accompanied by the same preference to locate the anion vacancies
within the structure along the short in-plane axis, although the
ordering in this case is not complete with 65% of the vacancies
along a and 35% along b. In contrast, the LaBaMnO4-x phases
exhibit tetragonal structures with anion vacancies disordered
throughout the MnO2-x equatorial planes. The difference in
vacancy arrangements between the phases can be rationalized by
considering the strain induced into the LaAMnO4-x structures on
reduction. As noted above, the equatorial Mn-O in-plane bonds
expand on reduction. This leads to a co-operative twisting of the
MnO6-x polyhedra to accommodate the mismatch between Mn-O
and A-O bond lengths in a manner analogous to the tolerance
factor driven octahedral tilting and twisting distortions observed
in cubic perovskite phases. The structural strain induced as a result
of the relatively small size of the La/Sr A-cation site drives the
alignment of the anion vacancies in the LaSrMnO4-x phases to
relieve this strain. The large ionic radius of Ba2+ compared to Sr2+
leads to significantly less strain and fully disordered structures for
LaBaMnO4-x phases.
The lack of long range anion vacancy order in LaSrMnO3.5
and LaBaMnO3.5 is in marked contrast to the iso-stoichiometric
phases Ca2MnO3.5 Sr2MnO3.5.12,13 These MnIII phases, prepared
by the reduction of Ca2MnO4 and Sr2MnO4 respectively, and
the structurally related phase Sr3Mn2O6 derived from the n = 2
Ruddlesden-Popper phase Sr3Mn2O7,21 have structures which can
be considered as the stacking of AO rock-salt layers and MnO1.5
anion deficient layers, in common with the LaAMnO3.5 phases
reported here. However the MnO1.5 layers present in Ca2MnO3.5,
Sr2MnO3.5 and Sr3Mn2O6 contain highly ordered arrays of anion
vacancies resulting in ordered sheets of corner-sharing, distorted
MnIIIO5 units. The lack of any evidence for long range anion
vacancy order in the LaAMnO3.5 phases is therefore a little
surprising. While none of the diffraction data collected from the
LaAMnO3.5 phases showed any evidence for three-dimensional
anion vacancy order, they do not rule out the possibility of two-
dimensional ordering within individual perovskite layers. In this
situation there would be rigorous order of the anion vacancies
within individual MnO1.5 layers, but no structural registry between
layers, in an analogy to the paracrystalline cation ordering model
proposed for La4LiMnO8.25 Such a two-dimensional ordering
scheme would be consistent with the larger inter-layer separa-
order at 155 K and 135 K for LaSrMnO3.5 and LaBaMnO3.5
respectively. The lack of any feature in the magnetisation data
collected from either phase at these transition temperatures, and
the very low absolute magnitude of the magnetisations observed,
suggests that rather than a transition from 3D antiferromag-
netism at low-temperature to paramagnetism at high-temperature,
these are transitions from 3D antiferromagnetic order to 2D
antiferromagnetically ordered states. Such a transition would
involve a change from a rigorously ordered 3D antiferromag-
netic arrangement of spins to a state where there was rigorous
antiferromagnetic order within each equatorial MnO1.5 sheet,
but no long range order in the relative arrangement of spins
between sheets. Such a 3D to 2D transition would have no
signature in a magnetisation measurement as the number of
unpaired spins does not change, only their relative orientation.
This model is supported by the observation that the 3D to 2D
transition occurs at a lower temperature in LaBaMnO3.5 than
LaSrMnO3.5 (135 K vs. 155 K), consistent with the larger interlayer
separation (6.82 A vs. 6.69 A) and thus weaker interlayer magnetic
coupling in the former phase. Parallels can be drawn between
the observed change in dimensionality of the magnetic order in
LaAMnO3.5 phases and that of the hexagonal BaMnO3-x phases
which also exhibit no, or very weak, magnetisation anomalies at
their 3D antiferromagnetic ordering temperatures.27 On raising
the temperature further, magnetisation data show a transition at
T~480 K for both LaAMnO3.5 phases. This is characterised as the
change from 2D antiferromagnetic to paramagnetic behaviour.
Such high magnetic ordering temperatures are not unexpected for
d5 MnII phases. For example BaMnO2 and Ba0.5Sr0.5MnO2 become
antiferromagnetically ordered at 350 K and 355 K respectively.28,29
In contrast the reported antiferromagnetic transition in Sr2MnO3.5
is 280 K.13 High magnetic ordering temperatures are known in per-
ovskite derived phases containing well connected arrays of other d5
transition metal centres such as FeIII (LnFeO3 620 < TN < 74030).
The ordering temperature of the FeIII phase structurally analogous
to LaAMnO3.5 phases, LaSrFeO4, is 350 K.31
˚
˚
In conclusion, the introduction of large numbers of MnII
centres into manganates with the K2NiF4 structure leads to a
significant rise in the magnetic coupling temperatures observed
in these phases. However, the large inter-layer separations in the
LaAMnO4-x phases result in 2D ordering, both magnetically and
crystallographically, with 3D magnetic order only observed at
much lower temperatures.
˚
tions observed in LaSrMnO3.5 and LaBaMnO3.5 (6.69 A and
˚
6.82 A respectively) compared with three-dimensionally ordered
˚
˚
˚
Ca2MnO3.5, Sr2MnO3.5 and Sr3Mn2O6 (6.11 A, 6.28 A and 6.22 A
respectively).12,13,21
Acknowledgements
The magnetization data collected from LaSrMnO3.67(3) are
consistent with paramagnetic behaviour at room temperature,
with a transition to glassy behaviour at T ~60–75 K. Spin glass
behaviour is consistent with the expected magnetic superexchange
coupling in a mixed MnII/III phase. Assuming the MnIII centres are
Jahn–Teller distorted and align their dz2 orbitals parallel to the
crystallographic z-axis, the in plane 180◦ exchange interactions
given by the Goodenough-Kanamori rules26 would be: MnIII-O-
MnIII antiferromagnetic; MnII-O-MnII antiferromagnetic; MnIII-
O-MnII ferromagnetic. In the absence of an ordered array of MnII
and MnIII centers, these magnetic couplings will lead to a frustrated
system and thus the glassy behaviour observed.
We thank R. Smith and E. Suard for assistance collecting the
neutron diffraction data. Experiments at the ISIS pulsed neutron
facility were supported by a beam time allocation from the Science
and Technology Facilities Council. We thank the EPSRC for
funding this work.
References
1 R. von Helmolt, J. Wecker, B. Holzapfel, L. Schultz and K. Sanwer,
Phys. Rev. Lett., 1993, 71, 2331.
2 K. Chahara, T. Ohno, M. Kasao and Y. Kozono, Appl. Phys. Lett.,
1993, 63, 1990.
3 P. Schiffer, A. P. Ramirez, W. Bao and S.-W. Cheong, Phys. Rev. Lett.,
1995, 75, 3336.
Low temperature neutron diffraction data show a clear tran-
sition to three-dimensional (3D) long range antiferromagnetic
6104 | Dalton Trans., 2010, 39, 6098–6105
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
©