RSC Advances
Paper
the solution increased with the increasing of reaction time. Aer 12 L. Zhou, W. Song, Z. Chen and G. Yin, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
20 min, the value was up to 0.25 mg Lꢀ1, suggesting that the
2013, 47, 3833.
leaching of cobalt species from the catalyst is much easier in 13 J. Wu, H. Zhang and J. Qiu, J. Hazard. Mater., 2012, 215, 138.
comparison with the CoxOy-N/GAC catalyst. In our previous works, 14 J. H. Ramirez, C. A. Costa, L. M. Madeira, G. Mata,
it has been shown that AO7 can be nearly complete decolorized in
10 min with 0.295 mg Lꢀ1 Co2+ in bicarbonate aqueous solution,
M. A. Vicente, M. L. Rojas-Cervantes, A. J. Lopez-Peinado
and R. M. Martin-Aranda, Appl. Catal., B, 2007, 71, 44.
and the efficiency of the CoxOy/GAC catalyst could be mainly 15 W. Huang, M. Brigante, F. Wu, C. Mousty, K. Hanna and
attributed to the homogeneous reaction. Indeed, when the solid G. Mailhot, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, 47, 1952.
catalyst was separated aer 2.5 min of reaction, the further 16 A. N. Pham, G. W. Xing, C. J. Miller and T. D. Waite, J. Catal.,
decolorization of AO7 was still observed. From XPS result it could 2013, 301, 54.
be found that there was nearly no nitrogen species in the CoxOy/ 17 O. P. Taran, A. B. Ayusheev, O. L. Ogorodnikova,
GAC catalyst surface. Thus the high stability of cobalt species in
CoxOy-N/GAC catalyst might come from the interaction between
cobalt and nitrogen, as described in Fig. 3.
I. P. Prosvirin, L. A. Isupova and V. N. Parmon, Appl.
Catal., B, 2015, 180, 86.
18 A. Xu, X. Li, S. Ye, G. Yin and Q. Zeng, Appl. Catal., B, 2011,
102, 37.
19 X. Li, Z. Xiong, X. Ruan, D. Xia, Q. Zeng and A. Xu, Appl.
Catal., A, 2012, 411–412, 24.
4. Conclusions
In summary, CoxOy-N/GAC is an efficient heterogeneous 20 Z. Yang, H. Wang, M. Chen, M. Luo, D. Xia, A. Xu and
Fenton-like catalyst that is capable of oxidizing highly stable Q. Zeng, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2012, 51, 11104.
organic dye AO7 with the breaking of azo bonds and opening of 21 X. Long, Z. Yang, H. Wang, M. Chen, K. Peng, Q. Zeng and
naphthaquinone under mild reaction conditions. The HOc A. Xu, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2012, 51, 11998.
radicals and O2ꢀc ions were produced as the main reactive 22 M. Luo, L. Lv, G. Deng, W. Yao, Y. Ruan, X. Li and A. Xu, Appl.
species. The catalyst has a great stability against cobalt leach- Catal., A, 2014, 469, 198.
ing, due to the strong interaction between nitrogen and cobalt. 23 X. Li, W. Shi, Q. Cheng, L. Huang, M. Wei, L. Cheng, Q. Zeng
Though the reusability of CoxOy-N/GAC is not very good, its and A. Xu, Appl. Catal., A, 2014, 475, 297.
activity can be fully recovered aer heat treatment under N2 24 W. Shi, Q. Cheng, L. Duan, Y. Ding, Z. Xiong, X. Li and A. Xu,
atmosphere. However, the detailed mechanisms are still not
well understood and should be studied in future work.
New J. Chem., 2014, 38, 4038.
25 A. Jawad, X. Lu, Z. Chen and G. Yin, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2014,
118, 10028.
26 A. A. Deshmukh, R. U. Islam, M. J. Witcomb, W. A. L. van
Otterlo and N. J. Coville, ChemCatChem, 2010, 2, 51.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science 27 C. B. Putta and S. Ghosh, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2011, 353, 1889.
Foundation of China (Grant No. 21207105).
28 H. Xiong, M. Moyo, M. K. Rayner, L. L. Jewell, D. G. Billing
and N. J. Coville, ChemCatChem, 2010, 2, 514.
29 R. V. Jagadeesh, H. Junge, M.-M. Pohl, J. Radnik, A. Bruckner
and M. Beller, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 10776.
References
1 C. Pearce, J. Lloyd and J. Guthrie, Dyes Pigm., 2003, 58, 179. 30 D. Banerjee, R. V. Jagadeesh, K. Junge, M.-M. Pohl, J. Radnik,
2 M. Zhu, L. Lee, H. Wang and Z. Wang, J. Hazard. Mater.,
2007, 149, 735.
3 E. Neyens and J. Baeyens, J. Hazard. Mater., 2003, 98, 33.
A. Buckner and M. Beller, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 4359.
31 T. Stemmler, F. A. Westerhaus, A.-E. Surkus, M.-M. Pohl,
K. Junge and M. Beller, Green Chem., 2014, 16, 4535.
´
4 B. Merzouk, B. Gourich, A. Sekki, K. Madani, C. Vial and 32 J. Casanovas, J. M. Ricart, J. Rubio, E. Illas and J. M. Jimenez-
M. Barkaoui, Chem. Eng. J., 2009, 149, 207.
Mateos, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 8071.
5 K. Kumar, S. S. Devi, K. Krishnamurthi, S. Gampawar, 33 J. R. Pels, F. Kapteijn, J. A. Moulijn, Q. Zhu and
N. Mishra, G. H. Pandya and T. Chakrabarti, Bioresour.
Technol., 2006, 97, 407.
K. M. Thomas, Carbon, 1995, 33, 1641.
¨
34 W. Grunert, R. Feldhaus, K. Anders, S. E. Shipiro,
6 S. Kouraichi, M. E. Samar, M. Abbessi, H. Boudouh and
A. Balaska, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2015, 5, 1052.
G. V. Antoshin and K. M. Minachev, J. Electron Spectrosc.
Relat. Phenom., 1986, 40, 187.
7 X. Yang, X. Xu, J. Xu and Y. Han, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 35 Y. Su, Y. Zhu, H. Jiang, J. Shen, X. Yang, W. Zou, J. Chen and
16058. C. Li, Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 15080.
8 J. Gong, J. Liu, X. Chen, Z. Jiang, X. Wen, E. Mijowska and 36 S. Rismayani, M. Fukushima, H. Ichikawa and K. Tatsumi, J.
T. Tang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 7461.
Hazard. Mater., 2004, 114, 175.
9 Y. Tao, Q. Ni, M. Wei, D. Xia, X. Li and A. Xu, RSC Adv., 2015, 37 D. Mendez-Paz, F. Omil and J. M. Lema, Enzyme Microb.
5, 44128. Technol., 2005, 36, 264.
10 X. Li, L. Yang, C. Qin, F. Liu, L. Zhao, K. Shao and Z. Su, RSC 38 A. Xu, X. Li, H. Xiong and G. Yin, Chemosphere, 2011, 82,
Adv., 2015, 5, 59093. 1190.
11 S. Navalon, R. Martin, M. Alvaro and H. Garcia, Angew. 39 H. J. Forman and I. Fridovich, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 1973,
Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 8403.
168, 396.
84310 | RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 84303–84310
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015