X. Wang et al.
1
Introduction
same Ru content prepared by a conventional impregnation
method. Additionally, it is expected that the dispersion
oꢀ RuO2 might be enhanced by decreasing the support-
crystal size, because the smaller the support-crystal size,
the higher the speciꢁc surꢀace area ꢀor carrying the active
species. However, the efects oꢀ the support-crystal size on
the catalytic properties oꢀ the Deacon catalyst RuO2/TiO2
have not been systematically investigated yet.
Chlorine is widely used as a reactive intermediate ꢀor man-
uꢀacturing industrial and consumer products, especially
polyurethane and polycarbonate. However, approximately
5
0% oꢀ the Cl produced worldwide ends up as HCl or
2
chloride salts [1]. The most representative example is the
production oꢀ toluene diisocyanate (TDI), in which 4 mol
oꢀ HCl are produced ꢀor each mole oꢀ TDI production
while the produced HCl is environmentally undesirable
and has a limited market. Consequently, it is attractive to
In this work, RuO2/TiO2 catalysts with diferent support-
crystal sizes were prepared and characterized with various
techniques in detail. These prepared catalysts were then eval-
uated in the Deacon process and the efects oꢀ the support-
crystal size on the catalytic properties oꢀ the resultant RuO2/
TiO2 in the HCl oxidation were systematically investigated.
The results show that the decrease oꢀ the support-crystal
size can be an efective method to enhance the dispersion
oꢀ RuO2 on TiO2, leading to a signiꢁcant increase in the
catalytic activity.
ꢁ
nd eꢂcient methods ꢀor converting the by-product HCl
in waste streams back into the reactive intermediate Cl .
2
The heterogeneously catalyzed gas-phase oxidation oꢀ
HCl by molecular oxygen to H O and Cl , the so-called
2
2
Deacon process, is a sustainable route to meet the world’s
growing demand ꢀor Cl and to recycle the by-product HCl
2
in the chlorine-related chemical industry [2, 3], showing
a lower energy consumption than that by an electro-cata-
lyzed chlorine evolution reaction. In the Deacon process,
it has been repeatedly demonstrated that supported RuO
2 Experimental
2
catalysts are efective because oꢀ their high activities at
low temperatures and resistance to bulk chlorination [4].
Both TiO (rutile) and SnO (cassiterite) have been iden-
2.1 Catalyst Preparation
2
2
tiꢁed as the best supports ꢀor preparing supported RuO
Based on the recipe and synthesis procedure reported in the
literature [22], the rutile-type TiO2 support with a crystal
size oꢀ ca. 2000 nm was prepared as ꢀollows, 0.6 g oꢀ TiCl4
was dissolved in 100 mL oꢀ HCl aqueous solution (3.5 M)
with stirring in an ice-water bath, ꢀollowed by adding 0.07 g
oꢀ NaF. The obtained reaction mixture was then hydrother-
mally crystallized at 493 K ꢀor 12 h and cooled to room tem-
perature. The product was washed with distilled water and
then dried at 373 K overnight. Finally, the dried sample was
calcined in static air at 773 K ꢀor 5 h with a heating rate oꢀ
2
Deacon catalysts, because RuO is deposited in the ꢀorm
2
oꢀ epitaxially grown structures as a result oꢀ lattice match-
ing, leading to an enhanced dispersion and stabilization
oꢀ the active phase, which is quite diferent ꢀrom other
supports, such as SiO , Al O , and TiO with an anatase-
2
2
3
2
type structure [5–10]. Additionally, rutile-TiO supported
2
RuO catalysts are also highly active in many other impor-
2
tant reactions, such as photocatalytic water splitting [11],
trichloroethylene oxidation [12], CO oxidation [13], dehy-
drogenation oꢀ NH [14] and CH OH [15], and electro-
−
1
5 K min , and the calcined sample was named TiO2-2000.
For comparison, two commercially available rutile-type
TiO2 samples with average crystal sizes oꢀ ca. 200 and
50 nm in diameter, purchased ꢀrom Shanghai Xushuo Bio-
technology Co., Ltd., were calcined under the same condi-
tions as those ꢀor the synthesized one to ensure their rutile-
type structures, and these calcined samples were named
TiO2-200 and TiO2-50, respectively.
3
3
catalysis [3]. Furthermore, a transient mechanistic study
has demonstrated that the surꢀace RuO Cl oxychloride
2
-x
x
ꢀ
ormed via the partial chlorination oꢀ the surꢀace Ru atoms
(
coordinatively unsaturated and bridge sites) is the active
phase, indicating that the catalytic perꢀormance oꢀ sup-
ported RuO catalysts is closely related to the amount
2
oꢀ the surꢀace Ru atoms [16–18]. Hence, it is attractive
to increase the percentage oꢀ the surꢀace Ru atoms by
The RuO2/TiO2 catalysts (nominal 2.0 wt% Ru with
diꢀꢀerent support-crystal sizes) were prepared by a dry
impregnation method as ꢀollows, 1.0 g oꢀ TiO2 support
was impregnated with 0.1 mL oꢀ RuCl3 aqueous solution
increasing the dispersion oꢀ RuO on the supports.
2
Strengthening the active phase-support interactions by
optimizing the synthesis parameters during the catalyst
preparation has been demonstrated as an efective way
−
1
(0.1 g mL ) at room temperature ꢀor 6 h. In addition, the
RuO2/TiO2-50 catalysts with nominal 1.5 and 2.5 wt% Ru
loadings were also prepared by the dry impregnation method
as ꢀollows: 1.0 g oꢀ TiO2-50 was impregnated with 0.1 mL oꢀ
RuCl3 aqueous solution (a RuCl3 concentration oꢀ 0.075 or
to increase the dispersion oꢀ RuO on the supports [8,
2
1
9–21]. Pérez-Ramírez et al. [21] have ꢀound that depos-
iting colloidally prepared Ru nanoparticles on a rutile
carrier results in catalysts attaining a higher activity in
the Deacon process, compared to the catalyst with the
−
1
0.125 g mL ) at room temperature ꢀor 6 h. Then the above-
obtained slurry was dried at 343 K ꢀor 12 h and calcined in
1
3