Protamine Doses After Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Svenarud
partial thromboplastin time.13 Other studies have shown
that protamine has a significant effect as an anticoagulant,
but only in nonclinical doses, usually 3 to 5 times the
dose normally used to neutralize heparin after CPB.14,15
This fact indicates that protamine has a large therapeutic
window. In this context, it should be noted that the quality
of different protamine and heparin preparations is not
consistent as the in vitro doses of protamine needed to
neutralize heparin are not the same as those shown in
vivo.16 This may also be due to different rates of heparin
metabolism.3,17 Patients’ response to heparin varies
considerably, depending on various factors such as the
body surface, sex, age, and antithrombin III concentration.
REFERENCES
1. Jobes DR, Schwartz AJ, Ellison N, Andrews R, Ruffini
RA, Ruffini JJ. Monitoring heparin anticoagulation and its
neutralization. Ann Thorac Surg 1981;31:161–6.
2. Bull BS, Korpman RA, Huse WM, Briggs BD. Heparin
therapy during extracorporeal circulation. I. Problems
inherent in existing heparin protocols. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg 1975;69:674–84.
3. Bull BS, Huse WM, Brauer FS, Korpman RA. Heparin
therapy during extracorporeal circulation. II. The use of
a dose-response curve to individualize heparin and
protamine dosage. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1975;69:
685–9.
4. Despotis GJ, Joist JH, Hogue CW Jr, Alsoufiev A, Kater
K, Goodnough LT, et al. The impact of heparin
concentration and activated clotting time monitoring on
blood conservation: a prospective, randomized evaluation
in patients undergoing cardiac operation. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:46–54.
In the last 20 years, 4 of the 5 published studies that
investigated the effect of a reduced protamine dose on
postoperative blood loss or on the need for transfusion
showed no benefits of a reduced dose,1,7,8,18 while one
did.19
5. Øvrum E, Åm Holen E, Tangen G. Consistent non-
pharmacologic blood conservation in primary and
reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardio-
thorac Surg 1995;9:30–5.
Keeler and associates8 compared a protamine titration
method with an empirical dose protocol for heparinization
reversal after CPB in 40 patients. All patients received
3 mg·kg–1 heparin, and additional heparin was given as
necessary during CPB to maintain the ACT above 400
seconds. The titration group received 2.1 to 7.4 mg·kg–1
compared with 5.3 to 9.3 mg·kg–1 in the empirical group.
Despite a significant reduction in the total protamine dose
in the titration group, postoperative bleeding did not
decrease.
6. Flom-Halvorsen HI, Øvrum E, Tangen G, Brosstad F,
Ringdal MAL, Øystese R. Autotransfusion in coronary
artery bypass grafting: disparity in laboratory tests and
clinical performance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;
118:610–7.
7. Shore-Lesserson L, Reich DL, DePerio M. Heparin and
protamine titration do not improve haemostasis in cardiac
surgical patients. Can J Anaesth 1998;45:10–8.
8. Keeler JF, Shah MV, Hansbro SD. Protamine — the need
to determine the dose. Comparison of a simple protamine
titration method with an empirical dose regimen for reversal
of heparinisation following cardiopulmonary bypass.
Anaesthesia 1991;46:925–8.
Shore-Lesserson and colleagues7 compared both heparin
and protamine titration systems to standard weight-based
strategies in 135 patients. Although they could predict a
lower total protamine dose with the titration technique,
this did not result in reduced postoperative bleeding or
improved postoperative hemostasis.
9. Aren C, Feddersen K, Radegran K. Comparison of two
protocols for heparin neutralization by protamine after
cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
1987;94:539–41.
Ottesen’s group18 compared an individual heparin dose-
response curve technique for protamine dosing to a routine
protocol in 20 patients. The dose-response group received
1.18 mg protamine to 1 mg heparin compared to 2 mg in
the control group. They did not find any difference in the
amount of postoperative bleeding.
10. Øvrum E, Lindberg H, Åm Holen E, Abdelnoor M.
Hemodynamic effects of intraaortic versus intravenous
protamine administration after cardiopulmonary bypass in
man. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;26:113–8.
11. Chargaff E, Olson KB. Studies on the chemistry of blood
coagulation. J Biol Chem 1937–38;122:153–67.
In our study, no advantages were observed when the
protamine dose was reduced to 0.75 mg to 1 mg heparin.
All relevant bleeding variables tended to be negatively
affected, and the incidence of allogenic transfusion was
significantly higher. In fact, no reasons could be found to
reduce the protamine dose to less than 1.3 mg to 1 mg
heparin, and it appears safe and convenient to administer
protamine in a single bolus dose.
12. Ellison N, Edmunds LH Jr, Colman RW. Platelet
aggregation following heparin and protamine
administration. Anesthesiology 1978;48:65–8.
13. Ellison N, Ominsky AJ, Wollman H. Is protamine a
clinically important anticoagulant? A negative answer.
Anesthesiology 1971;35:621–9.
14. Perkins HA, Osborn JJ, Hurt R, Gerbode F. Neutralization
of heparin in vivo with protamine. A simple method for
estimating the required dose. J Lab Clin Med 1956;48:
223–6.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We would like to thank Einfrid Åm Holen, MD, former
chief anesthetist, for initiating the study.
15. Inagaki M, Goto K, Katayama H, Benson KT, Goto H,
Arakawa K. Activated partial thromboplastin time–
A
SIAN
C
ARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC
A
NNALS
122
2002, VOL. 10, NO. 2