Influence of Synthesis Methods
J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 109, No. 48, 2005 22739
and Lewis acid sites but also the strongest acidity. Because the
dispersion of WOx species in the WZH solid was very high
and uniform, it is reasonable to conclude that highly dispersed
WOx species are mainly responsible for the generation of acidity.
As discussed above, the crystalline structure of the zirconia
phase in WZH sample shows the strongest deformation that
resulted from the strongest interaction between the WOx species
and zirconia, due to the highest dispersion of WOx species,
therefore, the deformation of the crystalline structure is also
correlated well with acidity of the solid.
The catalytic activity showed the same trend as that observed
in the population of Bro¨nsted and Lewis acid sites. The relatively
highest conversion of n-hexane was achieved on the sample
with the highest surface tungsten density. WOx species homo-
geneously distributed on the surface of the tetragonal ZrO2 are
the active species that participate in the reaction, and that well
crystallized WO3 phase with large particles size are less active
for the n-hexane isomerization reaction.
Acknowledgment. The financial support from the IMP-
D00237 Project is greatly appreciated. We thank Mrs. Rosa Isela
Conde Velazco and Mr. Gabriel Pineda Vela´zquez for their
technical assistance.
References and Notes
(1) Barton, D. G.; Shtein, M.; Wilson, R. D.; Soled, S. L.; Iglesia, E.
J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 630.
(2) Iglesia, E.; Soled, S. L.; Kramer, J. Catal. 1993, 144, 238.
(3) Pe´rez, M.; Armendariz, H.; Toledo, J. A.; Va´zquez, A.; Navarrete,
J.; Montoya, A.; Ga´rcia, A. J. Mol Catal., A 1999, 149, 69.
(4) Lo´pez-Salinas, E.; Herna´ndez-Corte´z, J. G.; Corte´s, M. A.;
Navarrete, J.; Llanos, M. E.; Va´zquez, A.; Armenda´riz, H.; Lo´pez, T. Appl.
Catal. A 1998, 175, 43.
(5) Hino, M.; Arata, K.; J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1987, 1259.
(6) Iglesia, E.; Barton, D. G.; Soled, S. L.; Miseo, S.; Baumgartner, J.
E.; Gates, W. E.; Fuentes, G. A.; Meitzner, G. D. Surf. Sci. Catal. 1996,
101, 533.
(7) Barton, D. G.; Soled, S. L.; Meitzner, G. D.; Fuentes, G. A.; Iglesia,
E. J. Catal. 1999, 181, 57.
(8) Scheithauer, M.; Grasselli, R.; Kno¨zinger, K. Langmuir 1998, 14,
3019.
(9) Armenda´riz, H.; Corte´s-Ja´come, M. A.; Herna´ndez, I.; Navarrete,
J.; Va´zquez, A. J. Mater. Chem. 2003, 13, 143.
5. Conclusions
Binary WO3-ZrO2 solids with different phase compositions
and structural distortion were synthesized by use of the
coprecipitation method under a variety of aging conditions. The
solids aged at room temperature or refluxed at 373 K for 24 h
showed an amorphous phase, which may segregate nanocrystals
of WO3 with a size larger than 5 nm from the phase of tetragonal
zirconia after 1073 K of calcination. However, when the sample
was hydrothermally treated in an autoclave, well-crystallized
phases of tetragonal and monoclinic zirconia were formed in
the dried material, and even when it was calcined at 1073 K,
not any WO3 nanocrystals larger than 3 nm were segregated,
indicating a very high dispersion of tungsten species. All the
materials showed mesoporous textures with surface area between
48 and 66 m2/g and average pore diameter between 5 and 10
nm.
The crystalline structure of tetragonal zirconia in the solid
obtained in hydrothermal conditions was strongly deformed, as
indicated by clear expansion of the lattice c parameter and Zr-O
bond lengths (d2) and variations in bond angles (φ and δ) that
resulted from the strong interaction between WOx and ZrO2.
However, the structure of zirconia in the materials obtained by
aging the precipitate at room temperature and refluxing at 373
K showed only slight distortion, which resulted from weak
interaction between WOx and ZrO2 because of segregation of
large WO3 crystals.
(10) Boyse, R. A.; Ko, E. I. J. Catal. 1997, 171, 191.
(11) Gazzoli, D.; Valigi, M.; Dragone, R.; Marucci, A.; Mattei, G. J.
Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 431.
