11920 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 111, No. 41, 2007
Shoji and Hirayama
(2) Eichenbaum, G. M.; Kiser, P. F.; Simon, S. A.; Needham, D.
Macromolecules 1998, 31, 5084-5093.
(3) Tanaka, T.; Fillmore, D.; Sun, S. T.; Nishio, I.; Swislow, G.; Shah,
A. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1980, 45, 1636-1639.
(4) Harmona, M. E.; Tangb, M.; Frank, C. W. Polymer 2003, 44 (16),
4547-4556.
(5) Millet, P.; Pineri, M.; Durand, R. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1989, 19,
162-166.
(6) Sadeghipour, K.; Salomon, R.; Neogi, S. Smart Mater. Struct. 1992,
1, 172-179.
(7) Oguro, K.; Asaka, K.; Takenaka, H. In Proceedings of the 4th
International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science; IEEE
Press: Piscataway, NJ, 1993; p 39.
(8) Asaka, K.; Oguro, K.; Nishimura, Y.; Mizuhata, M.; Tanaka, H.
Polym. J. 1995, (27), 436-440.
(9) Shahinpoor, M.; Bar-Cohen, Y.; Simpson, J. O.; Smith, J. Smart
Mater. Struct. 1998, 7 (6), R15-R30.
(10) Onishi, K.; Sewa, S.; Asaka, K.; Fujiwara, N.; Oguro, K. Electro-
chim. Acta 2001, 46 (8), 1233-1241.
(11) Kim, K. J.; Shahinpoor, M. Polymer 2002, 43, 797-802.
(12) Noh, T.-G.; Tak, Y.; Nam, J.-D.; Choi, H. Electrochim. Acta 2002,
47, 2341-2346.
(13) Jung, K.; Nam, J.; Choi, H. Sens. Actuators A 2003, 107, 183-
192.
(14) Baughman, R. H. Synth. Met. 1996, 78 (3), 339-353.
(15) Mazzoldi, A.; Santa, A. D.; Rossi, D. D. In Polymer Sensors and
Actuators; Osada, Y., De Rossi, D. E., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg,
Germany, 1999.
(16) Kaneko, M.; Fukui, M.; Takashima, W.; Kaneto, K. Synth. Met.
1997, 84, 795-796.
(17) Madden, J. D.; Cush, R. A.; Kanigan, T. S.; Brenan, C. J.; Hunter,
I. W. Synth. Met. 1999, 105, 61-64.
(18) Kawano, Y.; Wang, Y.; Palmer, R. A.; Aubuchon, S. R. Polim.:
Cienc. Tecnol. 2002, 12 (2), 96-101.
(19) Shahinpoor, M.; Kim, K. J. Smart Mater. Struct. Int. J. 2005, 14
(1), 197-214.
(20) Heitner-Wirguin, C.; Bauminger, E. R.; A., L.; Kanter, F. B.; Ofer,
S. Polymer 1980, 21, 1327-1329.
Figure 9. Force measurement of a Nafion-Pt-based actuator at 40%
RH. The potential was scanned from 0 to 3.5 V at 50 mV/s. (A) The
maximum force was evaluated at 3.5 V, and then the potential was set
to 0 V to record a negative force generation. (B) Dependence of the
force at 3.5 V on the humidity. The experimental procedure was the
same as for A, and the force was evaluated at various humidities.
(21) Hsu, W. Y.; Timothy, T. D.; Gierke, D. Macromolecules 1982,
15, 101-105.
humidity (water uptake) has to be carefully considered to obtain
the maximum performance of IPMC-type actuators.
(22) Enikov, E. T.; Seo, G. S. Sens. Actuators A 2005, 122, 264-272.
(23) Lee, J. H.; Lee, J. H.; Nam, J.-D.; Choi, H.; Jung, K.; Jeon, J. W.;
Lee, Y. K.; Kim, K. J.; Tak, Y. Sens. Actuators A 2005, 118, 98-106.
Conclusion
(24) Shahinpoor, M. In Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Smart
Structures and Materials; SPIE Press: Bellingham, WA, 1993; Vol. 1916,
pp 40-50.
(25) Shahinpoor, M. In Proceedings of SPIE Conferences on Electro-
actiVe Polymer Actuators and DeVices; SPIE Press: Bellingham, WA, 1999;
Vol. 3669, pp 109-121.
(26) Kanno, R.; Kurata, A.; Hattori, M.; Tadokoro, S.; Takamori, T. In
Proceedings of the Japan-U.S.A. Symposium on Flexible Automation;
ISCIE/ASME: New York, 1994; Vol. 2, pp 691-698.
(27) Kanno, R.; Tadokoro, S.; Takamori, T.; Hattori, M. In Proceedings
of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; IEEE
Press: Piscataway, NJ, 1996; Vol. 1, pp 219-225.
(28) Bao, X.; Bar-Cohen, Y.; Lih, S. In Proceedings of the SPIE Smart
Structures and Materials Symposium; SPIE Press: Bellingham, WA, 2002;
pp 4695-4727.
(29) Nemat-Nasser, S.; Li, J. Y. J. Appl. Phys. 2000, 87 (7), 3321-
3331.
Both forward and reverse displacements were dramatically
enhanced by humidity. For instance, the forward displacement
at 90% RH was nearly 10 times larger than the displacement at
30% RH. The primary reason for this observation is a decrease
in stiffness resulting from water uptake. Here, water molecules
were added to each sulfonate group, and at higher humidities,
all regions of the membrane were condensed by water until the
resulting pressure within its clusters was balanced. The hydraulic
effect involves electro-osmotic effects that are derived from the
migration of ions. These events enhance the velocity of the
displacement and also promote a reverse relaxation process. The
reverse relaxation process does not involve a major redistribution
of counter cations. A reverse relaxation was also recognized
during force generation, and this relaxation was dramatically
sensitive to the humidity. During continuous force loading, the
accumulated internal stress in the film gives a negative force.
These results are consistent with the view that the bending
phenomena are a result of the balance of internal stress and
water transport in the film.
(30) Shahinpoor, M.; Kim, K. J. Smart Mater. Struct. 2004, 13 (6),
1362-1388.
(31) Kucernak, A. R.; Muir, B. Electrochim. Acta 2001, 46, 1313-1322.
(32) Takenaka, H.; Torikai, E.; Kawami, Y.; Wakabayashi, N. Int. J.
Hydrogen Energy 1982, 7, 397-403.
(33) Shahinpoor, M. Electrochim. Acta 2003, 48 (14-16), 2343-2353.
(34) Nemat-Nasser, S.; Wu, Y. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 93 (9), 5255-5267.
(35) James, P. J.; Elliott, J. A.; McMaster, T. J.; Newton, J. M.; Elliott,
A. M. S.; Miles, M. J.; Hanna, S. J. Mater. Sci. 2000, 35, 5111-5119.
(36) Nemat-Nasser, S. J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 92 (5), 2899-2915.
(37) Shahinpoor, M. Electrochim. Acta 2003, 48 (14-16), 2343-2353.
(38) Bar-Cohen, Y. ElectroactiVe Polymer (EAP) Actuators as Artificial
Muscles; SPIE Press, 2001.
Acknowledgment. This work was partially supported by
research grants from the University of Fukui.
References and Notes
(1) Osada, Y.; Gong, J. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1993, (18), 187.