Atomic-Scale Insights on Chlorinated γ-Alumina Surfaces
A R T I C L E S
acidity. For instance, the chlorination of alumina is used to
improve alkylation7 or cracking8 reactions. The chlorination of
the γ-alumina surfaces is accomplished by the use of various
chlorinating agents (HCl, CCl4, or AlCl3). The quantity of
chlorine fixed and the resulting acidity depend on the chlorinat-
ing agents and of the reaction conditions (temperature, partial
pressure of chlorinating agents, and water) used for the
chlorination. For reforming, the quantity of chlorine added is
about 1-2 wt %, whereas for isomerization, the chlorine content
may reach 6-7 wt %. The chlorination occurs always by
chemical exchange of the surface hydroxyl (-OH) groups.4,9
Since this exchange is reversible, the chemical potential of water
in the reaction environment must be controlled because an
excess of water could be detrimental to the stability of chlorine
at the surface. In addition, it is also known that the chlorine
addition may prevent the sintering of metallic clusters by
ensuring high dispersion state and low Pt-Pt coordination
number.6 In industrial conditions, to maintain this high disper-
sion state, the catalyst is continuously regenerated under a
chlorinated atmosphere. Moreover, depending on the chlorine
content of the catalyst’s support, this coordination number may
reach values below 4.6,10 Moreover, XAFS studies seem to
indicate that the nature of the support may modify the electronic
features of small Pt clusters11 and, as a result, the hydrogen
adsorption property of those clusters.12 Recent density functional
theory (DFT) studies have underlined the role of the hydration
state of the γ-alumina surfaces on the adsorption and diffusion
properties of Pdn (1 e n e 5) clusters.13,14 The hydration state
influences the distribution of hydroxyl (-OH) groups and Lewis
acid aluminum sites. In particular, it has been shown that the
adsorption mode of ethylene on γ-alumina-supported Pd4
clusters depends on the hydroxylation state of the γ-alumina
surfaces.15 As a consequence, further improvements of metallic
active phases highly dispersed on doped γ-alumina surfaces are
expected to be directly linked with deeper understanding of the
nano- and atomic-scale properties of the doped surfaces. A
challenging question concerns the role of the hydroxylation state
and crystallographic orientation of the γ-alumina surfaces when
doped by anionic and cationic species. However, the use of small
Pt4/(X2O)3 clusters (X ) F, H, Na) as proposed in refs 12 and
16 cannot be fully satisfactory to describe the surface state of
the support. This approach may raise questions about the
overestimate of the effect of the X2O ligand and the simulta-
neous underestimate of surface rearrangements which modify
the nature of the chemical interactions between Pt clusters and
the doped γ-alumina surfaces. In contrast, recent periodic DFT
calculations have brought many relevant insights about the
bulk17–19 and surface properties 20–22 of γ-alumina under realistic
environment. In particular, the effect of various reaction
conditions such as temperature, partial pressures of reactants
20,21,23–25
(such as H2O, H2S, H2)
were included to determine
the precise surface state of γ-alumina. More recently, we have
also proposed a rational model based on DFT calculations and
infrared (IR) characterization to explain the poisoning of the
γ-alumina surface acidity by the sodium cation.26 In particular,
Na cations were found to be located in an inner sphere complex
of surface hydroxyls and oxygen atoms after exchanging protons
from surface µ3-OH groups. This model’s chemistry significantly
differs from that of the cluster model used in reference 12.
However, even if the adsorption of HCl molecules on ideal
dehydrated R-alumina (0001) surface has been investigated by
periodic DFT simulation,27 the challenging study of chlorinated
γ-alumina surface remained to be undertaken.
