S. Budagumpi et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 45 (2010) 455–462
461
media was prepared, autoclaved for 15 min at 121 ꢁC, 15 lb pres-
sure. The autoclaved media were inoculated with the seed culture
and incubated at 37 ꢁC for 24 h.
Isolation of DNA: DNA was isolated using the procedure
mentioned below,
The fresh bacterial culture (1.5 ml) was centrifuged to obtain the
pellet and made to dissolve in 0.5 ml of lysis buffer (100 mM tris pH
8.0, 50 mM EDTA, 50 mM lysozyme) and to which added 0.5 ml of
saturated phenol followed by the incubation at 55 ꢁC for 10 min.
The resultant mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min
and to the supernatant, equal volume of chloroform and isoamyl
alcohol (24.1) and 1/20th volume of 3 M sodium acetate (pH 4.8)
were added and further, centrifuged at the same conditions. Soon
after, 3 volumes of chilled absolute alcohol were added and so
obtained DNA was separated by centrifugation. Finally the pellet
was dried and dissolved in TE buffer (10 mM tris pH 8.0, 1 mM
EDTA) and stored in cool.
4.2.5. Methodology for DNA binding analysis using viscosity
measurement
Viscosity measurements were carried out using an Oswald micro-
viscometer, maintained at constant temperature (29 ꢁC) in a thermo-
stat. The DNA concentration was kept constant in all samples, but the
complex concentration was increased each time (from 50 to
250 mM). Mixing of the solution was achieved by bubbling the
nitrogen gas through viscometer. The mixture was left for 10 min at
29 ꢁC after addition of each aliquot of complex. The flow time was
measured with a digital stopwatch. The experiment was repeated in
1/3
triplicate to get the concurrent values. Data are presented as (
versus the ratio [complex]/[DNA], where
viscosity of DNA in presence and in absence of the complex respec-
h/h0)
h
and h0 are the specific
tively. The values of
h
and h0 were calculated by using equation (2),
h
¼ ðt ꢀ t Þ t
(2)
=
b
b
where tb is the observed flow time of DNA containing solution and,
t is the flow time of buffer alone. Relative viscosities for DNA were
calculated from the relation (h/h0).
Sample preparation: The samples (10 mg/ml) were prepared in
DMSO.
Treatment of DNA with the samples: The synthetic compounds
(100 mg) were added separately to the DNA sample of E. coli. The
4.2.6. Methodology for thermal denaturation study
sample mixtures were incubated at 37 ꢁC for 2 h.
Thermal denaturation studies were carried out on UV–visible
spectrometer, equipped with temperature controlling thermostat.
The melting curves (Tm) of both free E. coli DNA and E. coli DNA
bound complexes were obtained by measuring the hyper-
chromicity of E. coli DNA at 260 nm as a function of temperature.
Agarose gel-electrophoresis: To know the DNA cleavage action of
compounds, 200 mg of agarose was dissolved in 25 ml of TAE buffer
(4.84 g Tris base, pH 8.0, 0.5 M EDTA/1 L) by boiling and poured into
the gel cassette fitted with a comb. When the gel attained w55 ꢁC,
allowed to solidify and then, comb was removed carefully. So
obtained solid gel was placed in the electrophoresis chamber floo-
The melting temperatures were measured in 50 mM DNA in the
same buffer at pH 7.2. The temperature was scanned from 25 to
80 ꢁC at a speed of 5 ꢁC per min. The melting temperature (Tm) was
taken as the mid-point of the hyperchromic transition.
ded with TAE buffer. Subsequently 20 mL of DNA sample (mixed with
bromophenol blue dye at 1:1 ratio) was loaded carefully into the
wells, along with standard DNA marker and the constant 50 V of
electricity was made to pass for around 30 min. Finally, the gel was
removed carefully and stained with ETBR (Ethidium bromide)
Acknowledgments
solution (10 mg/ml) for 10–15 min and the bands were observed
under UV transilluminator. The illuminated gel was photographed
by using a polaroid camera (a red filter and polaroid film were used).
The authors thank the USIC, Karnatak University, Dharwad for
providing spectral facility. Recording of FAB mass spectra (CDRI
Lucknow) and ESR spectra (IIT Bombay) are gratefully acknowl-
edged. The authors thank (Srinivasa Budagumpi) University Grants
Commission, New Delhi, India for awarding Research Fellowship in
Science for Meritorious Students and Karnatak University, Dhar-
wad, Karnataka, India (Naveen V. Kulkarni and Sathisha M.P.) for
providing research fellowships.
