554
SHMACHKOVA, KOTSARENKO
3. Yamaguchi, T., Jin, T., Ishida, T., and Tanabe, K., Mater.
Chem. Phys., 1987, vol. 17, p. 3.
tion of sulfated zirconium oxide can be represented as
described below. On the treatment of zirconium oxide
with a sulfuric acid solution, the components react to
form various sulfates. Based on the catalytic behavior
and thermal stability, it is believed that at least normal
and acidic sulfates are formed. Because acid sulfates
are less thermally stable compounds, they undergo deg-
radation as the temperature of calcination is increased.
This is evident from a decrease in the concentration of
sulfate sulfur and in the activity with calcination tem-
perature (see Table 1). The behavior in the isomeriza-
tion reaction (Figs. 1, 2) suggests that the surface com-
position remained almost unchanged at the concentrations
of sulfate anions higher than 0.5–0.7 mmol SO3/(g Cat). A
further increase in the amount of supported sulfuric
acid results in either an increase in the thickness of a
surface sulfate layer or the formation of dispersed zir-
conium sulfates rather than changes the surface compo-
sition. The ratio between surface and bulk sulfates also
depends on the nature of the parent oxide. Because of a
higher reactivity of the hydroxide, the concentration of
bulk sulfates is higher in this series of catalysts, as fol-
lows from their lower specific activities.
The results demonstrated that the specific activity of
catalysts based on zirconium oxide in the model reac-
tions is higher than the activity of hydroxide-based cat-
alysts. Although the strengths of proton and aprotic
sites in the catalysts of both series are similar, their
behaviors in the reaction of n-butane skeletal isomer-
ization were different; catalysts based on zirconium
hydroxide are much more active [14, 20]. Thus, it fol-
lows that skeletal isomerization takes place at more
complex centers than single proton or paired (aprotic–
basic) sites at which the model reactions occur.
4. Song, X. and Sayari, A., Catal. Rev.–Sci. Eng., 1996,
vol. 38, p. 329.
5. Corma, A., Chem. Rev., 1995, vol. 95, no. 3, p. 597.
6. Morterra, C., Cerrato, G., Pinna, F., Signoretto, M., and
Strukul, G., J. Catal., 1994, vol. 149, p. 181.
7. Spielbauer, D., Mekher, G.A., Zaki, M.I., and Knoz-
inger, H., Catal. Lett., 1996, vol. 40, p. 71.
8. Shmachkova, V.P., Kotsarenko, N.S., and Paukshtis, E.A.,
React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 2000, vol. 71, p. 385.
9. Paukshtis, E.A., Infrakrasnaya spektroskopiya v getero-
gennom kislotno-osnovnom katalize (Infrared Spectros-
copy in Heterogeneous Acid–Base Catalysis), Novosi-
birsk: Nauka, 1992.
10. Malysheva, L.V., Kotsarenko, N.S., and Paukshtis, E.A.,
Kinet. Katal., 1990, vol. 31, no. 1, p. 247.
11. Karakchiev, L.G., Kotsarenko, N.S., Dzis’ko, V.A., and
Gorshkova, T.P., Kinet. Katal., 1968, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 282.
12. Shmachkova, V.P., Kotsarenko, N.S., Malysheva, L.V.,
and Paukshtis, E.A., Kinet. Katal., 1990, vol. 31,
p. 1021.
13. Malysheva, L.V., Shmachkova, V.P., Kotsarenko, N.S.,
and Paukshtis, E.A., Kinet. Katal., 1991, vol. 32, no. 4,
p. 940.
14. Chen, F.R., Coudurier, G., Joly, J.-F., and Vedrine, J.C.,
J. Catal., 1993, vol. 143, p. 616.
15. Kotsarenko, N.S. and Malysheva, L.V., Kinet. Katal.,
1983, vol. 24, no. 4, p. 877.
16. Kotsarenko, N.S., Shmachkova, V.P., and Mastikhin, V.M.,
Kinet. Katal., 1998, vol. 39, no. 4, p. 575.
17. Shmachkova, V.P. and Kotsarenko, N.S., Kinet. Katal.
(in press).
18. Shmachkova, V.P., Cand. Sci. (Chem.) Dissertation,
Novosibirsk, 1994.
19. Olindo, R., Pinna, F., Strukul, G., Canton, P., Cerrato, G.,
Meligrana, G., and Morterra, C., Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal.,
2000, vol. 130, p. 2375.
REFERENCES
1. Arata, K., Adv. Catal., 1990, vol. 37, p. 165.
2. Jin, T., Yamaguchi, T., and Tanabe, K., J. Phys. Chem., 20. Shmachkova, V.P., Kotsarenko, N.S., and Paukshtis, E.A.,
1986, vol. 90, p. 4797.
Cat. Lett. (in press).
KINETICS AND CATALYSIS Vol. 43 No. 4 2002