Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 149 ͑7͒ G399-G402 ͑2002͒
the third mode, Si-B-TM, an intermittent supply of Si H followed
G401
2
6
by B H6 and the TM process is also examined. Finally, in mode
2
B-TM-Si-TM, B H is supplied intermittently followed by TM, and
2
6
Si H is supplied intermittently followed by TM. These modes were
2
6
repeated for 600 cycles, and the characteristics of the grown layer
were measured.
The duration of Si H and B H supply was 4 s, and the pauses
2
6
2
6
were constant at 1 s in all modes. In the TM process, the heating
time from TL to TH was 6 s at the rate of 11.6°/s, and the cooling
time was 5 s at 14.0°/s with 0 s of retention.
Figure 3 shows the carrier concentration and the growth rate per
cycle of boron-doped film grown by each mode. In each mode, the
volumes of Si H and B H ͑5% B H in N ͒ supply are constant at
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
1
.8 and 0.5 sccm, respectively. In spite of the same amount of B H
2 6
supply in one cycle of each mode, the difference among modes was
considerable. The highest carrier concentration in the grown film
was obtained in the B-TM-Si-TM mode, followed by the B-Si-TM
mode, whereas the films grown in the (Si ϩ B)-TM and Si-B-TM
modes showed about one order lower carrier concentration. Since
the growth rates were not greatly influenced in each mode, the Si-H
adsorption process might not be influenced by the coverage of boron
compound. However, the coverage of boron compounds formed af-
ter B H supply is influenced by the mode. The grown surface was
2
6
atomically flat, and the epitaxial layer was selectively grown on the
Figure 5. Relationship between Hall mobility and the carrier concentration
of boron-doped p-type film for each doping mode.
Si surface; no deposition occurred on the patterned SiO mask. This
2
tendency was observed independently of the mode of growth. In
addition, single-crystalline film growth on the Si͑100͒ surface was
confirmed by reflection high-energy electron diffraction ͑RHEED͒
measurement.
heavy doping of above 5 ϫ 1020 cmϪ3 of carrier concentration in
The dependences of the carrier concentration of a boron-doped
mode B-TM-Si-TM with 1 sccm B H supply, the segregation of
p-type layer on B H supply in each mode are shown in Fig. 4. The
2
6
2
6
boron is assumed to occur because the Hall mobility decreases as
carrier concentration in each mode increased with increasing B H
2
6
the B H supply increases. Details of the behavior of segregated
supply in the range up to 0.5 sccm. A high carrier concentration was
achieved by growth in modes B-Si-TM and B-TM-Si-TM, in this
range of B H supply. This result means higher doping efficiency
2
6
boron will be discussed in another paper.
2
6
may be realized by supplying B H to the growing surface just after
Conclusions
2
6
the TM process. The surface after the TM is assumed to be fresh,
because the adsorption species of the materials and by-products, for
example, can release from the surface by higher temperature TM
process. Therefore, boron compound incorporation from B H on
We achieved TM Si MLE growth with doping by intermittently
supplying Si H and dopant precursor B H to induce p-type growth
on Si͑100͒. TM Si MLE under the conditions of an intermittent
2
6
2
6
2
6
Si H supply at 400°C followed by the TM process at 470°C en-
2
6
the surface after TM can be increased in modes B-Si-TM and
abled the growth of an atomically flat surface with layer-by-layer
B-TM-Si-TM. In addition, in these modes, supply of excess B H ,
2
6
growth in a self-limiting manner on Si͑100͒. B H was introduced at
2
6
as occurs at 1 sccm, leads to the decrease of carrier concentration.
This means that the amount of nonactive boron electrically increases
with increasing amount of B H under excess supply.
a predetermined timing of supply in several doping modes in TM Si
MLE. The higher carrier concentration was achieved by supplying
B H to the growing surface just after the TM process, in growth
2
6
2
6
On the other hand, over one order of magnitude lower carrier
concentration was obtained in modes (B ϩ Si)-TM and Si-B-TM
than in modes B-Si-TM and B-TM-Si-TM. This indicates that an
interactive competitive adsorption occurs between a boron com-
pound and a silicon compound in mode (B ϩ Si)-TM, because
B H and Si H are introduced at the same time on a fresh surface
modes B-Si-TM and B-TM-Si-TM. The carrier concentration of
20
Ϫ3
over 5 ϫ 10 cm
was attained while maintaining selective
epitaxy.
The surface after the TM process is assumed to be fresh based on
the desorption at higher temperature, therefore, the amount of boron
compound incorporation into the surface after TM can be increased.
On the other hand, competitive adsorption is dominant in conven-
tional growth methods. The intermittent injection of Si H and B H
2
6
2
6
that is formed by the TM process on Si͑100͒. The competitive ad-
sorption reduces the doping efficiency by over one order of magni-
tude compared with the growth in a high-efficiency mode. This com-
petitive adsorption phenomenon should be dominant for
conventional growth processes, for example, vapor phase epitaxy
and molecular beam epitaxy ͑MBE͒ using gas sources. In other
words, TM Si MLE with doping enables the control of the elemental
process steps of impurity incorporation and is advantageous for
achieving effective doping in the Si process.
Figure 5 shows the relationship between Hall mobility and the
carrier concentration of boron-doped p-type film for each mode of
doping. The mobility of the films grown in modes B-Si-TM and
B-TM-Si-TM showed higher values than those of the films grown in
other modes. In particular, the characteristics of the film grown in
mode B-TM-Si-TM showed the highest mobility, in addition to the
maximum doping efficiency, as shown in Fig. 4. In the region of
2
6
2
6
followed by the TM process in our method will be advantageous in
the future for achieving effective doping at low temperature.
The Semiconductor Research Institute of Semiconductor Research Foun-
dation assisted in meeting the publication costs of this article.
References
1
2
. J. Nishizawa, K. Aoki, S. Suzuki, and K. Kikuchi, J. Electrochem. Soc., 137, 1898
1990͒.
. J. Nishizawa, H. Abe, and T. Kurabayashi, J. Electrochem. Soc., 132, 1197 ͑1985͒.
͑
3. S. Imai, T. Iizuka, O. Sugiura, and M. Matsumura, Thin Solid Films, 225, 168
1993͒.
. D. Lubben, R. Tsu, T. R. Bramblett, and J. E. Greene, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 9,
003 ͑1991͒.
͑
4
5
3
. S. Imai, S. Takagi, O. Sugiura, and M. Matumura, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1, 30,
3646 ͑1991͒.