Photochemistry and Photobiology, 2007, 83 1437
reactions of these frozen samples. Sample cooling was slow
(ꢀ30 min to reach equilibrium) by way of heat conduction
through the metal framework of the sample holder.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In addition to compound 1, we have now prepared the
o-methylated homolog 2 and the related a-naphthyl analog 3
and examined their photochemical reactions in EPA glass at
liquid nitrogen temperature. The results are shown below.
Low temperature photochemical reactions of 1 were first
reported some time ago (17,18). Photoisomerization in organic
glasses was described. However, formation of the unstable
product conformer(s) was interpreted in terms of the OBF
concept, the only recognized photoisomerization process avail-
able at that time. We have now repeated the low temperature
irradiation of 1 in an EPA glass with progress of reactions
followed by changes of UV absorption spectra. The trans isomer
of 1 (and that of the other two analogs) was found to be
photostable in low temperature glasses. Figure 2 summarizes
results obtained during irradiation of cis-1 in EPA glass at 77 K.
The immediate increase in absorption with a simultaneous
red-shift and the appearance of fine structures (Fig. 2a) is
characteristic of formation of the trans isomer. Upon warming
of the product mixture followed by recooling to 77 K, the
absorption spectrum remained virtually the same (Fig. 2b) (only
minor changes of relative heights of some of the fine vibrational
structures). The obvious conclusion of formation of stable
conformer(s) of the trans isomer (based on UV absorption
spectra) is similar to that reported earlier (based on fluorescence
studies) (14). However, formation of such a stable product(s) is
consistent with any one of the three reaction pathways: OBF
around the double bond, HT of the benzylic C–H unit or HT of
the C–H unit near the naphthyl group if a conformer mixture
similar to that of the trans isomer is obtained.
EXPERIMENTAL
Synthesis
Compounds 1–3 were prepared following standard Wittig
coupling reactions (16) of the corresponding Wittig salt and
arylaldehyde (obtained from Aldrich). In general, the trans
isomer was obtained in slight excess. Conditions for chromato-
graphic separation of the isomers were essentially those des-
cribed (15). The H NMR spectra, obtained on a Nicolet
3
00 MHz spectrometer, were most indicative of the structure
with expected larger vicinal coupling constants for the trans
isomers (ꢀ16 Hz) and smaller coupling constants for the cis
isomers (ꢀ12 Hz). UV spectra were recorded on a Varian 50
spectrometer.
Compound 1. H NMR (acetone-d
t, 2H), 7.40 (d, 1H), 7.43 (d, 1H) (J = 16.2 Hz from a sample
in toluene-d ), 7.48 (m, 2H), 7.65 (d, 2H), 7.86–7.91 (m, 4H),
6
): trans, 7.28 (t, 1H), 7.40
(
8
7
.99 ppm (s, 1H); UV (ether:isopentane:ethanol=5:5:2 [EPA])
max = 223.8, 272.3, 281.8 and 316.9 nm. cis, 6.73 (d, 1H,
k
J = 12.2 Hz), 6.80 (d, 1H, J = 12.1 Hz), 7.20–7.26 (m, 3H),
7.27 (d, 1H), 7.46 (m, 2H), 7.66 (d, 1H), 7.70–7.79 (m, 3H),
7.77 (s, 1H), 7.81–7.86 ppm (m, 1H). UV (EPA) kmax = 225.2,
268.9 and 301.0 nm.
Compound 2. H NMR (acetone-d ): trans, 2.47 (s, 3H), 7.21
6
The slight difference in the relative heights of the finer
structures between 330 and 350 nm is likely due to perturbed
population of the two conformers of the trans isomer from HT
photoisomerization of the two conformers of the cis isomer.
To clarify the situation, we investigated the low temperature
photochemical reaction of homolog 2, in which the additional
(
m, 4H), 7.30 (d, 1H, J = 16.4 Hz), 7.48 (m, 2H), 7.62 (d, 1H,
J = 16.3 Hz), 7.25 (d, 1H), 7.90 (m, 3H), 8.01 ppm (s, 1H);
UV (EPA) kmax = 223.9, 274.9 and 316.0 nm. cis, 2.28 (s, 3H),
6
(
7
(
.78 (d, 1H, J = 12.1 Hz), 6.85 (d, 1H, J = 12.2 Hz), 7.04
t, 1H), 7.11 (d, 1H), 7.18 (d, 1H), 7.17 (d, 1H), 7.22 (d, 1H),
.44 (m, 2H), 7.62 (d, 1H), 7.68 (s, 1H), 7.70 (m, 1H), 7.78 ppm
m, 1H); UV (EPA) kmax = 226.3 and 301.0 nm.
Compound 3. H NMR (acetone-d ): trans, 7.28 (d, 1H,
J = 16.2 Hz), 7.31 (t, 1H), 7.41 (t, 2H), 7.50–7.61 (m, 3H),
.74 (d, 2H), 7.87 (d, 2H), 7.93 (d, 1H), 8.08 (d, 1H,
6
7
J = 16.2 Hz), 8.39 ppm (d, 1H), UV (EPA) kmax = 227.3
and 321.6 nm; cis, 6.90 (d, 1H, J = 12.0 Hz), 7.08 (s, 5H), 7.09
(
2
d, 1H, J = 12.0 Hz), 7.33 (d, 1H), 7.38 (t, 1H), 7.47–7.56 (m,
H), 7.85 (d, 1H), 7.91–7.97 (m, 1H), 8.06–8.09 ppm (m, 1H);
UV (EPA) kmax = 225.5, 267.9 and 310 (sh) nm.
Irradiation Procedure
The Oxford low temperature cell holder (Optistat DN), used in
conjunction with a Varian 50 spectrometer, was the same as
that described before (13,15). A 100 W Xenon Xe–Hg arc
lamp was used as the irradiation light source. Corning O-54
filter was inserted for obtaining light of >310 nm for the more
red-shifted compound 3. Samples were not deoxygenated
because oxygen was found not to have a noticeable effect on
Figure 2. Low temperature photochemistry of 1. (a) Irradiation
(
tane ⁄ ethanol = 5:5:2) in a quartz cell at 77 K showing progressive
changes of UV–Vis absorption spectra; the final spectrum being in
blue. (b) The same final product absorption before (blue solid line) and
after warming to 200 K and recooling to 77 K (red dashed line).
100 W Xe–Hg lamp, no filter) of cis-1 in EPA glass (ether ⁄ isopen-