G892
Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 153 ͑10͒ G887-G893 ͑2006͒
cess for barrier layer ͑see Fig. 12 and 13͒ and its contact resistance
was significantly lower as compared with the integration schemes
with ALD-W film deposited by SiH reduction.
4
Figure 14 shows the effect of ALD-W film thickness on the
contact resistance. Here, TiCl -based CVD-TiN was used as a bar-
4
rier layer. From Fig. 14, it is clear that the contact resistance de-
creased as the thicknesses of ALD-W films decreased. This is due to
the decrease in cross-sectional area occupied by ALD-W film with a
higher resistivity ͑Fig. 2͒ and the increase of cross-sectional area
occupied by low-resistivity plug-fill CVD-W film ͑Fig. 10͒. The
minimum thickness of the nucleation layer evaluated as a nucleation
layer in this study was as thin as ϳ5 nm and the successful integra-
tion of this ultrathin nucleation layer indicates that ALD provides
uniform nucleation and accurate thickness control.
Figure 14. The distribution of contact resistances with different thicknesses
of ALD-W films at the contact chains A ͑AR ϳ15͒ connecting Al metal line
Conclusions
with W bit line. As a barrier layer, TiCl -based CVD-TiN film ͑closed sym-
4
bol͒ was used.
In summary a thin and conformal W nucleation layer is essential
for successfully filling the UHAR small plug as the device is ever-
shrinking. In this study, the properties of three kinds of ALD-W
films ͑two SiH -based ALD-W films and one B H -based ALD-W
4
2
6
clearly shows that the integration scheme with ALD-W ͑C͒ as a W
nucleation layer shows a much lower contact resistance than those
with ALD-W ͑A͒ or ALD-W ͑B͒. This is due to the much lower
resistivity of the total film stack consisting of W-plug, as shown by
Fig. 10, rather than the difference in the plug-filling capability.
Interestingly, when the MOCVD-TiN film was used as a barrier
layer, the integration scheme with ALD-W ͑A͒ showed higher
contact resistance and its distribution at 200 mm wafer became
poor. It is thought that the step coverage of the barrier layer, TiN,
film͒ were comparatively characterized and investigated as nucle-
ation layers for W-plug process of 70 nm design-rule DRAM.
Though all the ALD-W films had excellent step coverage irrespec-
tive of deposition processes, their resistivities were high, ranging
between ϳ125 and ϳ180 ⍀ cm with film thickness. High resis-
tivities of SiH -based ALD-W films are mainly due to the Si incor-
4
poration in the film and the formation of metastable -W phase with
high resistivity. The high resistivity of B H -based ALD-W film is
2
6
due to the B incorporation and the formation of amorphous phase.
The formation of amorphous W film as a nucleation layer for
W-plug process has many advantages such as superior diffusion bar-
rier properties, less-sensitive thickness effect of film resistivity, and
the large-size grains formation growing on it, leading to lowering
the resistivity of the W-plug stack. The results demonstrated that the
integration scheme with B H -based ALD-W film showed a much
was degraded with MOCVD as compared to TiCl -based CVD. This
4
is possibly due to the fact that generally, the deposition for
MOCVD-TiN is performed in the diffusion-controlled regime to ob-
tain high-quality film. That the precursor is too bulky for MOCVD
to transport into the bottom of UHAR contact could be another
reason for poor step coverage. When the step coverage of TiN is not
sufficient at UHAR contact, the growth of ALD-W film is more
2
6
lower contact resistance at UHAR contact. The B H -based process
2
6
likely to occur on the interlayer dielectric material, SiO , and not
also has advantages in terms of nucleation on SiO . The enhanced
2
2
TiN, especially at the bottom of the contact. Meanwhile, it is known
that nucleation and growth of ALD-W film deposited using alternat-
nucleation on SiO by B H -based process provides a stable and low
2
2
6
contact resistance with MOCVD-TiN as the barrier layer with lim-
ited step coverage. By the same argument, the B H pretreatment
11,21
ing exposures of WF and SiH or Si H on SiO is difficult
and
6
4
2
6
2
2
6
this causes the degradation in step coverage of W nucleation layer
even though W is deposited by ALD. The degradation in the step
coverage of the nucleation layer again degrades W-plug filling, re-
sulting in the increase in contact resistance. It was recently reported
that the B H pretreatment enhanced the nucleation and growth of
prior to ALD-W formation using SiH reduction contributed to the
enhancement of the nucleation and assured stable and low contact
resistance at the UHAR contact in this study.
