Paper
NJC
5
6
7
8
9
I. Ivanov, T. Vidakovi ˇc -Koch and K. Sundmacher, Energies,
2010, 3, 803–846.
D. Leech, P. Kavanagh and W. Schuhmann, Electrochim.
Acta, 2012, 84, 223–234.
M. Fern ´a ndez-Fern ´a ndez, M. Sanrom ´a n and D. Moldes,
Biotechnol. Adv., 2013, 131, 405–412.
I. Bento, L. O. Martins, G. G. Lopes, M. A. Carrondo and
P. F. Lindley, Dalton Trans., 2005, 3507–3513.
E. I. Solomon, U. M. Sundaram and T. E. Machonkin,
Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 2563–2605.
1
0 K. Piontek, M. Antorini and T. Choinowski, J. Biol. Chem.,
002, 277, 37663–37669.
Fig. 4 Scheme representing the appropriate orientation of the T1 site 11 R. P. Bonomo, B. M. G. Castronovo and A. M. Santoro,
2
of laccase towards the electrode and a possible electron pathway for
dioxygen reduction.
Dalton Trans., 2004, 104–112.
1
2 C. Fern ´a ndez-S ´a nchez, T. Tzanov, G. M. G u¨ bitz and
A. Cavaco-Paulo, Bioelectrochemistry, 2002, 58, 149–156.
3 K. Karnicka, K. Miecznikowski, B. Kowalewska, M. Skunik,
M. Opallo, J. Rogalski, W. Schuhmann and P. J. Kulesza,
Anal. Chem., 2008, 80, 7643–7648.
4 M. S. Thorum, C. A. Anderson, J. J. Hatch, A. S. Campbell,
N. M. Marshall, S. C. Zimmerman, Y. Lu and A. A. Gewirth,
J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2010, 1, 2251–2254.
1
MUATyr (without FcH), yielded only a slight increase in the
cathodic current upon the diffusion of dioxygen, while the cathodic
wave was not detected (Fig. S3, ESI†). This way the mediator role of
FcH was confirmed.
1
Both the onset of dioxygen reduction at 0.80 V, within the
range reported for laccaseT1 site potential (0.69–1.00 V), and the
maximum reduction current reached at 0.52 V are in agreement
with previous reports and support the assignment of the latter
1
5 X. Wu, Y. Hu, J. Jin, N. Zhou, P. Wu, H. Zhang and C. Cai,
Anal. Chem., 2010, 82, 3588–3596.
16 S. C. Barton, H.-H. Kim, G. Binyamin, Y. Zhang and
1
5,18
electrochemical signal to dioxygen reduction.
These results
A. Heller, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105, 11917–11921.
confirmed the capability of this bioelectrode to effectively immo-
bilize laccase and to promote the reduction of molecular dioxygen
at low potentials.
1
7 M. Pita, C. Gutierrez-Sanchez, D. Olea, M. Velez, C. Garcia-
Diego, S. Shleev, V. M. Fernandez and A. L. D. Lacey, J. Phys.
Chem. C, 2011, 115, 13420–13428.
18 N. S. Parimi, Y. Umasankar, P. Atanassov and R. P.
Ramasamy, ACS Catal., 2012, 2, 38–44.
Conclusions
1
9 X. Wang, R.-M. Latonen, P. Sj o¨ berg-Eerola, J.-E. Eriksson,
J. Bobacka, H. Boer and M. Bergelin, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011,
Laccase was supramolecularly immobilized as a second mono-
layer on gold surfaces previously modified with a mixed SAM of
MUATyr and FcH. In the studied system the terminal Tyr
moieties on the electrode served to associate to the T1 site
through p–p interactions in order to properly orient it towards
the surface. When a multivalent supramolecular association of
an enzyme is accomplished, as is our case, the conformation
should be externally stabilized. Under such conditions, an
efficient ET process between the enzyme and the gold electrode
enabled the reduction of dioxygen with a high current density.
Operational variables (pH, ionic strength) and lifetime are
under investigation for future biofuel cell applications.
115, 5919–5929.
2
2
2
2
0 T. Kuwahara, T. Asano, M. Kondo and M. Shimomura,
Bioelectrochemistry, 2013, 91, 28–31.
1 B. Willner, E. Katz and I. Willner, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.,
2
006, 17, 589–596.
2 R. Villalonga, R. Cao and A. Fragoso, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107,
088–3116.
3 D. G. Abradelo, R. Cao and S. Schlecht, RSC Adv., 2013, 3,
1461–21465.
2
2
3
2
2
2
4 Y. Liu and S. Dong, Electroanalysis, 2008, 20, 827–832.
5 P. Scodeller, R. Carballo, R. Szamocki, L. Levin,
F. Forchiassin and E. J. Calvo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010,
1
32, 11132–11140.
Notes and references
2
6 A. Heller and B. Feldman, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 2482–2505.
1
A. Ramanavicius, A. Kausaitea and A. Ramanavicienea, 27 C. Nogues and M. Wanunu, Surf. Sci., 2004, 573, L383–L389.
Biosens. Bioelectron., 2008, 24, 761–766.
28 M. C. Rodr ´ı guez-Arg u¨ elles, R. Villalonga, C. Serra, R. Cao,
M. Sanrom ´a n and M. A. Longo, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2010,
348, 96–100.
29 M. L. Niku-Paavola, E. Karhunen, A. Kantelinen, L. Viikari,
T. Lundell and A. J. Hatakka, Biotechnol., 1990, 13,
211–221.
2
P. Atanassov, C. Apblett, S. Banta, S. Brozik, S. C. Barton,
M. Cooney, B. Y. Liaw, S. Mukerjee and S. D. Minteer,
Interfaces, 2007, 16, 28–31.
3
4
S. C. Barton, J. Gallaway and P. Atanassov, Chem. Rev., 2004,
104, 4867–4886.
F. Barri ´e re, P. Kavanagh and D. Leech, Electrochim. Acta, 30 C. Gruian, E. Vanea, S. Simon and V. Simon, Biochim.
006, 51, 5187–5192. Biophys. Acta, Proteins Proteomics, 2012, 1824, 873–881.
2
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2014
New J. Chem., 2014, 38, 386--390 | 389