COMMUNICATIONS
[1] A. Ecker, E. Weckert, H. Schnöckel, Nature 1997, 387, 379; W. Köstler,
G. Linti, Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 2758; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
1997, 36, 2644; A. Schnepf, G. Stöûer, R. Köppe, H. Schnöckel, Angew.
Chem. 2000, 112, 1709; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1637; A.
Schnepf, G. Stöûer, H. Schnöckel, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2000, 626,
1676.
[2] B. E. Eichler, N. J. Hardman, P. P. Power, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112,
391; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 383; N. Wiberg, T. Blank, H.
Nöth, W. Ponikwar, Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 887; Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 1999, 38, 839; G. Linti, A. Rodig, Chem. Commun. 2000, 127.
[3] S. T. Haubrich, P. P. Power, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 2202. Review
about tetrahedral cluster compounds: W. Uhl, Rev. Inorg. Chem. 1998,
18, 239.
Stereoselective Multiple Functionalization of
Pyrylium Salts by Domino Reactions with
2-Silyloxybuta-1,3-dienes**
Uwe Beifuss,* Kim Goldenstein, Frank Döring,
Christopher Lehmann, and Mathias Noltemeyer
The development of multicomponent domino reactions is
particularly attractive as these allow the stereoselective
conversion of several simple substrates into complex target
molecules, such as annulated or bridged polycycles, in a single
step.[1] Pyrylium salts are easily accessible, reactive hetero-
arenes that react preferably with nucleophiles. Apart from
transformations that proceed with conservation of the pyran
ring, we are also familiar with reactions in which the primary
adducts are stabilized by ring opening or subsequent ring
transformation.[2] In contrast, only a few stereoselective
reactions that start from pyrylium salts are known to result
in complex ring systems. One exception is the 1,3-dipolar
cycloadditions of 3-oxidopyrylium salts, which have initially
been developed by Sammes et al. and later by Wender,
[4] O. T. Beachley, Jr., M. J. Noble, R. D. Allendoerfer, J. Organomet.
Chem. 1999, 582, 32.
[5] R. A. Kovar, H. Derr, D. Brandau, J. O. Callaway, Inorg. Chem. 1975,
14, 2809.
[6] Crystal structure of 1: Crystals from toluene at 308C; C36H81Ga9 ´
0.33C7H8, orthorhombic, space group Pnnm; a 1900.73(5), b
2181.55(4), c 3751.45(7) pm, V 15555.5(6) 3, Z 12, 1calcd
1.498 gcm 3, crystal dimensions: 0.50 Â 0.45 Â 0.36 mm, diffractome-
ter Stoe IPDS, MoKa radiation, 193 K, measurement range: 3.9 <
2V< 52.08, 335 exposures, Df 0.68, 15480 independent reflections,
11165 reflections F > 4s(F), m 4.62 mm 1, numerical absorption
correction; programs SHELXTL PLUS REL 4.1 and SHELXL-97,
746 parameters, R1 0.045 and wR2 (all data) 0.127, max./min.
Ä
Mascarenas, and Magnus and co-workers to provide an
3
residual electron density: 2.77/ 3.02 Â 1030 em
. Compound 1
attractive route to various ring systems and natural products.[3]
One concept that may be applied to yield products of a
higher complexity in diastereomerically pure form from
simple components is the multiple functionalization of
positively charged heteroarenes. Here, A first reacts regiose-
lectively with a nucleophile at C-2. The resulting enol ether B
can then react with an electrophile at C-3 forming the Michael
acceptor C. Subsequent transformation with a nucleophile at
C-6 and an electrophile at C-5 yield the trisubstituted D and
the tetrasubstituted heterocycle E, respectively (Scheme 1).
