110, No. 24, 2006 11747
nine times with a minimum of 3 h between each water change.
After dialysis, the suspension was poured into shallow dishes
to dry. The shiny, deep-red solid that resulted was ground into
a fine reddish-brown powder and stored in a glass vial.
Materials Characterization. The materials were character-
ized using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-
MS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and transmission electron
microscopy (TEM).
ICP-MS samples were prepared by dissolving the solid
particles in a solution of 4.8 M HCl and 3.2 M HNO3, followed
by dilution in 0.1 M HNO3. The diluted solutions were analyzed
for Fe, Al, As, and Na cation content using a ThermoElemental
PQ ExCell quadrupole ICP-MS. Each sample was analyzed in
duplicate, and concentrations were determined using a four-
point calibration curve for each cation.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the 0%, 0.4%, 1.4%, and 2.1% aluminum-
substituted ferrihydrites. Diffraction patterns are shown in black.
Difference plots, which are determined by subtracting the 0% Al pattern
from each Al-substituted pattern, serve to highlight small shifts in peak
positions and are shown in gray beneath each pattern. All patterns are
consistent with the reference pattern for 6-line ferrihydrite, shown as
solid lines (s). No evidence of goethite was observed in the patterns,
and the reference peak for the strongest goethite reflection is shown as
a dashed line (- - -).
X-ray diffraction was performed using a PANalytical X’pert
PRO MPD X-ray diffractometer equipped with an X’Celerator
detector and cobalt source. Powdered samples were back-loaded
into XRD sample holders to create flat surfaces. Data was
collected over the range of 10-100° 2θ at a scan rate of 1°/
min. The diffraction patterns were compared to the reference
powder diffraction file (PDF) for 6-line ferrihydrite (PDF #29-
TABLE 1: Aluminum Content (mol % Substitution) and
Concentrations of Possible Contaminants (ppm) as
Determined Using ICP-MS
0
712) and the PDFs for the other iron oxides. Differential plots
were determined by subtracting the XRD patterns for the 0%
Al ferrihydrite from the Al-doped materials in order to assess
changes in lattice parameters as a result of the aluminum doping.
aluminum sodium arsenic
content
content content
synthesis
(mol %)
(ppm)
(ppm)
Samples for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were
prepared by diluting a small amount of the suspended particles
by ∼1000 times using Milli-Q water, sonicating the diluted
suspension, and placing one drop onto a 3 mm, 200 mesh holey
carbon-coated copper grid (SPI). The samples were then allowed
to air-dry. Images were collected using an FEI Tecnai T12 TEM
operated at 120 kV. All images were collected using a charge-
coupled device (CCD) camera and were analyzed using Gatan
Digital Micrograph 3.3.1. The surface area of the samples was
determined from length and width measurements of ap-
proximately 500 individual particles, which were modeled as
ellipsoids. Using the standard equation for the volume of an
ellipsoid and the equation for the surface area of a cigar-shaped
ellipsoid, the average surface area per average volume for the
particles was calculated. From the surface area per volume and
ferrihydrite, 0.48 M base
0.0
0.4
1.4
2.1
136
163
307
80
16
8
7
ferrihydrite w/5% Al, 0.48 M base
ferrihydrite w/20% Al, 0.48 M base
ferrihydrite w/30% Al, 0.60 M base
6
filters and into amber vials. The solutions were clear following
filtration, indicating that the solid was removed from the reaction
mixture. The filtered solutions were immediately analyzed using
high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), as described
below. The temperature was recorded at the beginning and end
of each reaction to ensure that it had remained stable, and each
reaction was performed in duplicate. Blanks were prepared in
an identical manner, but omitting the solid ferrihydrite sample.
HPLC Method. Filtrates were analyzed using an Agilent
HPLC equipped with a Zorbax C18 column. The mobile phase
was a 65:35 mixture of acetate buffer and acetonitrile, and a
flow rate of 0.75 mL/min and a 10 µL injection volume were
used. Hydroquinone eluted at 2.3 min and benzoquinone at 3.4
min. The absorbance at 235 nm was monitored, and eight-point
calibration curves, ranging from 5 to 1000 µM for hydroquinone
and 0.5 to 100 µM for benzoquinone, were used to determine
concentrations.
3
1
the density of ferrihydrite (3.96 g/cm ), the specific surface
area was calculated for each sample. TEM was used exclusively
for surface area determinations, as previous BET measurements
on ferrihydrites have demonstrated that such measurements are
unreliable, at best, for these materials.9
Kinetic Reactions. Each reaction used 50 mg of solid sample,
which was massed into a 60 mL amber glass vial (for heated
reactions) or a 30 mL Nalgene bottle (for cooled reactions) and
was placed in an anaerobic chamber (<100 ppm O2). Following
the addition of 5 mL of deoxygenated acetate buffer (40 mM,
pH 3.75, acetic acid (Mellinckrodt) and sodium hydroxide
Results and Discussion
ICP-MS. The composition of each ferrihydrite sample was
determined using ICP-MS (See Table 1). The amount of
aluminum present in each of the samples was substantially lower
than the percentage of aluminum in the original solutions. This
is most likely the result of the relatively high solubility of
aluminum, certainly as compared to ferric iron solubility, under
the conditions of the ferrihydrite synthesis. The concentrations
of possible contaminants (e.g., Na and As) were also measured
and found to be lower than parts per thousand.
XRD. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns show that
the materials prepared were consistent with the reference pattern
for 6-line ferrihydrite (Figure 1). No evidence for the presence
of other iron oxides was detected. In addition, no significant
(Titristar) in Milli-Q water), samples were sonicated, vortexed,
and stirred overnight to further reduce aggregation of the
particles. Nalgene bottles were wrapped in aluminum foil to
block light since benzoquinone is known to photodegrade. Prior
to reaction, an additional 19.5 mL of acetate buffer was added,
and the samples were placed into an ice bath or a silicon oil
bath heated to 30, 40, or 50 °C. After the temperature had
equilibrated, 0.5 mL of 10 mM hydroquinone (Sigma), which
was prepared using the deoxygenated acetate buffer, was added
to initiate the reaction and bring the total suspension volume to
1
2
5 mL. At regular time intervals, 1 mL aliquots of the reaction
mixture were quenched by filtration through 0.2 µm Acrodisc