D398
Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 159 (6) D393-D399 (2012)
6
5
4
3
2
1
00
one becomes reasonable. However, it should be noted that the effect
of the grain refinement of Sc-CO nickel coatings over conventional
Sc-CO2
2
Sc-CO with Saccharin
ones still prevails and causes the higher internal stress in the Sc-CO
coatings presented in Fig. 2.
2
2
00
00
00
00
00
0
Conventional
2
Furthermore, the internal stress of Sc-CO nickel coatings prepared
with the presence of saccharin in plating electrolyte should be eluci-
dated as well. As mentioned previously, the saccharin in the electrolyte
is usually co-deposited into coating. Once Saccharin is deposited into
coating, the molecules that locate around the grain boundaries play
the role as the foreign substance incorporation for lowering tensile
internal stress. The mechanism discussed here is similar to that of
compressive stress generation suggested by Hearne and Floro.39 On
the other hand, impurity-induced suppression of grain growth during
deposition can lead to an increase in the grain boundary energy per
23
volume. Hence, the grain boundary energy might be increased with
the incorporation of saccharin molecules in Ni coating. This can fur-
0
.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
2
ther decrease the parameter K comparing with that of Sc-CO plating
S
without saccharin. Thus, the more saccharin concentration in elec-
trolyte, the higher incorporated density in the coating. Consequently,
the measured internal stress fits better with lower K, as clearly ob-
served by the three isolated triangle points in Fig. 10, in which the
electrolyte were prepared with high saccharin concentration.
Figure 10. Crystal structure and Internal stress relationship of Ni electrode-
posits: K = 2.5 for conventional results, K = 1.0 for the Sc-CO2 results, and K
=
0.5 for the results of Saccharin effects. Films’ thicknesses are approximate
to 1μm.
Conclusions
By taking the effect of crystallographic orientation into account,
Eq. 5 can be modified as:
The experimental results in this work indicated that the internal
stress of the Ni deposit was sensitive to the parameters employed
in the Sc-CO electroplating process. The relationship between the
⎡
⎤
ꢃ
ꢄ
1
2
ꢆ
ꢇ
1
2
2
γ
sv − γgb
E
I111
⎣
⎦
2
σ
max
=
1
2
1
− υ I111 + I200 + I220 + I311
microstructure characteristics, mainly grain size and crystallographic
a
orientation, and the internal stress of nickel electrodeposits, estab-
lished with the proposed theoretical model, has correlated well to the
measurements. Furthermore, the higher plating pressure and the pres-
ence of surfactant in electrolyte increased the internal stress of the Ni
coating, respectively. Nevertheless, the internal stress of the coating
can be reduced by raising plating temperature, and increasing the cur-
rent density. Finally, the effects of saccharin in Sc-CO electroplating
2
on refining grains and reducing tensile stress remain unchanged over
in its conventional counterpart.
[
6]
where Ihkl is intergrated intensity of the {hkl} diffraction peak. The
first bracket term denotes for the effect of surface and grain boundary
energies associated with its grain size and the second one considers
for the effect of anisotropic Young’s modulus of the coating associated
with crystallographic orientation of grains. In order to correlate this
criterion with the experimental results, a parameter S is distilled from
Eq. 6:
ꢆ
ꢇ ꢆ
ꢇ
1
2
K
I
111
S =
[7]
1
2
I
111 + I200
Acknowledgments
a
In the above equation, S is defined as an internal stress parameter,
which accounts for both effects of grain size and its crystallographic
orientation. In the meantime, K is the constant accommodates for the
difference between surface energy and grain boundary energy per unit
film area. By using the parameter S in Eq. 7, the measurements of the
internal stress obtained from different plating methods are presented
in Fig. 10. Because the coatings prepared from different methods
may have different surface energy and grain boundary energy due to
different defects and impurity solution elements, different Ks need to
be employed for different plating methods and material systems. In
this work, K = 2.5 was applied for conventional method; K = 1.0 and
The partial financial support from National Science Council, Tai-
wan under the grant No. NSC 98-2221-E-027 -083 -MY3 is gratefully
acknowledged.
