ARTICLE IN PRESS
D. Logvinovich et al. / Journal of Solid State Chemistry 181 (2008) 2243–2249
2249
CaO and Mo
formed as a minor phase during the ammonolysis of BaMoO
which yields mainly in Ba Mo . Thus, the crystal structure of
the starting precursor is crucial for the desired phase formation.
As the other factors influencing the phase formation during the
2
N when reacted with ammonia. BaMo(O,N)
3
is
References
4
,
O
6
N
2
[1] W.E. Newton, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 317 (1987) 259–277.
3
2
[
2] D. McKay, J.S.J. Hargreaves, J.L. Rico, J.L. Rivera, X.L. Sun, J. Solid State Chem.
81 (2008) 325–333.
3] L. Le Gendre, R. Marchand, Y. Laurent, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 17 (1997) 1813–1818.
1
[
ammonolysis of AMoO
3
and AMoO
4
the gas to solid ratio, positive
[4] R. Marchand, Y. Laurent, J. Guyader, P. L’Haridon, P. Verdier, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.
(1991) 197–213.
8
inductive effect of the A-site cation, the lattice energy, the
structure distortion energy and Mo–N bonding covalence were
considered.
[
[
5] F. Tessier, R. Marchand, J. Solid State Chem. 171 (2000) 143–151.
6] A. Rachel, S.G. Ebbinghaus, M. Gungerich, P.J. Klar, J. Hanss, A. Weidenkaff, A.
Reller, Thermochim. Acta 438 (2005) 134–143.
[
[
7] R. Marchand, F. Pors, Y. Laurent, Ann. Chim. Fr. 16 (1991) 553–560.
8] P. Antoine, R. Marchand, Y. Laurent, C. Michel, B. Raveau, Mater. Res. Bull. 23
CaMo(O,N)
3
crystallizes in space group Pbnm and possesses a
. ND reveals a
less distorted crystal structure than CaMoO
statistical distribution of O and N among the available anionic
sites and an anionic content corresponding to the composition
3
(1988) 953–957.
2
ꢀ
3ꢀ
[9] I.D. Fawcett, K.V. Ramanujachary, M. Greenblatt, Mater. Res. Bull. 32 (1997)
1565–1570.
10] P. Maillard, F. Tessier, E. Orhan, F. Chevire, R. Marchand, Chem. Mater. 17
[
[
1.3(1)
CaMoO1.7(1)N .
(2005) 152–156.
TEM shows evidence for twin domains in both CaMoO
3
and
11] G. Liu, X. Zhao, H.A. Eick, J. Alloys Compd. 187 (1992) 145–156.
CaMoO1.7(1)
N
1.3(1), which together with the average crystallite size
[12] D. Logvinovich, R. Aguiar, R. Robert, M. Trottmann, S.G. Ebbinghaus, A. Reller,
A. Weidenkaff, J. Solid State Chem. 180 (2007) 2649–2654.
may be responsible for the line profile broadening in the XRPD
patterns. The multiplicity of different twin types measured for
[
[
13] K. Kamata, T. Nakamura, T. Sata, Chem. Lett. 4 (1975) 81–86.
14] C. de la Calle, J.A. Alonso, M. Garcia-Hernandez, V. Pomjakushin, J. Solid State
Chem. 179 (2006) 1636–1641.
3
CaMoO1.7(1)N1.3(1) compared to CaMoO can be explained on the
[
[
[
15] L.H. Brixner, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 14 (1960) 225–230.
16] K. Kamata, T. Nakamura, T. Sata, Mater. Res. Bull. 10 (1975) 373–378.
17] Z. Singh, S. Dash, R. Prasad, D.D. Sood, J. Alloys Compd. 215 (1994) 303–307.
one hand by the smaller mismatch between a and c lattice
constants in the former compound or on the other hand by the
different thermal history of the compounds.
[18] D. Logvinovich, A. Borger, M. Dobeli, S.G. Ebbinghaus, A. Reller, A. Weidenkaff,
Prog. Solid State Chem. 35 (2007) 281–290.
BaMo(O,N)
completely disordered O/N arrangement as found for Ca-
1.3(1). Its determined lattice parameter and conse-
quently both Mo–O/N and Ba–O/N distances are larger than
those of the corresponding BaMoO as revealed by X-ray
diffraction. This finding is attributed to the larger ionic radius of
3
adopts the space group Pm 3¯ m. This indicates a
[
[
19] P. Thompson, D.E. Cox, J.B. Hastings, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 20 (1987) 79–83.
20] B. van Laar, W.B. Yelon, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 17 (1984) 47–54.
MoO1.7(1)
N
[21] L.W. Finger, D.E. Cox, A.P. Jephcoat, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 27 (1994) 892–900.
[
[
22] J. Rodriguez-Carvajal, T. Roisnel, Mater. Sci. Forum 443–444 (2004) 123–126.
23] P. Fischer, G. Frey, M. Koch, M. Konnecke, V. Pomjakushin, J. Schefer, R. Thut,
N. Schlumpf, R. Burge, U. Greuter, Physica B 276–278 (2000) 146–147.
3
[24] J. Rodriguez-Carvajal, Physica B 192 (1993) 55–69.
[25] P.A. Stadelmann, Ultramicroscopy 21 (1987) 131–145.
3
ꢀ
2ꢀ
N
compared to that of O
.
[
[
26] M.T. Weller, S.J. Skinner, Int. J. Inorg. Mater. 2 (2000) 463–467.
27] P. Subramanya Herle, M.S. Hegde, G.N. Subbanna, J. Mater. Chem. 7 (1997)
Thus, as future work, studies on thermal reoxidation and
catalytic properties of the synthesized phases are planned.
2
121–2125.
28] P. Ettmayer, Monatshefte Chem./Chem. Monthly 101 (1970) 127–140.
29] S.H. Elder, F.J. DiSalvo, L. Topor, A. Navrotsky, Chem. Mater.
545–1553.
30] S.J. Clarke, K.A. Hardstone, C.W. Michie, M.J. Rosseinsky, Chem. Mater. 14
2002) 2664–2669.
[31] J. Etourneau, J. Portier, F. Menil, J. Alloys Compd. 188 (1992) 1–7.
[
[
5
(1993)
1
Acknowledgments
[
(
The authors acknowledge the German Science Foundation
[
[
[
32] R.D. Shannon, C.T. Prewitt, Acta Crystallogr. B 25 (1969) 925–946.
33] R. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr. A 32 (1976) 751–767.
34] Y. Wang, R.C. Liebermann, Phys. Chem. Miner. 20 (1993) 147–158.
(DFG-SPP 1136) and Empa for the financial support and Dr. Denis
Sheptyakov (SINQ, Paul Scherrer Institute) for the technical
assistance. This work is partly based on the experiments
performed at the Swiss Spallation Neutron Source SINQ, Paul
Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
[35] H. Nakano, M. Kobayashi, N. Kamegashira, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90 (2007)
276–1279.
36] A. Weidenkaff, M.H. Aguirre, T. Lippert, U. Falke, U. Bangert, Chimia 60 (2006)
42–748.
37] M.H. Aguirre, R. Robert, D. Logvinovich, A. Weidenkaff, Inorg. Chem. 46 (2007)
744–2750.
[38] C.L. Bull, P.F. McMillan, E. Soignard, K. Leinenweber, J. Solid State Chem. 177
2004) 1488–1492.
1
[
[
7
2
Appendix A. Supplementary Materials
(
[39] T. Kawashima, E. Takayama-Muromachi, P.F. McMillan, Physica C 460–462
(2007) 651–652.