According to the crucial role of chlorine as surface modifier
of γ-alumina properties, the determination of reliable surface
models of chlorinated γ-alumina is an important question. In
the context of reforming, the balance between H2O and HCl is
known to be critical for optimizing the physical chemical
properties of the metallic active phase. In this paper, we thus
propose to use density functional theory (DFT) and infrared
(IR) analysis of chlorinated γ-alumina nanocrystalline samples
synthesized in well-defined conditions in order to build realistic
theoretical models of chlorinated γ-Al2O3 surfaces for various
chlorine coverages. First the stable location of the chlorine
elements on the surface is determined, and the impact of the
surface OH stretching frequencies is discussed with respect to
the IR experimental results. The influence of chlorine on surface
acidity is also studied by means of pyridine adsorption calcula-
tions. Then, a thermodynamic model is proposed in combination
with DFT results to determine the domains of stability of
hydroxyl and chlorine species at the surface. Finally, the
calculation of chlorine contents of the γ-alumina surface as a
function of temperature and the partial pressures of H2O and
HCl is presented. It is shown how this model is expected to
find practical applications in the reforming and isomerization
processes, where these parameters are fixed in order to control
the catalytic surface state.
Theoretical Methods
Total Energy Calculation. The computational method used
for total energy calculation is coherent with the one used in
our previous published works where the hydroxylated surfaces
(17) Krokidis, X.; Raybaud, P.; Gobichon, A.-E.; Rebours, B.; Euzen, P.;
Toulhoat, H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 5121.
(18) Wolverton, C.; Haas, K. C. Phys. ReV. B 2001, 63, 024102.
(19) Paglia, G.; Buckley, C. E.; Rohl, A. L.; Hunter, B. A.; Hart, R. D.;
Hanna, J. V.; Byrne, L. T. Phys. ReV. B 2003, 68, 144110.
(20) Digne, M.; Sautet, P.; Raybaud, P.; Euzen, P.; Toulhoat, H. J. Catal.
2002, 211, 1.
(7) Clet, G.; Goupil, J. M.; Szabo, G.; Cornet, D. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
1999, 148, 253.
(8) Guillaume, D.; Gautier, S.; Alario, F.; Deve`s, J. M. Oil Gas Sci.
Technol. 1997, 54 (4), 537.
(9) Gates, B. C.; Katzer, J. R.; Schuit, G. C. A. Chemistry of Catalytic
Processes; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1979.
(21) Digne, M.; Sautet, P.; Raybaud, P.; Euzen, P.; Toulhoat, H. J. Catal.
2004, 226, 54.
(10) Berdala, J.; Freund, E.; Lynch, J. P. J. Phys. (Paris) 1986, 47, C8–
269.
(22) Valero, M. C.; Digne, M.; Sautet, P.; Raybaud, P. Oil Gas Sci. Technol.
2006, 61, 535.
(11) Ramaker, D. E.; Oudenhuijzen, M. K.; Koningsberger, D. C. J. Phys.
Chem. B 2005, 109, 5608.
(23) Arrouvel, C.; Digne, M.; Breysse, M.; Toulhoat, H.; Raybaud, P. J.
Catal. 2004, 222, 152.
(12) Oudenhuijzen, M. K.; Bokhoven, J. A. v.; Miller, J. T.; Ramaker, D. E.;
Koningsberger, D. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1530.
(13) Valero, M. C.; Raybaud, P.; Sautet, P. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110,
1759.
(24) Arrouvel, C.; Breysse, M.; Toulhoat, H.; Raybaud, P. J. Catal. 2004,
226, 260.
(25) Joubert, J.; Fleurat-Lessard, P.; Delbecq, F.; Sautet, P. J. Phys. Chem.
B 2006, 110, 7392.
(14) Valero, M. C.; Raybaud, P.; Sautet, P. Phys. ReV. B 2007, 045427.
(15) Valero, M. C.; Raybaud, P.; Sautet, P. J. Catal. 2007, 247, 339.
(16) Thomson, J.; Webb, G.; Webster, B. C.; Winfield, J. M. J. Chem.
Soc., Faraday Trans. 1995, 91, 155.
(26) Digne, M.; Raybaud, P.; Sautet, P.; Guillaume, D.; Toulhoat, H. Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 2577.
(27) Alavi, S.; Sorescu, D. C.; Thompson, D. L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003,
107, 186.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 33, 2008 11031