Y. Soumare et al. / Solid State Communications 151 (2011) 284–288
287
nanowires and nano-chains [17,18]. The high remanence confirms
a very good orientation of the nanowires in the frozen solution in
agreement with previous studies on Ni nanowires arrays grown
in porous alumina membranes [19]. The magnetization behavior
shows that the magnetic easy axis lies along the wires’ longest axis
due to the strong shape anisotropy. The coercivity of elongated
particles arrays depends on the magnetization reversal mecha-
nism that is related to several parameters like the coherence length
with respect to the wire diameter, the presence of crystalline
defects and also dipolar interaction. The maximum of coercivity on
Ni wires arrays has been observed on 18 nm-diameter nanowires
(i.e. Hc = 950 Oe) [19]. It has been demonstrated that the coer-
civity decreases when the nanowire diameter increases. It reaches
a value of 200 Oe for a nanowire of 50 nm in diameter. Our mea-
surements confirm such a decrease. However, despite their higher
diameter (200 nm) the Ni nanowires described in this paper
present a larger coercivity (385 Oe).
4. Conclusion
Fig. 6. Magnetization (SQUID) of: (a) Ni disoriented nanowires and (b) Ni
nanoparticles.
Ni nanowires have been obtained by a simple synthesis process
which does not require the use of host matrix, surfactant or
strong reducing agent such as hydrazine or hydrogen. This method
combines the effect of reduction and growth in solution of
nanoparticles by the polyol process with the application of an
external magnetic field during nucleation and growth processes.
It also allows the synthesis of large quantities of powder Ni
nanowires, with very high yields. The average diameter of the
nanowire is between 100 and 300 nm and the length is several
micrometers. Obtaining these nanowires is conditioned by a fine
control of the concentration of sodium and the value of the
magnetic field applied during synthesis. They crystallize in the
face-centered cubic (fcc) structure and exhibit enhanced magnetic
properties if they are aligned.
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by the Region Ile-de-France
in the framework of C’Nano IdF. C’Nano IdF is the nanoscience
competence center of Paris Region, supported by CNRS, CEA, MESR
and Region Ile-de-France.
Fig. 7. Magnetization (SQUID) of the Ni nanowires: (a) nanowires aligned by an
external magnetic field and subsequently frozen.; (b) disoriented nanowires.
References
[1] C.Y. Yu, Y.L. Yu, H.Y. Sun, T. Xu, X.H. Li, W. Li, Z.S. Gao, X.Y. Zhang, Mater. Lett.
61 (2007) 1859.
nickel nanoparticles elaborated in a polyol medium [16]. The fer-
romagnetic behavior of the Ni nanowires shows important dif-
ferences from that found for the isotropic nanparticles. Indeed
the ferromagnetic character of the nanowires depends on their
orientation with respect to the magnetic field applied during mag-
netic measurements. Indeed nanowires randomly orientated (i.e. a
‘spaghetti-like system’) present remanence and coercivity quite
close to that observed for the isotropic nanoparticles (Mr /Ms 0.27
and Hc of 214 Oe) (Fig. 6). Whereas oriented Ni nanowires, frizzed
along the field directions in a non-magnetic matrix, have a real
enhancement of their magnetic character when their orientation is
parallel with the magnetic field applied during the measurements.
It is probably important to remind that nanowires are frozen in a
non-magnetic solid matrix under the application of a high external
field so that they are all parallel with the direction of the magnetic
field applied during the solidification. Once the matrix is at 140 K
(i.e. solid) magnetic measurements are done as function of the
applied magnetic field parallel with the frizzed nanowires direc-
tion. Indeed, as shown in Fig. 7, oriented nanowires present a
remanence Mr = 0.85 Ms and a coercivity Hc = 385 Oe. The Hc
value is in good agreement with that previously reported for Ni
[2] R. Sanz, M. Hernandez-Velez, K.R. Pirota, Small 3 (2007) 434.
[3] (a) P.M. Paulus, F. Luis, M. Kröll, G. Schmid, L.J. de Jongh, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
224 (2001) 180;
(b) H. Zeng, R. Skomski, L. Menon, Y. Liu, S. Bandyopadhyay, D.J. Sellmyer,
Phys. Rev. B 65 (2002) 134426.
[4] (a) J.-Y. Piquemal, G. Viau, P. Beaunier, F. Bozon-Verduraz, F. Fiévet, Mater.
Res. Bull. 38 (2003) 389;
(b) L.M. Worboys, P.P. Edwards, P.A. Anderson, Chem. Commun. (2002) 2894;
(c) Y.-J. Han, J.M. Kim, G.D. Stucky, Chem. Mater. 12 (2000) 2068.
[5] (a) J. Sloan, D.M. Wright, H.-G. Woo, S. Bailey, G. Brown, A.P.E. York,
K.S. Coleman, J.L. Hutchison, M.L.H. Green, Chem. Commun. (1999) 699;
(b) A. Govindaraj, B.C. Satishkumar, M. Nath, C.N.R. Rao, Chem. Mater. 12
(2000) 202.
[6] F. Dumestre, B. Chaudret, C. Amiens, P. Renaud, P. Fejes, Science 303 (2004)
821.
[7] P. Liu, Z. Li, B. Zhao, B. Yadian, Y. Zhang, Mater. Lett. 63 (2009) 1650.
[8] A. Dakhlaoui, L.S. Smiri, G. Babadjian, F. Schoenstein, P. Molinié, N. Jouini,
J. Phys. Chem. C 112 (2008) 14348.
[9] L. Poul, S. Ammar, N. Jouini, F. Fiévet, F. Villain, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 26
(1–2–3) (2003) 261.
[10] C. Feldmann, M. Roming, K. Trampert, Small 2 (2006) 1248.
[11] N. Chakroune, G. Viau, C. Ricolleau, F. Fiévet-Vincent, F. Fiévet, J. Mater. Chem.
13 (2003) 312.
[12] (a) F. Fiévet, J.-P. Lagier, M. Figlarz, MRS Bull. 14 (1989) 29;
(b) G. Viau, F. Fiévet-Vincent, F. Fiévet, Solid State Ion. 84 (1996) 259;
(c) P. Toneguzzo, G. Viau, O. Acher, F. Fiévet-Vincent, F. Fiévet, Adv. Mater. 10
(1998) 1032.