several days at room temperature. Dark green needle crystals of 2
of good quality were formed, and these were separated by filtration
and washed with cold ethanol. Yield 1.90 g (66.4%). Anal. calcd.
for C11H15CuNO6 (320.78): C 41.19, H 4.71, N 4.37, Cu 19.81.
Found C 40.90, H 4.50, N 4.76, Cu 20.11%. IR(KBr) n = 3444
(OH, coord. water), 3042, 2959, 1627 (C N), 1540 (COO-as.),
1350 (COO-sym), 1205, 769, 606, 470, 410 cm-1. UV/Vis (DMSO,
c = 4 ¥ 10-3 mol dm-3) lmax = 667 (loge = 1.28), 352 (loge = 2.48) nm.
of the complexes. The powdered sample (0.1 g) was dissolved in
10 mL of distilled water in a 250 mL glass beaker. Afterwards,
3 mL of conc. H2SO4 and distilled water up to 100 mL was added
before electrolysis. A Pt-electrode was employed as a cathode for
copper removal for 15–30 min (coating on the cathode indicate the
progress of the electrolysis) at 2 V and 2–3 A. The copper content
was calculated from the mass difference on the electrode before
and after electrolysis.32
Measurements of antiradical activity
[Cu(SGABA) (H2O)2] (3)
The antiradical activity of the copper(II) complexes was deter-
mined following the method used by Valentova´ et al.7,26 The
reaction solution consisted of 0.5 mL of 4 ¥ 10-3 mol dm-3 INT in
borate buffer (pH = 7.1) and 150 mL of a 4 ¥ 10-3 mol dm-3 solution
of the tested compound in 10% DMSO. The addition of 150 mL
of a saturated potassium superoxide solution in DMSO to the
reaction system started the radical reaction. The blue-formazane
product was analysed spectroscopically (absorbance at 560 nm)
on a BioTekSynergy HT instrument.
To a water/i-propylalcohol solution (1 : 1, 60 mL) of H2SGABA
(10 mmol), an aqueous solution of copper acetate dihydrate
(10 mmol in 60 mL) was added and stirred for 1 h at room
temperature accompanied with a colour change to dark green.
The resultant reaction mixture was filtered off and the filtrate
was left to crystallise spontaneously for several days at room
temperature. Dark green needle-shaped crystals of 3 of good
quality were formed, and these were separated by filtration and
washed with cold i-propylalcohol. Yield 1.85 g (64.5%). Anal.
calcd. for C11H13CuNO4 (286.76): C 46.07, H 4.57, N 4.88, Cu
22.16. Found C 46.37, H 4.45, N 4.70, Cu 22.54%. IR(KBr)
n = 3442 (OH, coord. water), 3030, 2917, 1635 (C N), 1540
(COO-as.), 1352 (COO-sym), 1210, 752, 557, 459, 415 cm-1. UV/Vis
(DMSO, c = 4 ¥ 10-3 mol dm-3) lmax = 682 (loge = 1.48), 352 (loge =
2.60), 282 nm.
Acknowledgements
Grant agencies are acknowledged for their financial sup-
port: VEGA Grant Agency of Slovak Ministry of Education
1/0266/10, 1/0229/10, 1/0817/10; Research and Development
Agency (Slovakia) APVV-0093-07. ZP thanks the Grant project
of the Pharmaceutical Faculty FaF UK-16/2010. We thank
the Structural Funds, Interreg IIIA, for financial support in
purchasing the diffractometer.
Structure determination
The X-ray structural determinations of the compounds 1–3
were carried out on a Gemini R CCD difractometer (Oxford
Diffraction XcaliburTM). The diffraction data were collected at
293 K by the standard method (graphite monochromatized Mo-
References
˚
Ka radiation, l = 0.71073 A). The strategy for data collection
1 (a) R. H. Holm and E. I. Solomon, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 347; (b) J.
