4
12
N.-C. Lai et al. / Journal of Catalysis 365 (2018) 411–419
size of copper is the most crucial factor in high catalytic activity for
the reaction. In addition to the size effect, the surface properties of
the support may also affect the catalytic performance of the sup-
ported catalysts. For example, Fukuoka et al. found a promotional
effect of the surface silanol groups in the preferential oxidation
of carbon monoxide catalyzed by platinum nanoparticles sup-
ported on mesoporous FSM-16 silica [44]. Nevertheless, for sup-
ported copper catalysts, the possible influence of the surface
properties of the support on their catalytic performance has sel-
dom been discovered and studied.
(ICP-MS) data were obtained using a Perkin–Elmer SCIEX-ELAN
5000 device. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns were
obtained on a Mac Science 18MPX diffractometer using CuK
a radi-
ation. N physisorption isotherms were measured at 77 K using a
2
Quantachrome Autosorb-1-MP instrument. The desorption
branches were analyzed by the density functional theory (DFT)
method to evaluate pore sizes, and the adsorption branches in
the relative pressure range 0.05–0.30 were used to calculate sur-
face areas by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. Pore vol-
umes were evaluated at a relative pressure of 0.95. Solid-state 29Si
MAS NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker AVANCE III spec-
trometer using a 4-mm MAS probe. SEM images were obtained
with a field emission JEOL JSM-7000F microscope operating at
10 kV and equipped with an energy dispersion X-ray (EDX) spec-
trometer. The samples were coated with Pt before measurements
were performed. TEM images were taken using a JEOL JEM-2010
microscope operated at 200 kV and equipped with an EDX spec-
trometer. Diffuse reflectance UV–visible absorption spectra were
recorded on a JASCO V-650 spectrophotometer equipped with a
diffuse reflectance accessory.
Here we report a direct synthesis of MCM-41-type mesoporous
silica nanoparticle (MSN)-supported nanosized copper catalysts
and catalytic studies on the selective oxidation of propylene with
2
O . The synthesis was based on the ‘‘pH-jump” synthesis of meso-
porous MCM-41 silica [45], with the ammonia complex of Cu(II) as
the metal precursor. The addition of ethyl acetate (EA) caused a
drastic drop in solution pH and simultaneously initiated the coop-
erative self-assembly of ordered mesophases and the condensation
of silicates, as well as the deposition of copper oxide species. The
copper oxide species in the resulting materials (abbreviated as
CuMSN) were subsequently transformed to nanosized metallic
copper by hydrogen reduction. We found that the reduced CuMSN
exhibited superior catalytic activity and stability for the selective
2.3. Hydrogen temperature-programmed reduction
2
oxidation of propylene with O to produce acrolein, and that the
2
Hydrogen temperature-programmed reduction (H TPR) was
silanol groups on the silica surface of CuMSN facilitated
the adsorption of propylene, thereby enhancing the conversion of
the reactant. The acrolein yield for the best CuMSN was almost four
times the value for the state-of-the-art SBA-15-supported copper
catalyst under relatively mild reaction conditions [15]. Techniques
including hydrogen temperature-programmed reduction, in situ
X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and in situ diffuse reflectance infra-
red Fourier transform spectroscopy were employed to identify the
promotional effect in the CuMSN-catalyzed oxidation of propylene
performed at atmospheric pressure in a conventional flow system.
A sample (40 mg) was placed in a tubular reactor and heated at a
ꢀ1
rate of 10 °C min in a mixed gas stream (10% H
2
2
and 90% N ) with
ꢀ1
a flow rate of 30 mL min . The K- and P-values for the measure-
ments were 55–140 s and 5–20 K, respectively [46,47]. A cold trap
that contained a gel formed by the addition of liquid nitrogen to
acetone in a Thermos flask was used to prevent water from enter-
ing the thermal conductivity detector.
2
by O .
2.4. Estimation of surface area and dispersion of metallic copper
2
. Experimental
The surface area and the dispersion of metallic copper in the
reduced CuMSN catalysts were estimated by a method combining
2.1. Materials preparation
H2 TPR and N O oxidation [15,30]. The freshly prepared catalyst
2
2
was first analyzed by H TPR to calculate the total number of cop-
The preparation of CuMSN was based on the ‘‘pH-jump” synthe-
per atoms in that catalyst. After H2 TPR, the reduced catalyst was
sis of pure silica MSNs [45]. The solution containing cetyltrimethy-
lammonium bromide (1.14 g, Acros), sodium metasilicate (2.02 g,
J.T. Baker), and water (675 mL) was mixed well with a calculated
amount of the stock solution of the ammonia complex of Cu(II)
cooled to 80 °C under N , and the atmosphere was then switched
2
to 10% N O/N for 30 s to oxidize the surface atoms of the metallic
2
2
copper nanoparticles to Cu (I) according to the reaction 2Cu(s)
+
N O ? Cu O + N2(g). The thus-produced Cu O monolayer was
2
(g)
2
(s)
2
(
prepared by adding ammonia solution (50 mL, 3.0 M) into an
aqueous solution (50 mL, 0.1 M) of copper nitrate (Showa)). EA
9.76 mL, Alfa) was then quickly added to the mixture, which
quantified by H2 TPR and the amount of H2 consumed was used
to calculate the surface area of copper by assuming an average sur-
1
9
ꢀ2
(
face density for the metal of 1.4 ꢁ 10 atoms m [15,30]. The dis-
persion of copper was calculated from the number of surface
copper atoms and the total copper content of the catalyst. The data
were also used to estimate the average particle size of copper
nanoparticles in the reduced catalyst by assuming a spherical par-
ticle shape. The equations to calculate surface area (SCu), dispersion
(DCu), and average particle size (dCu) of copper nanoparticles are
was vigorously stirred for 30 s, then kept static at 35 °C for 24 h,
and finally aged at 90 °C for 24 h. The surfactant molecules in the
as-synthesized samples were removed by calcination at 540 °C or
by repeated solvent extraction (with an ethanol solution of ammo-
nium nitrate (0.025 M) at 50 °C for 15 min for three times). The cal-
cined and solvent-extracted samples with varied copper-to-silicon
(
Cu/Si) ratios of x% are denoted as xCuMSN-C and xCuMSN-E,
À
Á
2
19
respectively.
S
Cu in m =gCu ¼ ð2 ꢁ Y ꢁ NavÞ=ðX ꢁ MCu ꢁ 1:47 ꢁ 10
ꢂ 1353 ꢁ Y=X;
Þ
A reference sample with Cu/Si of 3% was prepared by impregna-
tion of the calcined pure silica material (i.e., 0CuMSN-C) with an
aqueous solution of copper nitrate followed by calcination at
D
Cu ðin %Þ ¼ ð2 ꢁ Y=XÞ ꢁ 100%;
5
40 °C. The reference sample is denoted as 3CuMSN-IC.
dCu ðin nmÞ ¼ 6=ðS ꢁ qCuÞ;
2.2. Materials characterization
where X is the H
in the catalyst, Y is the H
2
2
consumption for complete reduction of the copper
consumption for the reduction of surface
Cu(I) species (formed by N O oxidation), Nav is Avogadro’s constant
(6.02 ꢁ 10 mol ), MCu is the relative atomic mass of copper
Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements were conducted
on a particle size analyzer (Brookhaven Instruments Corporation,
Holtsville, NY). Inductively coupled plasma–mass spectroscopy
2
2
3
ꢀ1