Topotactic Oxide Deintercalation
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 121, No. 38, 1999 8853
physical contact between reagents. Reduction of LaNiO3 to La2-
Ni2O5 did occur above 220 °C, when the reagents were
physically separated, presumably via mechanism a (decomposi-
tion of NaH to Na and H2), as the decomposition temperature
of NaH is 210 °C (defined as the temperature required to
two different substructures, the “perfect” infinite-layer model
(exhibiting NiO2-La-NiO2-La stacking) and a defect phase
(exhibiting defective layers of NiO2-LaO-NiO2). The super-
position observed in the second phase models regions of the
sample where the two stacking sequences have intergrown
intimately with each other, as shown in Figure 10. That is to
40
produce a hydrogen pressure of 10 mmHg ) and getter reactions
similar to mechanism b do not occur until much higher
temperatures (reaction between LaNiO3 and a Zr getter requires
say, the minority phase consists of defective NiO -LaO-NiO2
2
blocks inserted within a relaxed NiO -La-NiO -La stacking
2
2
4
a temperature of at least 400 °C ). The products obtained by
sequence.
the use of physically separate NaH, at temperatures where a
significant H2 partial pressure is present, agree well with those
found using H2(g).
The strain parallel to the stacking direction is over 4 times
that observed parallel to the NiO2 planes in the minority phase,
due to the significant mismatch in the c lattice parameters
Additional evidence to suggest mechanism c (diffusion
between solids) is occurring with the intimately mixed reagents
is provided by the observation that the rate of reaction is affected
by the sample size (large samples react more slowly), mixing
of reagents (poorly mixed samples react more slowly), and ratio
of NaH to LaNiO3 (increasing the amount of NaH with respect
to LaNiO3 increases the reaction rate at a given temperature).
All three observations indicate physical contact between the
reagents is required for reaction, suggesting the reduction occurs
via diffusion between solids (c) rather than via a gaseous
intermediate (a, b). The key point is that LaNiO2 is not formed
by either route (flowing H2 or separated reagents within a sealed
tube) involving gas-phase hydrogen as a reducing agent.
Analysis of neutron powder diffraction and high-resolution
electron microscopy data has shown that LaNiO2+x has a defect
microstructure which requires a significant modification of the
infinite-layer model, proposed by Crespin et al., in a manner
not previously observed in the defect chemistry of infinite-layer
cuprates.
(
stacking repeat length) between the intergrowing sequences ((c-
defect(Ni-O-Ni)/c-perfect(Ni-vacancy-Ni) ) 1.46), which
results in a considerable strain in the stacking direction,
compared to the small strain within the NiO2 planes ((a-defect/
a-perfect) ) 0.996). The combination of both anisotropic particle
size and uniaxial strain leads to the highly anisotropic diffraction
peak widths observed for this phase.
The coordination around nickel in the minority phase must
be discussed in terms of two sites. (a) Site Ni1, the majority
(
exhibit square-planar coordination with bond lengths very
similar to those of the majority phase (1.972 Å as opposed to
1
62.3%) of the nickel atoms in this phase occupy this site and
.979 Å in the majority phase). (b) Site Ni2, a disordered site
displaced due to its proximity to an interlamellar oxide ion (O3).
The Ni2 position has four in-plane oxygen contacts (Ni2-O2)
of 1.972 Å, and the symmetry of the P4/mmm space group also
generates two Ni2-O3 bond lengths (1.00 and 2.46 Å). However,
Ni(I) would be expected to exhibit a large Jahn-Teller distortion
(
cf. La2CuO4); therefore, all Ni2-O3 bond lengths should be
The refined structure consists of two tetragonal phases with
similar a lattice parameters but significantly different c lattice
parameters due to the incorporation of interlamellar oxide ion
defects. The first is a highly ordered phase which has the
considerably in excess of 1.979 Å. The shorter Ni2-O3 bond
length is thus rejected as unphysical, reinforcing the picture of
the minority phase as the superposition of two constituent
phases, as shown in Figures 8 and 9. Ni2 thus adopts square-
pyramidal coordination, consistent with a large Jahn-Teller
distortion at Ni(I). The ratio Ni-Oaxial/Ni-Oequatorial (Ni2-O2/
Ni2-O3) refined for the minority lanthanum nickelate phase is
“
perfect” infinite-layer structure and is observed to exist in
crystalline domains which have far larger dimensions in the ab
plane of the material than in a direction parallel to the stacking
direction (c axis) (Table S1).