E. Weder, C. T. Dillon, T. W. Hambley, B. J. Kennedy, P. A. Lay, J. R.
Biffin, H. L. Regtop and N. M. Davies, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2002, 232,
95.
was: 30 omega multi-scan, 30 s exposition time for compound
1; 14 omega multi-scan and 16 s exposition time for compound
2; 15 omega multi-scan and 90 s exposition time for compound
3. Data reduction and empirical absorption corrections were
performed by the CrysAlisRed program.28 The structures were
solved by direct methods and refined by the full-matrix least-
squares procedure with SHELXS97 and SHELXL97 program
package.29 Analytical absorption correction was applied using
a multifaceted crystal model based on expressions derived by
Clark and Reid.30 Visualization of the structures was performed
using DIAMOND.31 Crystallographic and experimental details
are given in Table 2, selected bond lengths and angles are presented
in Table 3, Table 4 summarizes the hydrogen bond lengths and
angles. Crystallographic data for the structures reported in this
paper can be found in the ESI.†
ˇ
2 (a) L. Andreza´lova´, Z. Duracˇkova´, A. Valent and F. Dev´ınsky,
Pharmazie, 1998, 53, 338; (b) J. Vancˇo, J. Marek, Z. Tra´vn´ıcˇek, E.
Racˇanska´, J. Musel´ık and J. Valentova´, J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol.,
2004, 18, 155.
3 (a) J. A. Trainer, E. Getzoff, J. S. Richardson and D. C. Richardson,
Nature, 1983, 306, 284; (b) M. A. Hough and S. S. Hasnain, Structure,
2003, 11, 937.
4 (a) I. Fridovich, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 1995, 64, 97; (b) I. Bertini, S.
Mangani and M. Viezzoli, Adv. Inorg. Chem., 1998, 45, 127; (c) S. I.
Liochev and I. Fridovich, Free Radical Biol. Med., 2010, 48, 1565.
5 (a) P. A. Vigato and S. Tamburini, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2004, 248, 1717;
(b) B. Sreenivasulu, M. Vetrichelvan, F. Zhao, S. Gao and J. J. Vittal,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2005, 4635.
ˇ
ˇ
ˇ
6 (a) L. Bergendi, J. Kra¨tsma´r-Smogrovicˇ, Z. Duracˇkova´ and I.
ˇ
Zitnˇanova´, Free Radical Res., 1991, 12, 195; (b) G. Plesch, C. Friebel,
O. Svajlenova´ and J. Kra¨tsma´r-Smogrovicˇ, Polyhedron, 1995, 14, 1185;
(c) C. Friebel, G. Plesch, V. Kettmann, J. Kra¨tsma´r-Smogrovicˇ and O.
ˇ
ˇ
ˇ
ˇ
Svajlenova´, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1997, 254, 443.
Physical measurements
ˇ
ˇ
7 (a) J. Valentova´, M. Zemlicˇka, E. Svajdlenka, F. Dev´ınsky, “The SOD-
mimic activity measurements of copper(II) chelates of Schiff bases using
HPLC method. Curr. Trends Coord. Chem. 1993 (G. Ondrejovicˇ, A.
Sirota, ed.), Slovak Technical University Press, 441; (b) S. L. Henke,
“Superoxide dismutase mimics as future therapeutics, Expert Opinion
IR spectra were measured as KBr pellets (Schimadzu Impact
400) in the 4000–400 cm-1 region. Electronic spectra of water
and DMSO solutions of compounds (c = 3.10-4 mol dm-3)
were measured in the 200–800 nm region (Schimadzu UV-160).
Elemental analysis was performed by the Department of Inorganic
Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak
Technical University (FlashEA 1112, ThermoFinnigan). The
copper content was determined by electrolysis after mineralization
on Therapeutic Patents 1999, 9, 169; (c) Z. Puterova´, Acta Facult. Pharm.
Univ. Comenianae, 2009, LVI, 16; (d) Y. Li, Z. Yang and B. Wang,
Transition Met. Chem., 2006, 31, 598.
ˇ
ˇ
8 (a) J. Valentova´, I. Gombosˇova´, M. Zemlicˇka, V. Laginova´ and P. Svec,
ˇ
Pharmazie, 1995, 50, 442; (b) A. Valent, M. Kohu´tova´, O. Svajlenova´,
D. Hudecova´, P. Olejn´ıkova´ and M. Meln´ık, J. Coord. Chem., 2004,
Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 1484–1490 | 1489
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
©