M. Badea et al.
disadvantage of KP1019 in its development as anticancer
agent represented by the poor water solubility was solved
by transformation in sodium salt that results in an increase
of 35 times of the solubility compared to the parent com-
pound [6].
enrofloxacin, enoxacin, respectively) was suspended in
10 mL of distilled water and neutralised with 0.2 mL of
2 M sodium hydroxide aqueous solution in a 1:2 molar
ratio of complex to NaOH. The resulting solution was
concentrated on the water bath near dryness, cooled on ice,
and ethanol was added to yield a brown solid. The resulting
precipitate was collected by filtration, washed with ethanol
and air-dried.
The second class of ruthenium (III) compounds consists
in dimethyl sulfoxide-ruthenium (III) complexes with
metastatic activity [7]. The most active compounds of this
series are Na{trans-[Ru(III)Cl (dmso)(Him)]} (Him = im-
4
idazole) - NAMI, and [H im][trans-Ru(III)Cl (dmso)
2
4
Instruments
(Him)] - NAMI-A. NAMI, that belongs to a series of with
general formula Na[trans-RuC1 (R R SO)(L)], where R
1-
4
1
2
The chemical analyses were performed on a PerkinElmer
PE 2400 analyser (for C, H, N, S) and a Shimadzu AA
R SO = dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or tetramethylene
2
sulfoxide (TMSO), L is a nitrogen donor ligand: imidazole
6300 spectrometer (for Ru and Na).
(
Im), oxazole (Ox), indazole (Ind), isoquinoline (Iq) [8], has
IR spectra were recorded in KBr pellets with a FT-IR
an intense action on lung metastases [9–11]. Although the
sodium salts of the anionic derivatives are slightly soluble in
water, the reproducibility of their formulation is sometimes
affected by the tendency to crystallise with DMSO and ace-
tone molecules in variable proportions. Reproducible results
VERTEX 70 (Bruker) spectrometer in the range
1
-
400–4000 cm
.
Electronic spectra by diffuse reflectance technique, with
MgO as standard, were recorded in the range 200–900 nm,
on a Jasco V 650 spectrophotometer.
?
?
4
are obtained with the LH and NEt salts, as it is NAMI-A.
Mass spectrometry measurements were performed with
THERMO PHINNIGAN MAT-900 mass spectrometer
with FAB (THERMO-FINNIGAN) ionisation source
operating in positive mode. Samples were dissolved in a
matrix on nitrobenzyl alcohol. Molecular ions scanning
range (m/z) was 0–1250.
This study is aimed to obtain soluble sodium salts of some
ruthenium (III) complexes with quinolone antibiotics. The
parent compounds, formulated as RuCl (HL) (DMSO)
m
3
2
(
H O) (HL: pipemidic acid, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin,
2 n
ofloxacin, levofloxacin, enrofloxacin, enoxacin) [12, 13]
were transformed in their corresponding soluble sodium salts
withgeneralformula Na RuCl (L) (DMSO) (EtOH) (H O)
p
The thermoanalytical curves (TG and DTA) were
recorded using a Labsys 1200 SETARAM instrument, with
a sample mass of 13–22 mg over the temperature range of
2
3
2
m
n
2
by neutralisation with sodium hydroxide. The obtained
sodium salts were characterised by microanalytical, spectro-
metric methods (IR, UV–Vis, mass spectrometry) and thermal
analysis. Having in view a possible application as drugs, the
thermal analysis is required in order to develop proper drug
conditioning and storage methods. As a result, the thermal
analysis (TG, DTG and DTA) of the complexes was per-
formed in order to establish temperature range of compounds
thermal stability. This method also allowed us to confirm the
proposed formulas of complexes and to elucidate the number
and nature of the solvent molecules.
-
1
3
0–900 °C, using a heating rate of 10 K min . The
measurements were carried out in synthetic air atmosphere
3 -1
flow rate 17 cm min ) by using alumina crucibles. The
(
calibration of TG equipment was run both with gold (m.
p. 1064 ± 1 °C) and ultrapure CuSO Á5H O (99.9 %) with
4
2
a measurement error of 0.1 %.
The X-ray powder diffraction patterns were collected on
a DRON-3 diffractometer with a nickel-filtered Cu Ka
˚
radiation (k = 1.5418 A) in 2h range of 5°–70°, a step
width of 0.05° and an acquisition time of 2 s per step.
Na [RuCl (pip) (DMSO)]ÁEtOH
(Hpip = pipemidic
acid) (1) Analysis found: C, 39.54; H, 4.87; N, 13.96; S,
.66; Ru, 10.15; Na, 4.28 %; calculated for C H Cl
2 44 3-
2
3
2
Experimental
Materials
3
3
N Na O RuS: C, 39.12; H, 4.52; N, 14.26; S 3.26; Ru,
1
0
2 8
1
0.29; Na, 4.68 %. Reaction yield: 94 %.
Na [RuCl (enx) (DMSO)]ÁEtOHÁ3H O (Henx = enox-
2
3
2
2
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, reagent
grade and were used without further purification.
acin) (2) Analysis found: C, 38.18; H, 4.37; N, 9.98; S,
2.80; Ru, 9.12; Na 3.99 %; calculated for C H Cl F
34 50 3 2-
N Na O RuS: C, 38.15; H, 4.72; N, 10.47; S 2.94; Ru,
8 2 11
Synthesis of complexes
9.44; Na 4.29 %. Reaction yield: 79 %.
Na [RuCl (nf) (DMSO)]ÁEtOHÁH O (Hnf = norfloxacin)
2
3
2
2
0
.2 mmol of each parent neutral complex of general for-
(
3) Analysis found: C, 41.95; H, 4.14; N, 7.89; S, 3.48; Ru,
mula RuCl (HL) (DMSO) (H O) (HL: pipemidic acid,
3
2
m
2
n
9
.29; Na, 4.11 %; calculated for C H Cl F N Na O RuS:
36 48 3 2 6 2 9
norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin,
1
23