exhibit a shape like that reported in Fig. 3͑b͒. A triangular
growing front, 20 nm thick, and oriented on the ͑311͒ direc-
tion, is clearly visible on one side of the pyramidal island.
This observation fits nicely within the growth cycle model
recently proposed,16 which the relaxation of the strain in the
islands occurs by the insertion of dislocations that nucleate at
the edge of the islands themselves, becoming a preferential
site for the attachment of Ge. In particular, every time a
dislocation is created, the island grows by ϳ20 nm in the
direction of the strain relief. We conclude, therefore, that the
growing fronts we have observed are originated by the inser-
tion of dislocations. Moreover, the growth of the front occurs
in a ledge-by-ledge mode from the base upwards in order to
minimize the interaction between the surface steps.15 After
the insertion of a certain number of dislocations, the typical
shape of the islands becomes the truncated pyramid reported
in Fig. 3͑a͒ with ͕311͖ lateral facets and a ͑100͒ top facet.
The appearance of the ͑100͒ top facet confirms the insertion
of dislocations.17 We point out that the critical height at
which the morphological transition occurs is in good agree-
ment with the critical value of 50 nm for the maximum
height of dislocation free SK islands found by Eaglesham
and Cerullo.14 Under these conditions, the subsequent lateral
increase of the islands is much faster than the vertical one, so
that h remains nearly constant. Moreover, the lateral facets
orientation remains ͕311͖.
In conclusion, we have analyzed the evolution of the SK
Ge islanding on Si͑100͒. We demonstrated that two morphol-
ogy transitions occurred upon increasing the base width of
the islands. The first transition marks the evolution from
few-monolayer-thick terraces to square-base pyramidal is-
lands. In the second transition the island shape changes from
square-base pyramids to tetragonal truncated pyramids. Both
transitions are brought about by the need for the system to
minimize the elastic energy.
FIG. 3. ͑a͒ View of a typical island with the shape of tetragonal truncated
pyramid with rectangular base ͑hϭ60 nm and bϭ320 nm͒. ͑b͒ View of a
square-base pyramidal island ͑hϭ55 nm and bϭ300 nm͒ on which a dislo-
cation has been just inserted, forming a new growing ledge. The vertical
magnification, shading and azimuth are the same for both images. The scan
direction is aligned in the ͓011͔ sample direction.
as the islands grow, they become triangular in cross section.
Following their model, we find that, in our case, the critical
width for the development of pyramidal islands is bc
ϳ40 nm.
1 F. Capasso and S. Datta, Phys. Today, 74 ͑1990͒.
2 T. Takahagara and K. Takeda, Phys. Rev. B 46, 15 578 ͑1992͒.
3 J. R. Heath, J. J. Shiang, and A. P. Alivisatos, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 1607
͑1994͒.
For bϾbc , the islands increase in size without varying
their shape, keeping fixed the aspect ratio at h/bϳ0.25. This
is illustrated in Figs. 2͑b͒–2͑d͒ where a linear relationship
between h and b is evident for values of b in the range
70–300 nm. Furthermore, the island distribution is quite nar-
row with ⌬b/bmeanϳ0.3, where ⌬b is the standard deviation
of the Gaussian distribution of the base widths and bmean
their mean value. These data show unambiguously that the
island growth proceeds in the ledge-by-ledge mode as re-
cently suggested.15
The increase of the island width beyond ϳ300 nm brings
about a variation in the shape and a change of the growth
mode. Referring to Figs. 2͑c͒ and 2͑d͒, we see that the island
height tends to a limiting value hcϳ55 nm. The island
shape becomes that of truncated pyramids with rectangular
base, as shown in Fig. 3͑a͒. Concomitantly, there is an in-
crease in the width of their size distribution, becoming
⌬b/bmeanϳ0.5. Thus, a second morphology transition occurs
at bϳ300 nm. We believe that this lateral growth is origi-
nated by the insertion of dislocations in order to relax the
stress accumulated in the islands. Indeed, we have observed
that at the beginning of the lateral growth, i.e., when h and b
are close to the values at the transition point, the islands
4 J. Brunner, T. S. Rupp, H. Gossner, R. Ritter, I. Eisele, and G. Abstreiter,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 994 ͑1994͒.
5 N. Usami, T. Mine, S. Fukatsu, and Y. Shiraki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 1126
͑1994͒.
6 H. Sunamura, N. Usami, S. Fukatsu, and Y. Shiraki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66,
3025 ͑1995͒.
7
¨
R. Apetz, L. Vescan, A. Hartmann, C. Dieker, and H. Luth, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 66, 445 ͑1995͒.
8 E. Palange, G. Capellini, L. Di Gaspare, and F. Evangelisti, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 68, 2982 ͑1996͒.
9 The tip sidewall angle of 80° ensures that convolution problems could be
important only for structures having growing angles у70°.
10 J. Tersoff and R. M. Tromp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2782 ͑1993͒.
11 C. Priester and M. Lannoo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 93 ͑1995͒.
12
´
A. L. Barabasi ͑unpublished͒.
13 D. J. Eaglesham, F. C. Unterwald, and D. C. Jacobson, Phys. Rev. Lett.
70, 966 ͑1993͒.
14 D. J. Eaglesham and M. Cerullo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1943 ͑1990͒.
15 D. E. Jesson, K. M. Chen, and S. J. Pennycook, Mater. Res. Bull. 21, 31
͑1996͒.
16 F. K. Le Goues, M. C. Reuter, J. Tersoff, M. Hammar, and R. M. Tromp,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 300 ͑1994͒; M. Hammar, F. K. Le Goues, J. Tersoff,
M. C. Reuter, and R. M. Tromp, Surf. Sci. 349, 129 ͑1996͒.
17 M. A. Lutz, R. M. Feenstra, P. M. Mooney, J. Tersoff, and J. O. Chu, Surf.
Sci. 316, L1075 ͑1994͒.
Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 70, No. 4, 27 January 1997 Capellini et al. 495
On: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 16:45:18