in different samples were obtained by normalizing the kinetic
currents at 0.9 V to the electrochemically active areas (ECAs)
and compared in the inset of Fig. 3A. To avoid the interference
of hydrogen absorption in calculating the hydrogen adsorption
charge, the ECAs of Pd were obtained by integrating the
stripping charge of a Cu monolayer underpotentially deposited
on Pd, assuming 420, 490, and 460 mC cmꢀ2 for full Cu
monolayer coverage on cubes, octahedra, and cubo-octahedra,
respectively (Fig. S6 in ESIw).12,13 The specific activities of
Pd/C cubes, Pd/C octahedra, and Pd/C-HT were 0.31, 0.033
and 0.055 mA cmꢀ2, respectively. The activity enhancement of
Pd cubes was about 10 and 6 times over Pd/C octahedra and
Pd/C-HT, respectively. The Pd/C cubes were even more active
than the state-of-the-art Pt/C catalysts (TKK, 46.6 wt%) with
an average particle size of 2.8 nm, and comparable to Pt/C-HT
with a similar size range for the particles (TKK, 50 wt%,
7 nm). Our results demonstrate that Pd(100) sites are much
more active than Pd(111) at the nanoscale, consistent with the
extended surface study.7
{100} facets being much more active than the {111} facets. The
activity of Pd cubes was even comparable to that of the
state-of-the-art Pt electrocatalysts. With a much lower price
for Pd ($654.1/Oz.) as compared to Pt ($1796.9/Oz.), the cost
of fuel cells could be considerably lowered by switching from
Pt- to Pd-based catalysts.9 We believe that our results are also
important to guide the design of more active catalysts for fuel
cells and other applications. Further work on the catalytic
activity of Pd cubes will address the question of their fuel cell
performance and long-term stability.
This work was supported by UTC Power. As a visiting
student from Xiamen University, M.J. was also partially
supported by the China Scholarship Council. Part of the work
was performed at the Nano Research Facility (NRF), a
member of the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure
Network (NNIN), which is supported by the NSF under
award no. ECS-0335765.
Notes and references
The ORR kinetics is controlled by the amount of available
active sites on the catalyst’s surface and the interaction
between the surface and oxygen-containing species (e.g., O2,
O, OH, and OOH).14,15 The chemisorbed OH (OHad) acts as a
poison species in the potential range where oxygen reduction is
under combined kinetic-diffusion control, since it blocks the
surface sites for O2 adsorption.1,14 The anodic branches of the
voltammetry curves (0.65–0.9 V) for Pd/C cubes, Pd/C
octahedra and Pd/C-HT after subtracting the double layer
currents are compared in Fig. 3B. The onset potential of OHad
formation for both Pd octahedra and Pd/C-HT was B0.7 V,
which is more than 50 mV lower than that on Pd cubes
(40.75 V). The coverage of OHad (yOH) on the Pd surface
was calculated and also compared in Fig. 3B. It’s clear that the
OHad coverage on Pd cubes was much lower than other
surfaces in the potential range 4 0.7 V. Thus, the higher
ORR activity on Pd cubes can be attributed to its lower OHad
coverage and consequently more available reaction sites.
In summary, we thoroughly studied the structure dependence
of ORR activity for shape-controlled Pd nanocrystals with a
particle size B6 nm. The Pd cubes enclosed by {100} facets
were one order of magnitude more active than Pd octahedra
enclosed by {111} facets towards ORR. Our results demon-
strated that the ORR activity was strongly dependent on the
atomic structure on the surface of a Pd nanocatalyst with the
1 H. A. Gasteiger, S. S. Kocha, B. Sompalli and F. T. Wagner, Appl.
Catal., B, 2005, 56, 9.
2 W. Vielstich, A. Lamm and H. A. Gasteiger, Handbook of Fuel
Cells-Fundamentals, Technology and Applications, John Wiley &
Sons, Chichester, 2003, vol. 1–4.
3 R. R. Adzic, in Electrocatalysis, ed. J. Lipkowski and P. N. Ross,
Wiley, New York, 1998, pp. 197.
4 F. El Kadiri, R. Faure and R. Durand, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1991,
301, 177.
5 N. M. Markovic, R. R. Adzic, B. D. Cahan and E. B. Yeager,
J. Electroanal. Chem., 1994, 377, 249.
6 V. R. Stamenkovic, B. Fowler, B. S. Mun, G. Wang, P. N.
Ross, C. A. Lucas and N. M. Markovic, Science, 2007, 315,
493.
7 S. Kondo, M. Nakamura, N. Maki and N. Hoshi, J. Phys. Chem.
C, 2009, 113, 12625.
8 L. Xiao, L. Zhuang, Y. Liu, J. Lu and H. D. Abruna, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2008, 131, 602.
9 M. Shao, J. Power Sources, 2011, 196, 2433.
10 M. Shao, K. Sasaki and R. R. Adzic, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128,
3526.
11 M. Jin, H. Liu, H. Zhang, Z. Xie, J. Liu and Y. Xia, Nano Res.,
2011, 4, 83.
12 T. Chierchie and C. Mayer, Electrochim. Acta, 1988, 33, 341.
13 J. Okada, J. Inukai and K. Itaya, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2001,
3, 3297.
14 N. M. Markovic, T. J. Schmidt, V. R. Stamenkovic and
P. N. Ross, Fuel Cells, 2001, 1, 105.
15 J. K. Norskov, J. Rossmeisl, A. Logadottir, L. Lindqvist,
J. R. Kitchin, T. Bligaard and H. Jonsson, J. Phys. Chem. B,
2004, 108, 17886.
c
6568 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 6566–6568
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011