Following research on the selective mono- and bisfunctional-
crystallizes with 1.5 independent molecules per asymmetric unit, one
molecule is located on a crystallographic mirror plane. The toluene
molecules are strongly disordered, their hydrogen atoms were not
considered. Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for the
structure reported in this paper have been deposited with the
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary publica-
tion no. CCDC-150591 (1). Copies of the data can be obtained free of
charge on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge
CB21EZ, UK (fax: (44)1223-336-033; e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.
ac.uk).
[7] W. Uhl, M. Layh, T. Hildenbrand, J. Organomet. Chem. 1989, 364, 289;
X. He, R. A. Bartlett, M. M. Olmstead, K. Ruhlandt-Senge, B. E.
Sturgeon, P. P. Power, Angew. Chem. 1993, 105, 761; Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 717.
[8] W. Uhl, W. Hiller, M. Layh, W. Schwarz, Angew. Chem. 1992, 104,
1378; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1992, 31, 1364; W. Uhl, A.
Jantschak, J. Organomet. Chem. 1998, 555, 263.
[9] Cyclic voltammogram of 1 in CH2Cl2/0.1m Bu4NPF6 or 1,2-difluoro-
benzene/0.1m Bu4NPF6 at 298 K: Reversible reduction at E(1/2)
1.74 V (vs. [Fe(C5H5)2] /[Fe(C5H5)2]0); irreversible two-electron
reduction at 2.70 V; irreversible multielectron oxidation at 0.40 V
(100 mVs 1). ESR spectrum of 2, generated electrochemically in
CH2Cl2/0.1m Bu4NPF6 at 298 K, measured in a glassy frozen solution
at 3.4 K: g1 2.173, g2 2.06, g3 1.95. Owing to very fast relaxation
no signal was observed above 110 K.
[10] [B6X6] (X halogen): V. Lorenzen, W. Preetz, F. Baumann, W. Kaim,
Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 4011.
[11] Structural parameters of the model compounds 1a and 2a were
optimized at the HF/6-31G* level with the program package
Gaussian 98. This level has previously been shown to be reliable for
gallium compounds. Ga9Me9 (1a): Ranges of Ga Ga distances:
255.1 ± 257.6 pm to the capping Ga atoms (av 256.3 pm), 266.6 ±
268.4 pm for the edges of the triangles of the prism (av 267.3 pm),
294.7 ± 303.1 pm for the edges of the prism parallel to the threefold
rotation axis (av 298.2 pm); Ga C 197.7 pm (av). [Ga9Me9] 2a:
Ranges of Ga Ga distances: 253.8 ± 255.1 pm to the capping Ga atoms
(av 254.4 pm), 274.7 ± 275.5 pm for the edges of the triangles of the
prism (av 275.1 pm), 280.8 ± 282.7 pm for the edges of the prism
parallel to the threefold rotation axis (av 281.6 pm); Ga C 200.3 pm.
[12] L. M. McKee, Z.-X. Wang, P. von R. Schleyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 4781; H. Binder, R. Kellner, K. Vaas, M. Hein, F. Baumann, M.
Wanner, R. Winter, W. Kaim, W. Hönle, Y. Grin, U. Wedig, M.
Schultheiss, R. K. Kremer, H. G. von Schnering, O. Groeger, G.
Engelhardt, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1999, 625, 1059.
Scheme 1. Multiple functionalization of positively charged heteroarenes.
[*] Priv.-Doz. Dr. U. Beifuss, Dr. K. Goldenstein, Dipl.-Chem. F. Döring
Institut für Organische Chemie der Georg-August-Universität Göt-
tingen
Tammannstrasse 2, 37077 Göttingen (Germany)
Fax : (49)551-39-9660
Dipl.-Chem. C. Lehmann, Dr. M. Noltemeyer
Institut für Anorganische Chemie der Georg-August-Universität
Göttingen
Tammannstrasse 4, 37077 Göttingen (Germany)
[**] This work was supported by the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie.
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under
568
ꢀ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69451 Weinheim, 2001
1433-7851/01/4003-0568 $ 17.50+.50/0
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, No. 3