(12) Santiesteban, J. G.; Vartuli, J. C.; Han, S.; Bastian, R. D.; Chang,
C. D. J. Catal. 1997, 168, 431.
(13) Loridant, S.; Feche, C.; Essayem, N.; Figueras, F. J. Phys. Chem.
B 2005, 109, 5631.
(14) Hino, M.; Arata, K. Proc. 9th Int. Congr. Catal. 1988, 1727.
(15) Bokhimi, X.; Morales, A.; Garc´ıa, A.; Xiao, T. D.; Chen, H.; Strutt,
P. R. J. Solid State Chem. 1999, 142, 409.
(16) Corte´s-Ja´come, M. A.; Toledo, J. A.; Armenda´riz, H.; Hernandez,
I.; Bokhimi, X. J. Solid State Chem. 2002, 164, 339.
(17) Chuah, G. H. Catal. Today 1999, 49, 131.
(18) Vaudagna, S. R.; Canavese, S. A.; Comelli, R. A.; F´ıgoli, N. S.
Appl. Catal. A 1998, 168, 93.
(19) Iglesia, E.; Barton, D. G.; Biscardi, J. A.; Guines, M. J. L.; Soled,
S. L. Catal. Today 1997, 38, 339.
(20) Young, R. A.; Sakthivel, A.; Moss, T. S.; Paiva-Santos, C. O. J.
Appl. Crystallogr. 1995, 28, 366.
(21) Rodr´ıguez-Carbajal, J. Laboratoire Leon Brillouin, France. Phone:
(22) Thompson, P.; Cox, D. E.; Hasting, J. B. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1987,
20, 79.
(23) Young, R. A.; Desai, P. Arch. Nauki Mat. 1989, 10, 71.
(24) Bokhimi, X.; Morales, A.; Novaro, O.; Portilla, M.; Lo´pez, T.;
Tzompantzi, F.; Go´mez, R. J. Solid State Chem. 1998, 135, 28.
(25) Salje, E. Acta Crystallogr. B 1982, 24, 1968.
(26) Prince, E. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1981, 14, 157.
(27) Brunauer, S.; Deming, L. S.; Deming, W. E.; Teller, E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1940, 38, 1723.
The sample prepared under hydrothermal treatment conditions
exhibited the highest density of surface acid sites, which was
responsible for the best catalytic activity in n-hexane isomer-
ization; however, due to its stronger acidity, 1.9% of cracking
products were produced during the reaction, this differs from
the other two catalysts on which selectivity to 100% isohexanes
was achieved but with slightly low conversion.
This work provides new experimental information on how
to obtain WOx-ZrO2 binary oxides with different WOx disper-
sions, surface acidity, and catalytic behaviors by treatment the
precipitating materials under controllable conditions. It also
illustrates how computer simulation (the Rietveld refinement)
combined with experimental techniques contributes to interpret
the variations of crystalline structure and catalytic properties
of the solids.
(28) Cabrera, S.; Haskouri, J. E.; Alamo, J.; Beltran, A.; Beltran, D.;
Mendioroz, S.; Marcos, M. D.; Amoros, P. AdV. Mater. 1999, 11, 379.
(29) Zhang Z.; Pinnavaia T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12294.
(30) Gutie´rrez, R.; Toledo, J. A.; Cortes-Jacome, M. A.; Va´zquez, A.;
Sebastia´n, P. J. Langmuir 2004, 20, 4265.
(31) Baertsch, C. D.; Soled, S. L.; Iglesia, E.; J. Phys. Chem. B 2001,
105, 1320.
(32) Yamagushi, T.; Tanabe, K. Mater. Chem. Phys. 1986, 16, 67.
(33) Shon, J. R.; Park, M. Y. Langmuir 1998, 14, 6140.
(34) Dongare, M. K.; Ramaswamy, V.; Gopinath, C. S.; Ramaswamy,
A. V.; Scheurell, S., Brueckner, M.; Kemnitz, E. J. Catal. 2001, 199, 209.
(35) Vu, T. N.; van Gestel, J.; Wilson, J. P.; Mollet, C.; Dath, J. P.;
Duchet, J. C. J. Catal. 2005, 231, 468.
(36) Duchet, J. C.; Guillaume, D.; Monnier, A.; Dujardin, C.; Wilson,
J. P.; van Gestel, J.; Szabo, G.; Nascimento, P. J. Catal. 2001, 198, 328.
(37) Singhal, A.; Toth, L. M.; Lin, J. S.; Affholter, K. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 11529.
(38) Garvie, R. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1965, 69, 1238.