4.2.4. Methodology for DNA binding analysis using electronic
spectral method
The concentration of E. coli DNA per nucleotide [C(p)] was
measured by using its known extinction coefficient at 260 nm
(6600 Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1) [30]. The absorbance at 260 nm (A260) and at
280 nm (A280) for E. coli DNA was measured to check its purity. The
ratio A260/A280 was found to be 2.22, indicating that E. coli DNA is
satisfactorily free from protein. Buffer [5 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)
aminomethane, pH 7.2, 50 mM EDTA] was used for the absorption,
viscosity, and thermal denaturation experiments.
References
[1] (a) S. Komeda, M. Lutz, L.A. Spek, Y. Yamanaka, T. Sato, S. Chikuma, J. Reedijk,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 4738–4746;
(b) Y. Xia, C.-D. Fan, B.-X. Zhao, J. Zhao, D.-S. Shin, J.-Y. Miao, Eur. J. Med. Chem.
43 (2008) 2347–2353.
[2] C. Chopard, C. Lenoir, S. Rizzato, M. Vidal, J. Arpalahti, L. Gabison, A. Albinati,
C. Garbay, J. Kozelka, Inorg. Chem. 47 (2008) 9701–9705.
[3] F. Caruso, C. Pettinari, F. Marchetti, P. Natanti, C. Phillips, J. Tanski, M. Rossi,
Inorg. Chem. 46 (2007) 7553–7560.
[4] A. Prokofieva, I. Alexander, P.S. Dechert, F. Meyer, Chem. Commun. (2008)
1005–1007.
[5] J. Klingele, I. Alexander, P. Guido Leibeling, S. Demeshko, S. Dechert, F. Meyer,
J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. (2007) 2003–2013.
[6] A.L. Gavrilova, B. Bosnich, Chem. Rev. 104 (2004) 349–384.
[7] (a) M. Abid, A.R. Bhat, F. Athar, A. Azam, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 44 (2009) 417–425;
(b) F. Meyer, A. Jacobi, B. Nuber, P. Rutsch, L. Zsolnai, Inorg. Chem. 37 (1998)
1213–1218.
[8] (a) R.A. Bhat, F. Athar, A. Azam, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 44 (2009) 426–431;
(b) J.A. Vincent, K. Manoj, M. Jose, L. Laurent, N. Pilar, G.–E. Enrique, A.R. Jose,
V.L. Santiago, E. Beatriz, J. Org. Chem. 64 (1999) 6135–6146.
[9] L.J. Bellamy, The Infrared Spectra of Complex Molecules, third ed. Methuen,
London, 1954.
[10] V.H. Arali, V.K. Revankar, V.B. Mahale, Transition. Met. Chem.18 (1993) 158–161.
[11] A.D. Naik, S.M. Annigeri, U.B. Gangadharmath, V.K. Revankar, V.B. Mahale,
J. Mol. Struct. 616 (2002) 119–127.
[12] (a) S. Budagumpi, M.P. Sathisha, N.V. Kulkarni, G.S. Kurdekar, V.K. Revankar,
J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. (2009) doi:10.1007/s10847-009-9649-z.
(b) S. Sujatha, T.M. Rajendiran, R. Kannappan, R. Venkatesan, P.S. Rao, Proc.
In absorption studies the complex was dissolved in DMSO to get
the desired concentration. The spectroscopic titrations were carried
out by adding increasing amounts (20
ml, 40 ml, 60 ml, 80 ml and
100 l) of E. coli DNA to a solution of the complex at a fixed
m
concentration contained in a quartz cell. The UV–Vis spectra were
recorded after equilibration at 20 ꢁC for 10 min after each addition.
The intrinsic binding constant Kb was determined from the plot of
[DNA]/(3a
ꢀ
3f) vs. [DNA] according to equation (1).
h
i
ꢀ
ꢁ
ꢀ
ꢁ
ꢀ
ꢁ
½DNAꢄ= 3a
ꢀ
3f ¼ ½DNAꢄ= 3b
ꢀ
3f þ 1= Kb 3b
ꢀ
3f
(1)
where [DNA] is the concentration of DNA in base pairs, the apparent
absorption coefficients 3a, 3f and 3b correspond to Aobs/[complex],
extinction coefficient for the free complex and the extinction co-
efficient of the complex in the totally bound form, respectively. The
data were fitted to Eq. (1), with a slope equal to 1/(3b
y-intercept equal to 1/[K (3b 3f)] and Kb was obtained from the
ratio of the slope to the intercept.
ꢀ
3f) and
ꢀ