R. Gandolfi et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 13 (2002) 2345–2349
2349
Biotransformations were completed using bacteria
grown directly inside the reaction vessel; in experiments
with two-liquid phase systems, solvents were added to
reach a 1:1 v/v ratio. Neat substrate was directly added
to suspensions. Control of the pH was performed by
continuous addition of aqueous NaOH via a multi-
channel Watson–Marlow 503 U/R peristaltic pump
connected to a pH controller (pH/ORP Controller
chloride solution. The reaction was discontinued if the
yield of the acid was less than 15% after 24 h.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the C.N.R. Target Project
on Biotechnology (n 97.01019. PF 115.08601). We
thank Wacker-Chemie GmbH for the generous gift of
cyclodextrins.
3
675, Jenco Electronics). The work-up of these bio-
transformation was carried according to Ref. 4.
4.3. Analytical methods
The absolute configuration of the obtained acid was
determined by comparison with the specific rotation of
authentic samples of the enantiomerically pure com-
pounds. Samples (0.5 ml) were taken at intervals
brought to pH 1 by addition of 5 M HCl and extracted
References
1. Asai, T. Acetic Acid Bacteria; University of Tokyo Press:
Tokyo, 1968.
2. Adlercreutz, P. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1989, 30, 257.
3. Geerlof, A.; Jongejan, J. A.; Van Dooren, T. J. M.;
Petronella, C. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1994, 16, 1059–
1063.
with an equal volume of Et O. Phenylpropanoic acid
2
concentrations and enantiomeric composition were rou-
®
tinely determined by HPLC using a Chiralcel OD
(
Daicel Chemical Industries, Illkirch, France) analytical
4. Molinari, F.; Villa, R.; Aragozzini, F.; L e` on, R.; Praz-
eres, D. M. F. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 3003–
3009.
5. Romano, A.; Gandolfi, R.; Nitti, P.; Rollini, M.; Moli-
nari, F. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2002, 17, 235–240.
6. Angelova, B.; Schmauder, H.-P. J. Biotechnol. 1999, 67,
13–32.
column. The stereochemical outcome of the transfor-
mations was expressed as enantiomeric excess (e.e.) of
the major enantiomer or as enantiomeric ratio (E). The
upper threshold for the numerical value of E is 200,
since higher values of
determined.
E cannot be accurately
7. Van Sonsbeck, H. M.; Beeftink, H. H.; Tramper, J.
Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1993, 15, 723–729.
4
.4. Immobilization procedures
8. Mahato, S. B.; Garai, S. Steroids 1997, 62, 332–345.
The cell culture medium was centrifuged at 4000 g for
5 min at 4°C and the biomass was separated from the
liquid. The cells were mixed with sterilized sodium
alginate (20 ml, 2.0% solution) (Sigma Chemicals) and
the mixture was dropped into calcium chloride solution
9. Leon, R.; Fernandes, P.; Pinheiro, H. M.; Cabral, J. M.
S. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1998, 23, 483–500.
10. Uden, W.; Van Woerdenbag, H. J.; Pras, N. Plant Cell
Tissue Organ Cult. 1994, 38, 103–113.
1
11. Shieh, W. R.; Gopalan, A. S.; Sih, C. J. J. Am. Chem.
(
0.1 M, 50 ml) introduced in an ice bath using a
Soc. 1985, 107, 2993–2999.
hypodermic syringe. After hardening for 1 h, the
12. Chen, C. S.; Zhou, B. N.; Girdaukas, G.; Shieh, W. R.;
Van Middlesworth, F.; Gopalan, A. S.; Sih, C. J. Bioorg.
Chem. 1984, 12, 98–107.
13. D’Arrigo, P.; Pedrocchi Fantoni, G.; Servi, S.; Strini, A.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 2375–2379.
14. Molinari, F.; Occhiato, E. G.; Aragozzini, F.; Guarna, A.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 1389–1394.
15. Smidsr o¨ nd, O.; Skjak-Braek, G. Trends Biotechnol. 1990,
8, 71–78.
obtained beads were rinsed with aqueous CaCl solu-
2
tion (0.1 M, 50 ml), separated by filtration and the wet
beads were stored at 4°C until use. Both free and
immobilized cells were re-used in successive cycles.
After 24 h, free cells were centrifuged and re-suspended
in fresh reaction mixture and 2-phenylethanol (2.5 g/l)
was added. Immobilized cells were filtered on paper and
re-used after washing with a 0.1 M aqueous calcium