2122 Organometallics, Vol. 17, No. 10, 1998
Notes
characteristic 1H NMR spectrum, whereas H2 was
were recorded by using a Perkin-Elmer Physical Electronics
(PHI) model 5100 ESCA spectrometer with a Mg KR1,2 X-ray
source (1253.6 eV) with a 180° hemispherical detector. The
spectrometer was calibrated to the Ag3d5/2 peak at 367.9 eV.
Spectra were collected at an angle of 45°. The identity of the
elements at the surface were evaluated qualitatively with low-
resolution spectra (89.45 eV), whereas high-resolution spectra
(35.75 eV) were used to establish the binding energies and
peak areas for quantitative analysis. X-ray powder diffraction
data were recorded by using a Siemens D-500 X-ray diffrac-
tometer with Cu KR radiation. Melting points were observed
in a Mel-Temp by using flame-sealed capillaries. Molecular
weights were measured cryoscopically in benzene by using an
instrument similar to that described by Shriver and Drezdzon.7
Rea ction of C10H8[Ga (CH2CMe3)2]2‚Na Cl w ith An h y-
d r ou s NH3. The yellow gallium(III) dihydronaphthalene
derivative C10H8[Ga(CH2CMe3)2]2‚2NaCl was prepared in THF
at -78 °C as previously described1 by using sodium metal
(0.067 g, 2.9 mmol), naphthalene (0.380 g, 2.97 mmol), and
Ga(CH2CMe3)2Cl (0.721 g, 2.91 mmol). Then, excess dry NH3
was added to the flask by vacuum distillation. Initially, the
solution had an intense yellow color. As the solution was
stirred at -78 °C for 18 h, the color disappeared and a colorless
solution and a colorless precipitate formed. Pressure mea-
surements at -196 °C on the vacuum line confirmed the
absence of any noncondensable gas. The THF and excess NH3
were removed by vacuum distillation. The remaining reaction
products were subjected to dynamic vacuum for 40 h. The
products, which were volatile at room temperature, were
collected in a -196 °C trap and identified by 1H NMR
spectroscopy as dihydronaphthalene with very small amounts
of naphthalene and other unidentified impurities. Extraction
of the nonvolatile products with pentane through a glass frit
separated NaCl (0.168 g, 2.88 mmol, 99.0% yield based on Na)
from a pentane-soluble colorless solid. Sublimation of this
solid at 55 °C led to the isolation and identification of (Me3-
CCH2)2GaNH2 (0.344 g, 1.51 mmol, 52% yield based on Na).
(Me3CCH2)2Ga NH2. Mp: 51.8-54.0 °C. 1H NMR (C6D6):
δ 1.10 (s, 9.3H, -CH3), 0.63 (s, 2.2H, -CH2-), 0.34 (s, br, 1.0H,
-NH2). IR (Nujol mull, cm-1): 3870 (vw), 3400 (m), 3325 (m),
3295 (vw), 3205 (w, br), 2735 (w), 2705 (m), 2400 (vw), 2370
(vw), 2280 (vw), 2270 (vw), 2100 (vw), 2010 (vw), 1982 (vw),
1650 (w), 1565 (w), 1355 (s), 1230 (s), 1133 (m), 1099 (s), 1013
(m), 997 (s), 930 (m), 908 (w), 846 (m), 800 (s), 743 (s), 700 (s),
628 (s), 590 (m), 574 (m), 520 (w), 455 (sh), 435 (vs), 382 (m),
328 (w), 288 (m), 245 (w).
Rea ction of Ga (CH2CMe3)3 w ith NH3 a t 140-150 °C. A
break-seal tube was charged with Ga(CH2CMe3)3 (1.42 g, 5.02
mmol) and purified NH3 (5.03 mmol) and then sealed by fusion.
The tube was heated at 140-150 °C for 4 days in a tube
furnace and then opened. Noncondensable gas (-196 °C) was
absent. The volatile products were separated, weighed (0.384
g), and the neopentane was identified by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
The colorless solid remaining in the tube was sublimed at 60-
80 °C and identified as (Me3CCH2)2GaNH2 (0.996 g, 4.37 mmol,
87.3% yield based on Ga(CH2CMe3)3.
