the amphiphilic species P123 tends to suppress the growth rate of
the other planes more than that of the {100} planes, leading to the
preferential growth rate, which is of essential importance for the
growth of 1D nano-materials. A similar special characteristic of
the surfactant was also observed for the chemical synthesis of gold
and silver nanoparticles using poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) as a
13
surface active additive by Xia.
We also investigated the relationship between the morphology
of tin and various experimental parameters including electro-
deposition time, the distance d between the two electrodes,
and current density. At 30 uC and a fixed current density of
2
2
3
.2 mA cm , we found that the morphologies of the tin nano-
rods at electrodeposition times of 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 min
were similar to each other but that uniformity decreased as the
deposition time increased. The electrodeposited tin was the same as
that obtained without P123 under similar conditions when the
distance d increased to 5 cm. When changing the current density,
various tin nano-rods with different dimensions could be obtained
Fig. 2 XRD patterns of tin samples electrodeposited from solutions with
P123 at 30 uC (a), 40 uC (b) and 50 uC (c), and without P123 at 30 uC (d).
about 140 nm. However, with the temperature increasing to 50 uC,
the tin nano-rods became thinner and more irregular with a
diameter of about 120 nm (Fig. 1c). For comparison purposes, we
also tried the deposition of tin at 30 uC from a similar electrolyte
but without surfactant P123. The electrodeposited tin film shows a
rough granular structure as shown in Fig. 1d, and no tin nano-rods
can be observed.
22
with current densities higher than 3.2 mA cm . These phenomena
could be explained by the influence of the electric field on the
orientation of the P123 micelles in the liquid phase and at the
14
surface of the electrode.
In brief, well ordered single crystal tin nano-rod arrays have
been prepared via electrodeposition by using P123 as a soft
Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns (inset in
Fig. 1) show that the tin nano-rods prepared with P123 at 30, 40
and 50 uC are in a single crystalline structure. The diffraction
pattern doesn’t change as the electron beam scans across individual
rods, suggesting that these tin nano-rods are single crystalline with
the same lattice structure. However, SAED patterns also show that
without P123 the electrodeposited tin is in polycrystalline structure,
further suggesting that the copolymer P123 plays a significant
role in the formation of the single-crystalline structure. The single
crystalline structure of tin nano-rods was further confirmed by
high-resolution TEM image (not shown here).
2
template. The precipitate of SnO and P123 are suggested to be
essential for the growth of the tin nano-rods. Due to the defined
morphology and crystal planes, tin nano-rods can be employed as
electrodes for various applications such as in the field of batteries
and field emission devices.
This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of
China (NSFC No.20333040).
Notes and references
1
D. H. Wang, W. L. L. Zhou, B. F. M. Canghy, J. E. Hampsey, X. L. Ji,
Y. B. Jiang, H. F. Xu, J. K. Tang, R. H. Schmehl, C. O. Connor,
C. J. Brinker and Y. F. Lu, Adv. Mater., 2003, 15, 130.
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the tin thin films
electrodeposited with P123 at temperatures of 30, 40 and 50 uC are
presented as curves a–c in Fig. 2, respectively. Curve d is the one
for the sample electrodeposited without P123 at a temperature of
2 Amy. L Prieto, Marisol Martin-Gonzalez, Jennifer Keyani,
Ronald Gronsky, Timothy Sands and Angelica M. Stacy, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 2388.
3
4
M. Lu, X. Hong and H. Li, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2002, 334, 291.
M. Wirtz, M. Parker, Y. Kobayashi and C. R. Martin, Chem. Eur. J.,
2002, 8, 3573.
30 uC. The peaks can be assigned to the diffraction from (200),
(101), (220), (211) and (112) crystal planes of tetragonal tin as
labelled on the curves. For curve b, using Bragg’s equation,
5 G. Yi and W. Schwarzacher, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1999, 74, 1746.
6
A. Govindaraj, B. C. Satishkumar, Manashi Nath and C. N. R. Rao,
Chem. Mater., 2000, 12, 202.
the lattice interplanar d-spacing constants for those planes are
˚
calculated as 2.90, 2.78, 2.08, 2.01, and 1.48 A respectively, which
7
J. Sloan, D. M. Wright, H. G. Woo, S. Bailey, G. Brown, A. P. E. York,
K. S. Coleman, J. L. Huchison and M. L. H. Green, Chem. Commun.,
1999, 699.
are in agreement with the report of Powder Diffraction Standards
˚
file No.01-0926. Furthermore, the value of 2.90 A agrees with the
8
9
G. S. Attard, P. N. Bartlette, N. R. B. Coleman, J. M. Elliott, J. R. Owen
and J. H. Wang, Science, 1997, 278, 838.
P. N. Bartlett and J. Marwan, Chem. Mater., 2003, 15, 2962.
fringe spacing measured from the HRTEM image. It is worth
noting that the intensity ratios between the (200) and (101) peaks,
and between the (200) and (112) diffraction peaks of the tin nano-
rods (2.12 and 6.17 for curve b, 2.87 and 8.18 for curve c,
respectively) are much higher than those for the corresponding
bulk materials (1.25 and 4.17 respectively, JCPD 01-0926). This
may suggest that the {100} planes are the most abundant planes of
the single crystalline tin nano-rod samples. It can be proposed that
10 A. H. Whitehead, J. M. Elliott and J. R. Owen, J. Power Sources, 1999,
81–82, 33.
1 C. Lizzul Rinne, J. Hren John and S. Fedkiw Peter, J. Electrochem.
1
Soc., 2002, 149, C150.
2 J. D. Donaldson and W. Moser, J. Chem. Soc., 1960, 4000.
1
13 Y. G. Sun and Y. N. Xia, Science, 2002, 298, 2176.
14 S. Liu, J. Yue and A. Gedanken, Adv. Mater., 2001, 13, 656.
4
942 | Chem. Commun., 2005, 4941–4942
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005