References
1. H. Yoshida, M. Sone, A. Mizushima, H. Yan, H. Wakabayashi, K. Abe, X. T. Tao,
S. Ichihara, and S. Miyata, Surf. Coat. Technol., 173, 285 (2003).
. H. Wakabayashi, N. Sato, M. Sone, U. Takada, H. Yan, K. Abe, K. Mizumoto,
S. Ichihara, and S. Miyata, Surf. Coat. Technol., 190, 200 (2005).
. T. F. M. Chang and M. Sone, Surf. Coat. Technol., 205, 3890 (2011).
4. T. F. M. Chang, M. Sone, A. Shibata, C. Ishiyama, and Y. Higo, Electrochimica Acta,
2
3
5
5, 6469 (2010).
K = 0.5 were implemented for Sc-CO
and without the addition of saccharin into Watts bath electrolyte. With
the chosen parameter S and K , the results in Fig. 10 clearly show the
2
electroplating methods with
5
. H. Yan, M. Sone, A. Mizushima, T. Nagai, K. Abe, S. Ichihara, and S. Miyata, Surf.
Coat. Technol., 187, 86 (2004).
s
6
. S. T. Chung, H. C. Huang, S. J. Pan, W. T. Tsai, P. Y. Lee, C. H. Yang, and M. B. Wu,
Corros. Sci., 50, 2614 (2008).
. S. T. Chung and W. T. Tsai, J. Electrochem. Soc., 156, D457 (2009).
. A. H. Romang and J. J. Watkins, Chem. Rev., 110, 459 (2010).
. V. C. Nguyen, C. Y. Lee, F. J. Chen, C. S. Lin, and T. Y. Liu, Surf. Coat. Technol.,
internal stress of the coating is closely related to the parameter S.
In the conventional nickel electroplating results, the incorporation
of hydrogen around grain boundaries (1–2 nm) had been observed
7
8
9
36
through the TEM micrograph. Once the occluded hydrogen diffused
and escaped from the coating, the tensile internal stress was increased
2
06–14, 3201 (2012).
10. A. M. Rashidi and A. Amadeh, Surf. Coat. Technol., 204, 353 (2009).
1. Y. Xuetao, W. Yu, S. Dongbai, and Y. Hongying, Surf. Coat. Technol., 202, 1895
1
6,32
1
accordingly.
ously, H /CO
inclusion of more H
the grain boundary energy of coating. Moreover, the surface energy
In the Sc-CO
was occluded into electrodeposits during plating. The
/CO bubbles around grain boundaries increases
2
electroplating, as mentioned previ-
(2008).
2
2
1
1
2. R. W. Hoffman, Thin Solid Films, 34, 185 (1976).
3. W. D. Nix and B. M. Clemens, J. Mater. Res., 14–8, 3467 (1999).
14. C. V. Thompson and R. Carel, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 44–5, 657 (1996).
5. S. C. Steel, C. V. Thompson, S. J. Hearne, and J. A. Floro, J. Appl. Phys., 88, 7079
2000).
6. C. S. Lin, C. Y. Lee, F. J. Chen, and W. C. Li, J. Electrochem. Soc., 152–6, 370
2005).
17. F. Czerwinski, J. Electrochem. Soc., 143–10, 3327 (1996).
8. L. Chang, C. H. Chen, and H. Fang, J. Electrochem. Soc., 155–1, D57 (2008).
2
2
37
38
1
of Ni {111} is smaller than those of Ni {100} and Ni {110}. Thus,
the Sc-CO
nickel coatings that possess less Ni {200} than the con-
ventional ones
the definition of K, i.e. the difference between surface energy and grain
boundary energy, a smaller K for Sc-CO plating than conventional
(
2
1
6,7,9
should have lower surface energy. By referring to
(
1
2