Please do not adjust margins
Dalton Transactions
Page 2 of 5
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
Sample characterizations
DOI: 10.1039/C8DT02377H
−
of the carboxylate group [i.e. νas(–COO ) and νs(–COO )] of
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on
a
1
terephthalate moiety. The peaks at 3055 and 1500 cm− are
PANalytical Empyrean diffractometer with Cu Kα1 radiation (λ
= 1.5406 Å, operating at 40 kV and 40 mA). Scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) images were taken from a JSM-6701F (JEOL,
Japan) field emission scanning electron microscope and a
Quanta 200F environmental scanning electron microscope (FEI,
Netherlands). The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum
due to the aromatic C–H and C=C stretching, respectively.
Additionally, the bands at 818 and 1015 cm−1 corresponding to
para out-of-plane aromatic C–H wag and para in-plane
aromatic C–H bend also can be clearly observed. Three bands
1
at 3588, 3425 and 3345 cm− represent the OH stretching
vibrations from OH− and water. The band at 605 cm−1 then can
be assigned to Fe–O vibration. Therefore, the FTIR results
further confirm the formation of iron terephthalate.
was obtained on
a Tensor II FTIR spectrometer (Bruker,
Germany) in KBr medium at room temperature.
The morphology of the as-grown Fe(OH)(Tp) sample on Ni
foam was investigated by SEM observations. As shown in Fig.
1c, the low-magnification SEM image reveals that the Ni foam
skeleton is fully covered by a mass of Fe(OH)(Tp) sample
through the in-situ growth. The dense coating of the sample
on such a three-dimensional framework of Ni foam would
necessarily make for a high mass loading of the active
materials. It is worthwhile to point out that the high mass
loading per area is generally a critical requirement for the
practical applications of supercapacitor devices. The
corresponding high-magnification SEM image (Fig. 1d) shows
that the product consists of micro-sized polyhedral crystals
with a relatively broad size distribution. These Fe(OH)(Tp)
polyhedra are tightly anchored on the Ni foam substrate,
guaranteeing a good contact between the active materials and
current collector for supercapacitor applications.
To evaluate the electrochemical performances of the as-
fabricated electrode, cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic
charge/discharge (GCD), and electrochemical impedance
spectroscopy (EIS) tests were conducted. Fig. 2a displays the
CV curves of the Fe(OH)(Tp) electrode within the potential
range of 0~0.5 V (vs. Hg/HgO) at different scan rates. The clear
redox peaks imply that the typical capacitive characteristic of
the Fe(OH)(Tp) electrode should be mainly dominated by
Faradaic redox reaction, which may be described as Fe(OH)(Tp)
+ OH− ↔ Fe(OH)2Tp + e−. It is noted that the oxidation peaks
Electrochemical measurements
The prepared Fe(OH)(Tp) on Ni foam was directly applied as
the positive electrode with an active area of 1
×
1 cm2. The
negative electrode was prepared by pasting the slurry
consisting of activated carbon, acetylene black and
polyvinylidene fluoride binder with a mass ratio of 8:1:1 on
nickel foam. The asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC) device was
assembled as a Teflon Swagelok type cell using nonwoven
fabric membrane as the separator and 3 M KOH aqueous
solution as the electrolyte. A typical three-electrode system
was used to test the electrochemical properties of the
electrode on a CHI 760E electrochemical workstation (Chenhua
Instruments, Shanghai, China) in 3 M KOH aqueous electrolyte
using platinum sheet and Hg/HgO electrode as the counter and
reference electrodes, respectively. The electrochemical
performances of the ASC device were then tested on the
electrochemical workstation using a two-electrode mode.
Results and discussion
The phase structure of the product grown on Ni foam was
identified by XRD, as shown in Fig. 1a. Evidently, in the high
angle region (2θ > 40°), three distinctly strong diffraction peaks
located at 44.3°, 51.7° and 76.2° can be undoubtedly indexed
to the face-centred cubic Ni phase (JCPDS Card 65−0380),
corresponding to the Ni foam substrate. As for the remaining
XRD peaks, it is noteworthy that no JCPDS cards with respect
to Fe-based terephthalates can be found to match with them.
Sherif has reported three forms of iron terephthalates (JCPDS
Cards 33−1722; 33−1723; 33−1724),23 but all the three card
files are unavailable for indexing the as-grown sample.
Fortunately, it is interesting that the XRD patterns of the
sample are actually similar with nickel hydroxide terephthalate
also reported by Sherif (35−1677).23 In this context, it should
be believable that the synthesized product on Ni foam
substrate can be indexed to iron (II) hydroxide terephthalate.
Accordingly, the calculated lattice constants of a = 9.7858 Å, b
= 7.4202 Å, c = 11.0682 Å and α = 101.230°, β = 83.904°, γ =
92.791° with a triclinic system (space group P−1) can be
achieved. It can be seen that the experimental XRD patterns
can be in good agreement with the corresponding simulated
ones. Therefore, the Ni foam supported sample can be
determined as ferrous hydroxide terephthalate. FTIR
spectroscopy (Fig. 1b) was further examined to verify the
structure of the product. Two dominant bands at 1575 and
Fig.
1 (a) XRD patterns, (b) FTIR spectrum, (c) low-magnification and (d) high-
magnification SEM images of the as-synthesized Ni foam supported Fe(OH)(Tp) sample.
2 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins