Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
1974 J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 111, No. 10, 2007
Opila et al.
TABLE 3: B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) Frequencies (cm-1) for
during the course of these experiments. The pressure measured
with the capacitance monitor was found to vary with ambient
conditions and was within 0.3% of a nearby barometric
standard.41 The temperature- and pressure-dependent experi-
ments were conducted with the total cell flow rates (argon,
oxygen, water vapor, volatile chromium species) between 7.55
and 17.04 mL/s at the experimental temperature. Inlet liquid
water flow rates were controlled with a peristaltic pump (Rainin,
Instrument Co., Woburn, MA) and varied between 0.33 and
6.80 mL/h. Water vapor contents in the cell varied between 4%
and 48% of the total flow. Inlet oxygen flow rates varied
between 50 and 471 sccm. Oxygen contents in the cell varied
between 13% and 100% of the total flow. Inlet argon flow rates
varied between 0 and 268 sccm. Gas flow rates were controlled
with calibrated mass flow controllers (Tylan General, Rancho
Dominguez, CA). Experiment times varied between 15 and 95
h.
Cr Analysis. Care was taken to analyze Cr from all of the
vapor products formed in the reaction cell. This involved careful
collection and analysis of the deposits in the condensation tubes
and the water in the collection burette shown in Figure 2. Several
types of deposits were found in the collection tubes: liquid
brown deposits and solid green deposits. The identification of
these deposits will be discussed in the results section. To collect
the deposited Cr for analysis, the fused quartz condensation
tubes were injected in succession with deionized water, con-
centrated HCl, and concentrated HF. Each solvent was left in
the tube for about 30 min before flushing with the next solvent.
After a final deionized water flush, all solvents were collected
in the same beaker, heated, and diluted to a known volume.
The brown and green deposits adhering to the inner walls of
the tubes were dislodged by attack of the HF on the fused quartz.
Heating the collected solvents dissolved the brown deposit but
not the green deposit. The green deposit was filtered off, and
the filter paper was transferred to a platinum crucible. The
residue was ignited in a muffle furnace at 923 K for 1 h, and
then fused in a mixture of 0.9 g anhydrous sodium carbonate
and 0.1 g sodium tetraborate at around 1073 K for 10-15 min.
When the melt was clear, the crucible was removed from heating
and the solidified melt dissolved in deionized water. The solution
was then acidified with concentrated HCl and diluted to a known
volume. The product of the fusion process was added to the
other washings.
a
CrO2(OH)2
O-Cr-O, OdCr-O,
OdCrdO bend
Cr-O
stretch
Cr-O-H
bend
CrdO
stretch
O-H
stretch
225(A), 269(A), 294(B), 734(A),
323(B), 406(A) 734(B)
763(A),
785(B)
1083(A),
1107(B)
3810(B),
3815(A)
a The symmetry of each mode is given in parentheses. In addition
to the modes included in the table, there were two modes, at 346(A)
and 367(B) cm-1, which were assigned as O-H internal rotations.
TABLE 4: Computation of ∆H° and ∆H°
for
f,0
f,298.15
CrO2(OH)2 from Reaction 5a
∆Ee[HF]
∂[MP2]
241.98
-2.87
-13.13
+0.83
+1.11
-8.45
+11.97
-9.61
∂[CCSD]
∂[CCSD(T)]
∂[core]
∂[basis]
∂[rel]
∂[ZPVE]
∆H°
221.83
-780.3
-791.8
r,0
∆Hf°,0 [CrO2(OH)2]
∆H°f,298.15 [CrO2(OH)2]
a All entries in kJ mol-1. ∆Ee[HF] is the reaction energy computed
at the Hartree-Fock level with the Bauschlicher ANO basis set on Cr
and the cc-pVTZ set on H and O. δ[MP2], δ[CCSD], and δ[CCSD(T)]
designate the changes in the reaction energy relative to the preceding
level of theory. δ[core], δ[basis], δ[rel], and δ[ZPVE] represent the
corrections to the reaction energy from core-correlation, basis set
improvement, scalar relativistic effects, and zero-point vibrational
energy. ∆H° [CrO2(OH)2] and ∆H°
[CrO2(OH)2] are computed
f,0
from ∆H°r,0 as described in the text. f,298.15
sides of the O-Cr-O plane with O-Cr-O-H dihedral angles
of -92.4°. The computed harmonic vibrational frequencies and
their assignments are given in Table 3. The B3LYP/6-311++G-
(d,p) structure and frequencies for CrO2(OH)2 are similar to
previously computed B3LYP values8 obtained with a triple-ú
basis set including diffuse functions and a single set of
polarization functions on H and O, although our Cr-O and Crd
O bond distances are 0.005-0.006 Å shorter, probably due
mainly to inclusion of polarization functions on Cr.
The computation of the heat of formation for CrO2(OH)2 from
reaction 5 is detailed in Table 4. The HF f MP2, MP2 f
CCSD, and CCSD f CCSD(T) increments in the reaction
energy are labeled δ[MP2], δ[CCSD], and δ[CCSD(T)],
respectively. The small size of these increments, and in particular
the δ[CCSD(T)] value of only 0.8 kJ mol-1, indicates rapid
convergence of the computed reaction energy with respect to
improving the treatment of electron correlation. These results
lend confidence in the adequacy of the CCSD(T) method, the
highest level of electron correlation employed, for computing
the reaction energy for reaction 5. The various corrections
applied to the computed CCSD(T) reaction energy, δ[core],
δ[basis], and δ[rel], assume values of 1.1, -8.5, and 12.0 kJ
mol-1. Our final ab initio values for the heat of formation for
The solutions described above, as well as the collected water,
were analyzed separately for total Cr by inductively coupled
plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) (Varian Vista
Pro Axial View Spectrometer, Varian, Inc.). The collected water
from each experiment was also analyzed for hexavalent Cr by
a spectrophotometric technique (Shimadzu Model UV-160
Ultraviolet-visible Spectrophotometer, Shimadzu Corp) using
1,5 diphenylcarbohydrazide. The 1,5 diphenylcarbohydrazide
reacts with Cr(VI) to develop a vivid pink-purple color that
allows the concentration to be determined by measuring the
absorbance at 540 nm. This technique verified that the Cr was
present in the hexavalent state and, in addition, provided
independent confirmation of ICP-AES accuracy.
CrO2(OH)2 are ∆H° (CrO2(OH)2) ) -780 ( 20 kJ mol-1 and
f,0
∆Hf°,298.15(CrO2(OH)2) ) -792 ( 20 kJ mol-1. The uncer-
tainty of (20 kJ mol-1 takes into account the reported
uncertainties in the employed experimental data and the
estimated residual errors in the computation of the reaction
energy for reaction 5. Our ∆H°f,298.15 value agrees well with the
value of -787 ( 36 kJ mol-1 computed previously by Espelid
et al.8 This may be somewhat fortuitous, however, because their
value was obtained by averaging two widely differing numbers
(-762 and -812 kJ mol-1) computed using variants of the G2
Theoretical Results and Discussion
The optimum B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) geometry for CrO2-
(OH)2 has C2 symmetry. The bond distances are r(CrdO) )
1.560 Å, r(Cr-O) ) 1.759 Å, and r(O-H) ) 0.967 Å. The
chromium-oxygen bond angles are OdCrdO ) 111.4°, O-
Cr-O ) 109.9°, and O-CrdO ) 110.0°, 107.8°. The Cr-
O-H angle is 116.4°, and the two O-H bonds lie on opposite