3
356 Organometallics, Vol. 20, No. 15, 2001
Notes
product upon reaction in a stoichiometric 1 to 1 ratio in
toluene at 60 °C. An excess of 1,2-diiodoethane resulted
in the formation of a mixture of unknown products, none
of which could be purified by recrystallization. We
believe that the reaction with pure iodine failed because
the strongly oxidizing halogen molecule may not only
attack the In4 cluster in a nonspecific way but also
cleave In-C bonds. Therefore, we hoped to observe a
more specific reaction when we employed an AlI3/I2
mixture as the iodine source. The aluminum component
polarizes the iodine molecules, possibly by forming an
intermediate complex [I3AlIδ-‚‚‚I ], and the iodine
atom that bears a partial positive charge may react
preferably at the electron-rich cluster center of the
molecule. Indeed, we observed a clean reaction with
almost quantitative formation of only one product which
showed two resonances of trimethylsilyl groups in the
δ+ 11
1
H NMR spectrum in an intensity ratio of 2 to 1. The
product (2) was crystallized from toluene to give yellow
crystals in 73% yield. Compound 2 is thermally quite
stable in the solid state and decomposes only at 200 °C
with the formation of elemental indium. It is only
marginally stable in solution; indium powder precipi-
tates when it is stored in benzene or cyclohexane at
room temperature after about 1 h, forming several new
products, none of which could be isolated in pure form.
Owing to this instability, the NMR spectroscopic char-
acterization of 2 remained incomplete. The inner carbon
atoms attached to indium, which, owing to the quad-
rupole moment of the indium atoms, usually give very
broad signals, could not be detected unambiguously in
the 13C NMR spectrum of 2.
F igu r e 1. Molecular structure of 2. The thermal ellipsoids
are drawn at the 40% probability level. Methyl groups are
omitted for clarity. Important bond lengths (Å) and angles
(deg): In(1)-In(2) 2.8099(4), In(2)-In(3) 2.8186(4), In(1)-
I(1) 2.9880(4), In(1)-I(2) 3.0218(4), In(3)-I(1) 3.0189(4),
In(3)-I(2) 3.0034(4), In(1)-C(1) 2.218(4), In(2)-C(2)
2
.225(4), In(3)-C(3) 2.220(4), In(1)-In(2)-In(3) 82.44(1),
In(1)-I(1)-In(3) 76.26(1), In(1)-I(2)-In(3) 75.98(1).
trigallium compound of similar structure with a chain
of three gallium atoms has been reported. However, it,
surprisingly, has a strongly asymmetric, poorly under-
12
stood structure with one very long Ga-Ga distance.
A chain of three gallium atoms in a noncage structure
was observed for a trigallium pentaiodide in which all
gallium atoms are coordinatively saturated by the
Elemental indium precipitated in the course of that
1
reaction, and H-C(SiMe3)3 was detected by an H NMR
13
coordination of triethylphosphane ligands. The In-
spectrum of the crude product. Owing to the integration
of the spectrum, a 2 to 1 molar ratio resulted between
the product 2 and the alkane derivative. That alkane
is known as a decomposition product of the cluster and
may be formed via a radical intermediate after cleavage
of an In-C bond and the reaction of the radical with
the solvent, for instance. Interestingly, AlI3 alone gave
the same product (2) upon treatment with 1; however,
owing to unknown impurities, we did not succeed in
isolating the pure compound.
In bond lengths (2.814 Å on average) of 2 are shorter
than the In-In distances of the cluster compound 1
4
(
3.002 Å), which has a multicenter bonding situation.
They are in the normal range of In-In single bonds
observed for tetraalkyldiindium derivatives, R2In-
14,15
InR2.
Shorter ones were observed in the remarkable
triangular triindium compound In(InR2)3 (R ) 2,4,6-
15
iPr3C6H2). The In-I separations deviate only slightly
from the average value of 3.008 Å. They are similar to
those in other symmetrically bridged dimetallic spe-
The molecular structure of 2 (Figure 1) comprises a
short, nonlinear chain of three indium atoms which are
connected by In-In single bonds. Each indium atom is
bonded to one C(SiMe3)3 substituent, and the terminal
indium atoms also are attached to iodine atoms. The
iodine atoms bridge the terminal indium atoms, and a
trigonal bipyramidal cage structure results that has
both iodine atoms and one indium atom (In(2)) in the
equatorial plane and the remaining indium atoms
16
cies. Despite the different coordination geometries and
oxidation states (+1 at In2, +2 at In1 and In3) of the
indium atoms, the In-C bond lengths are almost
indistinguishable (2.221 Å on average). A similarly long
In-C distance was observed in the starting indium(I)
(12) Li, X.-W.; Wei, P.; Beck, B. C.; Xie, Y.; Schaefer, H. F., III; Su,
J .; Robinson, G. H. Chem. Commun. 2000, 453.
(13) Schnepf, A.; Doriat, C.; M o¨ llhausen, E.; Schn o¨ ckel, H. Chem.
Commun. 1997, 2111.
(
In(1) and In(3)) in the apical positions. Thus, In1 and
(14) (a) Uhl, W.; Layh, M.; Hiller, W. J . Organomet. Chem. 1989,
68, 139. (b) Wochele, R.; Schwarz, W.; Klinkhammer, K. W.; Locke,
K.; Weidlein, J . Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2000, 626, 1963. (c) Wiberg, N.;
Amelunxen, K.; N o¨ th, H.; Schmidt, M.; Schwenk, H. Angew. Chem.
1996, 108, 110; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 65. (d) von
H a¨ nisch, C.; Fenske, D.; Kattannek, M.; Ahlrichs, R. Angew. Chem.
3
In3 are coordinatively saturated with coordination
number 4, while In2 is attached only to three atoms
(In1, In3, C2) in an almost ideal planar coordination
geometry (sum of the angles ) 359.7°). A diphosphorus-
1
999, 111, 2900; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2736. (e) Schluter,
R. D.; Cowley, A. H.; Atwood, D. A.; J ones, R. A.; Bond, M. R.; Carrano,
C. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 2070.
(15) Brothers, P. J .; H u¨ bler, K.; H u¨ bler, U.; Noll, B. C.; Olmstead,
M. M.; Power, P. P. Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 2528; Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2355.
(16) (a) Haupt, H.-J .; Wolfes, W.; Preut, H. Inorg. Chem. 1976, 15,
2920. (b) Haupt, H.-J .; Preut, H.; Wolfes, W. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.
1979, 448, 93. (c) Leman, J . T.; Ziller, J . W.; Barron, A. R. Organo-
metallics 1991, 10, 1766.
(
11) (a) The polarization of halogen molecules by Lewis acids as
discussed here is well accepted for the chlorination or bromination of
aromatic compounds, while the mechanism of the corresponding
reactions with less reactive iodine seems to be more complicated:
March, J . Advanced Organic Chemistry, 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York,
1
985; p 476. (b) The occurrence of I+ as a reactive intermediate has
been discussed in the literature, for instance: Baird, W. C., J r.;
Surridge, J . H. J . Org. Chem. 1970, 35, 3436.