(Me3CCH2)2Ga NH2. Mp: 58.8-60.8 °C. Cryoscopic mo-
lecular weight, benzene solution, formula weight 228.03
(observed molality, observed mol wt, association): 0.0796, 490,
2.15; 0.0562, 477, 2.09; 0.0284, 499, 2.19. The 1H NMR and
IR spectra were identical to those described above.
Rea ction of [Ga (CH2CMe3)]n w ith Am m on ia . A break-
seal tube was charged with 0.440 g of [Ga(CH2CMe3)]n (3.13
mmol), and then 3.44 mmol of NH3 was added by vacuum
distillation. The tube was sealed by fusion and heated for 1
day at 460-480 °C. As the reaction occurred, the contents of
the tube changed from dark reddish-brown to light gray to
yellow gray and finally to shiny black. The tube was cooled
1/n [Ga(CH2CMe3)]n + NH3 f
GaN(s) + CMe4 + H2 (3)
identified by its typical properties in the vacuum line.
The shiny black solid remaining in the tube was
identified as GaN (hexagonal) by its X-ray powder
pattern and ESCA spectrum. The ESCA spectrum
confirmed the presence of gallium, nitrogen, carbon, and
oxygen. However, an elemental analysis of the shiny
black solid revealed very low carbon contamination,
1.24% C and 0.69% H. It is of interest to note that when
GaN(s) is prepared from GaMe3 and NH3, temperatures
in the range of ∼1000 °C are needed.5 Thus, the lower
temperatures used for the reaction of the gallium(I)
compound with ammonia might reflect a significant
relationship between the low oxidation state and inter-
mediates in the pathway for the formation of group 13-
15 materials.
The reaction between Ga(CH2CMe3)2Cl and sodium
in liquid ammonia also was studied. Addition of a
stoichiometric quantity of Ga(CH2CMe3)2Cl dissolved in
ammonia at -70 °C to the deep blue solution formed
between sodium and liquid ammonia resulted in the
formation of a colorless solution and a heavy colorless
precipitate. Subsequent use of the vacuum line revealed
the formation of slightly less than 0.5 mol of hydrogen
gas per mole of Ga(CH2CMe3)2Cl. Thus, the balanced
equation shown in eq 4 describes the reaction.
Ga(CH2CMe3)2Cl + Na + NH3 Liquid ammonia8
(Me3CCH2)2GaNH2 + 1/2H2 + NaCl (4)
The compound (Me3CCH2)2GaNH2 was fully charac-
terized by its melting point, 1H NMR and IR spectra, C
and H analyses, and a cryoscopic molecular weight
study in benzene solution. All data are consistent with
the presence of a dimer in solution and in the solid state
with a melting point of 58.0-60.5 °C. The correspond-
ing methyl derivative6 Me2GaNH2 exists as a trimer
with a higher melting point (100-101.5 °C).
Exp er im en ta l Section
All compounds described in this investigation were very
sensitive to oxygen and moisture and were manipulated by
using standard vacuum line techniques or under a purified
argon atmosphere in a Vacuum Atmospheres drybox equipped
with a Dry Train. All solvents were purified before use.
Elemental analyses were performed by E+R Microanalytical
Laboratories, Corona, NY. Infrared spectra of samples as
Nujol mulls between CsI plates were recorded by means of a
Perkin-Elmer 683 spectrometer. The 1H NMR spectra were
recorded at 300 MHz by using a Varian Gemini 300 spectrom-
eter. All samples for NMR spectra were contained in flame-
sealed NMR tubes. Chemical shifts are reported in δ (ppm)
and are referenced to tetramethylsilane (TMS) as δ ) 0.00 ppm
and benzene as δ ) 7.15 ppm. X-ray photoelectron spectra
(5) (a) Addamiano, A. J . J . Electrochem. Soc. 1961, 108, 1072. (b)
Munir, Z. A.; Searcy, A. W. J . Chem. Phys. 1965, 42, 4223. (c) Pichugin,
I. G.; Searcy, D. A. Inorg. Mater. 1970, 6, 1732. (d) Isherwood, B. J .;
Wickenden, D. K. J . Mater. Sci. 1970, 5, 869. (e) Ejder, E. J . Cryst.
Growth 1974, 22, 44. (f) Ogino, T.; Aoki, M. J . Appl. Phys. 1979, 18,
1049.
(7) Shriver, D. F.; Drezdzon, M. A. The Manipulation of Air-Sensitive
Compounds; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1968; p 38.
(6) Coates, G. E. J . Chem. Soc. 1951, 2003.