ChemComm
Communication
In summary, we have described the synthesis of a novel
electroactive polyolefin that exhibits interesting spectroscopic
and electrochromic properties and shown that sequentially
activated intra-chain interactions can be used to fold this
polymer from an expanded coil conformation to a globular
conformation, as is evident through SEC-MALS and DLS char-
acterization. We are continuing to develop these methods in
our lab towards scaling up the amount of folded structures we
make, as well as expanding this technique to a range of other
functional polymers.
We graciously acknowledge NSF for funding via the Nano-
scale Science & Engineering Center for High-rate Nanomanu-
facturing (grant NSF EEC 0832785), as well as start-up funding
from the University of New Hampshire. We also thank Prof.
C. Barner-Kowallik, Prof. T. S. Emrick, and Prof. E.W. Meijer for
helpful and enlightening discussions.
Fig. 2 SEC traces displaying the decrease in hydrodynamic volume with each
sequential folding step. Rh numbers listed are from DLS measurements.
See ESI‡ for full DLS traces.
Notes and references
1 M. Ouchi, N. Badi, J.-F. Lutz and M. Sawamoto, Nat. Chem., 2011, 3,
and incorporation of the requisite comonomer. We surmised
that this method might be possible on a chain synthesized by
olefin metathesis polymerization, simply by taking advantage
of the internal double bond that is present in all ROMP or
ADMET polymers. While these double bonds are typically less
reactive to the thiol–ene chemistry than a terminal olefin,
this method would permit single-chain folding of functional
polymers without specifically designing, synthesizing, and
incorporating a comonomer functionalized for this purpose.
The SEC and DLS results again confirm that this is feasible by
virtue of the observed shifts in retention time and decrease in
Rh (see ESI,‡ Fig. S5).
917–924.
˜
2 M. Aiertza, I. Odriozola, G. Cabanero, H.-J. Grande and I. Loinaz,
Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 2012, 69, 337–346.
3 O. Altintas and C. Barner-Kowollik, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2012,
33, 958–971.
4 I. Perez-Baena, I. Loinaz, D. Padro, I. Garcia, H. J. Grande and
I. Odriozola, J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 6916–6922.
5 S. K. Hamilton and E. Harth, ACS Nano, 2009, 3, 402–410.
6 A. R. d. Luzuriaga, N. Ormategui, H. J. Grande, I. Odriozola,
J. A. Pomposo and I. Loinaz, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2008, 29,
1156–1160.
7 C. T. Adkins, H. Muchalski and E. Harth, Macromolecules, 2009, 41,
5786–5792.
8 T. Terashima, T. Mes, T. F. A. De Greef, M. A. J. Gillissen,
P. Besenius, A. R. A. Palmans and E. W. Meijer, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2011, 4742–4745.
After confirming the effectiveness of each intra-chain
covalent interaction separately, we applied each sequentially
in an attempt to fold the chain in a stepwise fashion. We first
reacted half of the anhydride units in the parent copolymer
with the aniline tetramer pendants. Then, half of the remaining
anhydride groups were reacted with p-aminoaniline, creating
the first round of covalent intramolecular cross-links. This was
followed by the addition of a dithiol to form the second
intrachain covalent interaction. As before, SEC-MALS displays
the expected increase in absolute molecular weight. Shifts to
longer retention time in the SEC traces, in concert with the DLS
data, show a steady decrease in Rh after each folding step (Fig. 2).
It is important to note that each folding step must be done
at low concentration (below c*, or overlap concentration) to
avoid intermolecular cross-linking. This type of chain–chain
coupling is absent in examples presented here based on the
SEC and DLS data (absence of large objects seen in DLS, single
monomodal peaks in the SEC traces) at the concentrations
chosen (1 mg mLÀ1). An unfortunate drawback to this necessity
is that only tiny amounts of folded structures are produced at a
time, thus isolating these materials and characterizing their
bulk properties are particularly challenging. Efforts are currently
underway to scale up this process and fully describe the electro-
active performance of the folded structures.
9 B. S. Murray and D. A. Fulton, Macromolecules, 2011, 7242–7252.
10 M. A. J. Gillissen, I. K. Voets, E. W. Meijer and A. R. A. Palmans,
Polym. Chem, 2012, 3, 3166–3174.
11 E. B. Berda, E. J. Foster and E. W. Meijer, Macromolecules, 2010, 43,
1430–1437.
12 E. J. Foster, E. B. Berda and E. W. Meijer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009,
131, 6964–6966.
13 O. Altintas, E. Lejeune, P. Gerstel and C. Barner-Kowollik, Polym.
Chem., 2012, 3, 640–651.
14 O. Altintas, P. Gerstel, N. Dingenouts and C. Barner-Kowollik, Chem.
Commun., 2010, 46, 6291–6293.
15 B. T. Tuten, D. Chao, C. K. Lyon and E. B. Berda, Polym. Chem., 2012,
3, 3068–3071.
16 M. Zamfir, P. Theato and J.-F. Lutz, Polym. Chem., 2012, 3,
640–651.
17 B. V. K. J. Schmidt, N. Fechler, J. Falkenhagen and J.-F. o. Lutz, Nat.
Chem., 2011, 3, 236–240.
18 T. Mes, R. van der Weegen, A. R. A. Palmans and E. W. Meijer,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 123, 5191–5195.
19 D. Chao, T. Zheng, H. Liu, R. Yang, X. Jia, S. Wang, E. B. Berda and
C. Wang, Electrochim. Acta, 2012, 60, 253–258.
20 D. Chao, R. Yang, X. Jia, H. Liu, S. Wang, C. Wang and E. B. Berda,
J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 2012, 50, 2330–2336.
21 D. Chao, X. Jia, F. Bai, H. Liu, L. Cui, E. B. Berda and C. Wang,
J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 3028–3034.
22 X. Jia, D. Chao, E. B. Berda, S. Pei, H. Liu, T. Zheng and C. Wang,
J. Mater. Chem, 2011, 21, 18317–18324.
23 M. J. Kade, D. J. Burke and C. J. Hawker, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym.
Chem., 2010, 48, 743–750.
24 A. van der Ende, T. Croce, S. Hamilton, V. Sathiyakumar and
E. Harth, Soft Matter, 2009, 5, 1417–1425.
c
4180 Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 4178--4180
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013