(
)
M. Barat et al.rChemical Physics Letters 306 1999 233–238
235
all fragments in the cluster centre of mass are deter-
spread F distribution corresponding to the grey
background in Fig. 1b for x-108.
Ž
.
mined Fig. 1 .
Ž .
Ž
.
The relative probabilities for the population of the
three pathways deduced from the counting rates of
the various fragments weighted by the detection
ii An electronic mechanism EM is responsible
for the backslash line in the ‘ZZ’ correlation of Fig.
1c. This mechanism also shows up as wiggles around
xf38, 0.5 eV-Erel -1 eV in Fig. 1a.
w x
efficiencies as discussed in Ref. 4 are given below
for a 263 eV centre-of-mass collision energy:
By an adequate filtering of the experimental data,
one finds that the relative contributions of the IM1,
IM2 and EM mechanisms to the Naq2 qNa pathways
can be estimated to 55%, 35 %, and 10 %, respec-
tively with an accuracy of ;5%. These values are
remarkably close to the theoretical predictions: 60–
68%, 23–31%, and 9%, respectively. The contour
maps of the two impulsive mechanisms are also well
reproduced by the theory, the A1 contribution in Ref.
Pathway A
Pathway B
Pathway C
Naq3 ™ Naq2 qNa
90% ,
4% ,
6% .
™ NaqqNa2
™ NaqqNaqNa
The relative Naq2 and Naq intensity is only de-
pendent on the relative ion detection efficiency and
is estimated with a 2% accuracy while the ratio
between B and C pathways that is dependent of the
absolute neutral detection efficiency is determined
with an accuracy not better than 20%.
It will be assumed in this Letter that all fragments
are in the electronic ground states, that is only the
less endothermal channel of each pathway is popu-
lated. The initial vibrational energy of the Naq3 ions,
unknown experimentally, was arbitrary set to 1 eV in
the theory as suggested in some previous work on
w x
Ž
.
7 . Notice in particular Fig. 1a the stretching of the
contours along the x axis for e-0.5 eV due to IM2.
The EM contribution, A2 in the theoretical analysis
w x
7 , is clearly peaked at xf08. The disagreement
with experiment cannot be considered as significant
due to inaccuracies arising in the data processing
around xf08.
w x
electron impact ionisation of sodium clusters 9 .
4. The NaH3 ™NaHHNaHNa and the NaH3 ™
NaHHNa2 pathways
3. The NaH3 ™NaH2 HNa pathway
Fig. 2a shows the correlation between x and e
the sum of the kinetic energies of the three fragments
in the cluster CM frame for the Naq3 ™ NaqqNaq
qNa pathway:
Fig. 1a shows the intensity contour diagrams as
functions of x and e. For large scattering angles, the
contour lines stretch along the curves given by a
model calculation assuming a binary He–Na elastic
Ž .
i
A first structure peaked at small x and e
Ž
.
collision considering a cold full curve or a hot,
values that accounts for ;40% of the population of
that channel is attributed to electronic transitions.
This mechanism should primarily correspond to the
C3 contribution of the theoretical analysis, a 3-body
breakup following an electronic transition towards
q
Ž
.
almost dissociated dashed curve Na3 ion, respec-
tively. Fig. 1b shows that for large x values, the
dissociation occurs around Ff08 as expected for a
Ž
.
direct impulsive mechanism IM1 in which a vio-
Ž
.
lent He–Na impact results in a direct ejection of a
the 2nd excited potential energy surface PES . How-
ever, the theory predicts too large an energy for e of
;1 eV. This is due to inaccuracy in the calculation
of the PES. Indeed a comparison with a full CI
calculation shows that the 3rd DIM PES is too
repulsive.
w x
fast Na fragment 2 .
A second structure shows up at x-108 and small
e values, the analysis of which has been given in
Ref. 4 . Actually, this structure corresponds to the
w x
sum of two mechanisms.
Ž .
Ž
.
Ž .
i A complex impulsive mechanism IM2 in-
volves an initial He–Na elastic collision followed by
momentum redistribution through Na–Na collisions.
In such a mechanism, the dissociation may occur out
ii The contour lines extend towards large e
values and roughly follow the curves of the binary
model indicating mechanisms that involve large mo-
mentum transfers. However, in contrast with the
previous case, the contours spread out over wider x
Ž
.
of the first He–Na collision plane giving a wide-