4
Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., assisted in meeting the publication costs of
this article.
2
6
11
ALD-W film on SiO surface. This could enhance the step cover-
2
age of ALD-W nucleation layer deposited by SiH reduction of WF
References
4
6
even though the step coverage of the underlayer, TiN, was not sat-
isfactory. In this study, the contact resistance with ALD-W ͑B͒
nucleation layer kept lower values, except for some positions of the
wafer when the MOCVD-TiN was used. This suggests that B H
1
. H. Kim, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 21, 2231 ͑2003͒.
2. M. Leskelä and M. Ritala, Thin Solid Films, 409, 138 ͑2002͒.
3
4
. http://www.itrs.net/Links/2005ITRS/Interconnect2005.pdf
. J. E. J. Schmitz, Chemical Vapor Deposition of Tungsten and Tungsten Silicides,
Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ ͑1991͒.
2
6
pretreatment provides some flexibility in terms of choosing the
method for depositing TiN underlayer for W-plug process. In terms
of W nucleation on SiO , B H reduction of WF could provide the
5
6
7
. T. Omstead, G. C. D’Couto, S.-H. Lee, P. Wongsenkaum, J. Collins, and K. Levy,
Solid State Technol., 51, 45 ͑2002͒.
. S.-H. Kim, E.-S. Hwang, S.-H. Pyi, H.-J. Sun, J.-W. Lee, J.-K. Kim, N. Kawk, H.
2
2
6
6
Sohn, and J. Kim, J. Electrochem. Soc., 152, C408 ͑2005͒.
most effective passway and this assured stable and low contact re-
sistance even when the MOCVD-TiN was used as the barrier layer.
Figure 13 shows the contact resistance distribution when the as-
pect ratio was further increased to ϳ17 ͓contact chain B͔. All the
integration schemes show stable and low contact resistances with
. J. W. Klaus, S. J. Ferro, and S. M. George, Thin Solid Films, 360, 145 ͑2000͒.
8. M. Yang, H. Chung, A. Yoon, H. Fang, A. Zhang, C. Knepfler, R. Jackson, J. S.
Byun, A. Mak, M. Eizenberg, M. Xi, M. Kori, and A. K. Sinha, in Conference
Proceedings ULSI XVII, p. 655, MRS, Warrendale, PA ͑2002͒.
9
. S.-H. Lee, L. Gonzalez, Josh Collins, K. Ashitani, and K. Levy, in Conference
Proceedings ULSI XVII, p. 649, MRS, Warrendale, PA ͑2002͒.
TiCl -based CVD-TiN, which is similar to Fig. 12. Even though
10. Y. Mizoguchi, K. Suzuki, M. Tachibana, and D. Abe, in Conference Proceedings
ULSI XVIII, p. 451, MRS, Warrendale, PA ͑2003͒.
1. S.-H. Kim, E.-S. Hwang, B.-M. Kim, J.-W. Lee, H.-J. Sun, T. E. Hong, J.-K. Kim,
H. Sohn, J. Kim, and T.-S. Yoon, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 8, C155 ͑2005͒.
2. S. B. Herner, S. A. Desai, A. Nak, and S. G. Ghanayem, Electrochem. Solid-State
Lett., 2, 398 ͑1999͒.
3. S. M. Rossnagel, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 20, 2328 ͑2002͒.
4. A. K. Sinha, Prog. Mater. Sci., 15, 92 ͑1972͒.
5. Y. G. Shen, Y. W. Mai, Q. C. Zhang, D. R. Mckenzie, W. D. McFall, and W. E.
McBride, J. Appl. Phys., 87, 117 ͑2000͒.
4
B H pretreatment was done prior to ALD-W deposition ͓ALD-W
2
6
1
͑
B͔͒, the distribution of contact resistance was degraded with
MOCVD-TiN barrier layer and its values were higher at all the
1
positions of 200 mm wafer than those with TiCl -based CVD-TiN.
4
1
1
1
The contact resistance of the integration scheme with ALD-W ͑A͒
further increased and its distribution worsened with MOCVD-TiN.
However, with ALD-W ͑C͒ deposited by B H reduction, we could
2
6
obtain a stable contact resistance irrespective of the deposition pro-
16. P. M. Petroff, A. K. Sinha, T. T. Sheng, H. J. Levinstein, and F. B. Alexander, J.