R,â unsaturated acyl azides,7,8 palladium(II)-catalyzed ami-
optimization using this catalyst. Using benzamide and (E)-
1-iodoheptene as model substrates, we performed parallel
syntheses on the Quest 210 Organic Synthesizer (Argonaut
9
10
dation of alkenes, direct addition of amides to alkynes,
acylation of imines,1 acid-catalyzed condensation of alde-
1
hydes and amides,12 amide Peterson olefination, and
13
Technologies) as shown in Table 1. These studies estab-
19
14
Horner-Wittig and Wadsworth-Emmons reactions. How-
ever, most of these methods are either unable to control E-Z
olefin stereoselectivity or often suffer from low yields, and
thus may not be suitable for use at a late stage in a synthesis.
In considering potential methods for the formation of
enamides, we have focused our initial efforts on transition
metal-catalyzed vinylic substitution reactions of vinyl iodides
and amides. Ogawa et al. have reported the copper iodide-
promoted substitution of vinyl bromides and potassium
amides (1 equiv of CuI, HMPA, 130 °C) to afford enamides
in low to moderate (38-45%) yields.15 On the basis of this
precedent, and reports of related copper-catalyzed substitution
Table 1. Parallel Evaluation of Bases and Solvents
16
reactions, our initial goal was to develop a copper-catalyzed
method that would occur at milder temperatures and be
suitable for the installation of potentially labile enamides.
Initial screening of catalyst systems compared phosphine
17
copper(I) and copper(I) carboxylate catalysts using cesium
16
2 3
carbonate (Cs CO ) as base (Scheme 1). Enhanced conver-
b
lished the requirement for polar aprotic solvents in the
reaction (NMP or DMSO) and a slight enhancement when
sions were obtained using Liebeskind’s copper(I) thiophen-
ecarboxylate (CuTC) which led us to pursue further reaction
18
using Cs
2 3 2 3
CO vs K CO as base. Further improvement to
>
95% conversion was found using 30 mol % of CuTC and
(
7) For a recent synthesis of the heptadienamide side chain of salicyli-
halamide A and apicularens A and B, see: Snider, B. B.; Song, F. Org.
Lett. 2000, 2, 407.
rigorous vacuum purge degassing of the reaction mixture
prior to heating (90 °C, 12 h). Using these conditions, a
number of enamides were synthesized as shown in Table
(
8) Brettle, R.; Mosedale, A. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1. 1988,
185.
9) Hosokawa, T.; Takano, M.; Kuroki, Y.; Murahashi, S.-I. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1992, 33, 6643.
10) (a) Mohre, H.; Kilian, R. Tetrahedron 1969, 25, 5745. (b) Kondo,
T.; Tanaka, A.; Kotachi, S.; Watanabe, Y. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
995, 413.
11) (a) Boeckmann, R. K., Jr.; Goldstein, S. W.; Walters, M. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 8250.
12) (a) Zeeza, C. A.; Smith, M. B. Synth. Comm. 1987, 17, 729-40.
b) Kiefel, M. J.; Maddock, J.; Pattenden, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33,
2
2
0
(
2. Both styrenyl and alkenyl iodides are workable in the
reaction and generally afford isolated yields of enamides in
(
1
(19) http://www.argotech.com/quest (March 27, 2000).
(
(20) Typical experimental procedure (Table 2, entry 2): Sorbamide
(83 mg, 0.75 mmol), CuTC (28.6 mg 0.15 mmol), and Cs2CO3 (245 mg,
0.75 mmol) were placed in an oven-dried 10 mL Schlenk flask equipped
with a stir bar. Anhydrous NMP (2 mL) was added using a dry syringe.
The suspension was degassed with high vacuum until gas evolution ceased.
(E)-1-Iodoheptene (112 mg, 0.5 mmol, 79 µL) was added using a microliter
syringe. The mixture was degassed again using high vacuum until no further
gas evolution was observed. The suspension was stirred at 90 °C for 12 h
under argon. The red slurry was cooled to room temperature and diluted
with ether, and the ether extracts were washed with pH 7 buffer. The aqueous
layer was extracted 2x further with ether. The organic layers were combined,
dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate, and concentrated. The pure enamide
3b was obtained as a white solid (71 mg, 69% yield) after flash
chromatography on silica gel (hexane:ethyl acetate ) 4:1, 1% Et3N): mp
(
(
3
227.
(13) (a) Cuevas, J.-C.; Patil, P.; Snieckus, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989,
3
0, 5841. (b) Palomo, C.; Aizpurua, J. M.; Legido, M.; Picard, J. P.;
Dunogues, J.; Constantieux, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 3903.
14) (a) Couture, A.; Deniau, E.; Grandclaudon, P. Tetrahedron Lett.
(
1
2
993, 34, 1479. (b) Paterson, I.; Cowden, C.; Watson, C. Synlett 1995,
09.
(15) Ogawa, T.; Kiji, T.; Hayami, K.; Suzuki, H. Chem. Lett. 1991, 1443.
16) (a) Marcoux, J.-F.; Doye, S.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(
1
997, 119, 10539. (b) Kiyomori, A.; Marcoux, J.-F.; Doye, S.; Buchwald,
S. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2657. (c) Kalanin, A. V.; Bower, J. F.;
Riebel, P.; Snieckus, V. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 2986.
1
116-117 °C; H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.23 (1H, dd, J ) 14.8, 10
Hz), 7.16 (1H, d, J ) 9.6 Hz), 6.82 (1H, dd, J ) 14, 10.8 Hz), 6.12 (2H,
m), 5.71 (1H, d, J ) 14.8 Hz), 5.16 (1H, dt, J ) 14, 7.2 Hz), 1.82 (3H, d,
(
17) Okuro, K.; Furuune, M.; Enna, M.; Miura, M.; Nomura, M. J. Org.
Chem. 1993, 58, 4716.
18) (a) Allred, G. D.; Liebeskind, L. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
1
3
J ) 5.6 Hz), 1.30 (6H, m), 2.01 (2H, m), 0.86 (3H, t, J ) 6 Hz) ppm;
C
(
NMR (CDCl3, 67.5 MHz) δ 163.1, 142.4, 138.6, 129.7, 122.6, 120.7, 113.6,
2
2
748. (b) Zhang, S.; Zhang, D.; Liebeskind, L. S. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
312.
31.3, 29.7, 29.5, 22.5, 18.6, 14.0 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd 207.1623, found
-
1
207.1588; IR (neat) 3247, 2921, 1654, 1629, 1534, 1350 cm
.
1334
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 9, 2000