1
.247, which compares well with a value of 1.289 for La2CuO4
I
At first sight, the Ni -O bond lengths for the majority phase
43
(four- plus two-coordination) and an average value of 1.202
I
(
1.979 Å) are among the longest reported for Ni in the solid
for the Cu-O bond lengths in YBa2Cu3O7-x (square-pyramidal
coordination). All interatomic contacts to O3 should be viewed
in the light of the large rms displacement of this ion (0.28 Å).
The defective regions, therefore, correspond to the insertion of
vertex-linked NiO5 square pyramids into the stacking sequence.
state. However, it should be noted that there are very few
examples suitable for direct comparison with the infinite sheets
44
I
found here, as most reported Ni oxides display either strikingly
different coordinations, for example the linear NiO2 units in
4
1
(
K,Rb)Na2NiO2 (Ni-O ) 1.77 Å ), or significant disorder in
By analysis of the other metal-oxygen bond lengths (La1-
O2 for example) and rejection of the physically unreasonable
short contacts, it becomes clear that a model of the local
structure around a defect NiO2-LaO-NiO2 block can be
constructed, from the refined minority phase, as shown in Figure
42
the nickel coordination shell, e.g. LaSrNiO3.1 or the LnSr5-
5
I
Ni3O8 phases. When only the Ni -O distances to fully ordered
oxygen sites are considered, the refined bond length for the
stoichiometric LaNiO2 appears to be reasonable (the nondisor-
I
42
dered Ni -O bond length in LaSrNiO3.1 is 2.04 Å; nondis-
9
a. The apparent compression of the NiO2-La-NiO2 blocks
I
ordered Ni -O bond lengths in LnSr5Ni3O8 range from 1.995(7)
directly adjacent to the defect layer is exaggerated in this
scheme, however, due to the imposition of a common c lattice
parameter onto the intergrowth of the two stacking units. The
refined positions of the NiO2 layers, constructed from Ni1 and
O1, should therefore be considered a weighted average of
positions summed over the locally relaxed NiO2-La-NiO2
matrix. Evidence for this can be seen in the large displacement
factors associated with Ni1 and O1. The rms displacements of
5
Å for Ln ) Ho to 1.986(7) Å for Ln ) Y ).
The second tetragonal phase deviates significantly from the
“perfect” infinite-layer model, exhibiting disordering of the NiO2
planes driven by the presence of additional interlamellar oxide
ions which change the average stoichiometry of the phase to
LaNiO2.09(1). Closer inspection shows that the disorder in this
phase can be more accurately viewed as the superposition of
(
40) Greenwood, N. N.; Earnshaw, A. Chemistry of the Elements, 2nd
ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, U.K., 1997; p 66.
41) Burow, W.; Birx, J.; Bernhardt, F.; Hoppe, R. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.
993, 619, 923.
42) Crespin, M.; Landron, C.; Odier, P.; Bassat, J. M.; Mouron, P.;
Choisnet, J. J. Solid State Chem. 1992, 100, 281.
(43) Longo, J. M.; Raccah, P. H. J. Solid State Chem. 1973, 414, 526.
(44) David, W. I. F.; Harrison, W. T. A.; Gunn, J. M. F.; Moze, O.;
Soper, A. K.; Day, P.; Jorgensen, J. D.; Hinks, D. G.; Beno, M. A.;
Soderholm, L.; Capone, D. W.; Schuller, I. K.; Segre, C. U.; Zhang, K.;
Grace, J. D. Nature 1987, 327, 310.
(
1
(