J. Chil. Chem. Soc., 59, Nº 2 (2014)
(20 °C).
a polymer as brow-red solid was obtained with a yield of 38 %. Elemental
analysis: found % (calculated %): C, 49.27 (60.99); N, 10.91 (14.23); H, 1.9
(3.07); S, 15.31 (21.71). FT-IR (cm-1): 3430.1, 3100.4, 3074.6, 1598, 1520.4,
827.8, 729.8. UV-Vis (nm): 257, 290 and 395.
From UV-Vis spectra of the doped polymers the forbidden energy band
was calculated, following the Born-Einstein energy relationship 6. The frontier
orbital energy HOMO (EHOMO) correlates linearly with the oxidation onset
potential (Eon)ox and it was calculated directly from the voltammograms 10
.
Electrochemical polymerization
Synthesis of monomers
Synthesis of 2,3-di(thiophen-2-yl)quinoxaline (TQ)
Electrochemical polymerizations were carried out following the procedure
previously reported 12
.
The synthetic route of 2,3-di(thiophen-2-yl)quinoxaline was performed
from the procedure previously reported, with 93 % yield 12. A mixture of
2,2’-thenil (200 mg; 0.9 mmol) and o-phenylenediamine (291 mg; 2.7 mmol)
in ethanol was refluxed for 3 h and cooled to room temperature 12. Elemental
analysis, found % (calculated %): C, 65.23 (65.30); H, 3.54 (3.40); N, 9.58
(9.52); S, 21.65 (21.77). Melting point: 146.1-146.6 °C. FTIR (cm-1): 3488.7,
Electropolymerization of 2,3-di(thiophen-2-yl)quinoxaline
The monomer electropolymerization was carried out by 20 successive
voltammetric scans. It was performed in the following conditions: 5.7·10-3
mol·L-1 monomer, 2.2·10-2 mol·L-1 supporting electrolyte (NH4(CH3)4PF ) in
anhydrous acetonitrile. The optimal potential range to polymerize was -60.50
to 1.80 V.
1
3075.5, 1515.9, 1450.9, 1417.5, 836.9, 762.5. H-NMR (CDCI3, 400 MHz,
ppm): 8.01-8.05 (m, 2H, 4,4’-H); 7.75-7.70 (m, 2H, 5,5’- H); 7.51-7.49 (m,
2H, 3,3’-H); 7.27-7.23 (m, 2H, 1,1’-H); 7,06-7,02 (m, 2H, 2,2’-H). UV-Vis
(nm): 257, 274 and 382.
Electropolymerization of 2,3-di(thiophen-2-yl)pyrido[2,3-b]pyrazine
P2,3BP electrosynthesis was carried out by 30 successive voltammetric
scans. It was performed in the following conditions: 5.7·10-3 mol·L-1 monomer,
2.2·10-2 mol·L-1 supporting electrolyte (NH4(CH )4PF6) in anhydrous
acetonitrile. The optimal potential range to polymerize3was -1,0 to 1.5 V.
Synthesis of 2,3-di(thiophen-2-yl)pyrido[2,3-b]pyrazine (2,3BP)
A mixture of 2,2’-thenil (500 mg; 2.26 mmol) and 2,3-diaminepyridine
(1.4 g, 0.128 mol) in ethanol was refluxed until a yellow solid was observed.
The monomer was purified using a silica gel column and hexane : ethyl acetate
mixture as eluent. Product was obtained in a 75 % yield. Elemental analysis,
found % (calculated %): C, 60.85 (60.99); N, 14.29 (14.23); H, 2.54 (3.07); S,
18.98 (21.71). Melting point: 165.3-165.5 °C. FT-IR (cm-1) 3430.8, 3088.4,
Electropolymerization of 2,3-di(thiophen-2-yl)pyrido[3,4-b]pyrazine
P3,4BP electrosynthesis was carried out by 30 successive voltammetric
scans. It was performed in the following conditions: 5.7·10-3 mol·L-1 monomer,
2.2·10-2 mol·L-1 supporting electrolyte (NH4(CH )4PF6) in anhydrous
acetonitrile. The optimal potential range to polymerize3was -1.0 to 1.5 V.
1
1516.3, 1416.7, 845.8, 714.9. H-NMR (CDCI3) 400 MHz, ppm): 9.5 (s, 1H,
6); 8.79 (s, 1H, 4); 7.91-7.89 (d, 1H, 5); 7.60-7.57 (m, 2H, 1,1´); 7.38-7.37(m,
2H, 3,3´); 7.10-7.06 (m, 2H, 2,2´). UV-Vis (nm): 253, 286 and 391.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Synthesis of 2,3-di(thiophen-2-yl)pyrido[3,4-b]pyrazine (3,4BP)
3,4BP was synthetized following the same procedure described above. The
product was obtained in a 81 % of yield. Melting point: 163.9-164.8 °C. FT-IR
(cm-1) 3447.8, 3101.7, 1596.8, 1520.1-1410.7, 829.7, 728.7. 1H-NMR (CDCI )
400 MHz, ppm): 9.39 (s, 1H, 6); 8.68-8.67 (d, 1H, 4); 7.89-7.78 (d, 1H, 53);
7.49-7.47 (t, 2H, 1,1´); 7.28-7.27 (m, 2H, 3,3´); 7.0-6.96 (m, 2H, 2,2´). UV-Vis
(nm): 253, 283 and 390.
Synthesis and characterization of monomers
The synthetic route of all monomers was performed from the procedure
previously reported 12. After 3 h all compounds were quantitatively converted
to product, without by-products.
Chemical polymerization and characterization
All polymerizations afforded low reaction yields, ca. 30 %, considering
just the insoluble fraction or higher molecular weight. Elemental analysis
showed significant variation in the experimental and theoretical percentages,
considering that the polymer in its oxidized state has Fe2+ ions trapped in its
structure (2-3 atoms of Fe per monomer) which justifies the lower concentration
of elements in the actual sample.
The solution UV–Vis absorption spectra for all polymers showed two or
three distinct absorption bands: two or a single band around 250-300 nm can
be assigned to the π-π* transition while a long-wavelength absorption peaks,
around 390 nm, can be attributed to intramolecular charge transfer between
thiophene rings and acceptor moieties 15, 16. The polymers absorption spectra
are red shifted compared to the corresponding monomers spectra (Figure 2),
Chemical Polymerization
All of the polymers were synthesized in chloroform using methodology
previously reported 12. The corresponding polymers were named PTQ, P2,3BT
and P3,4BT, respectively. Each monomer and FeCl3 were dissolved in
chloroform to achieve a molar ratio of FeCl to monomer (4:1), while it was
being stirred at room temperature under a N3 flow during 72 h. The resulting
polymer was washed with water and ethan2ol, and the precipitated is dried
in a vacuum owen. The resulting polymers were compacted into pellets and
weighed. These pellets were then put into open weighing bottles, which were
placed in a small desiccator protected from light and charged with ground iodine
powder. Iodine uptake by the polymers was followed by mass differential.
Doped polymers were dissolved in DMSO to obtain UV-Vis absorption
spectra. This enabled the forbidden energy band of each material to be worked
out.
which can be attributed to an increase in the chain length 17
From UV-Vis spectrum of the doped polymers the forbidden energy band
was calculated, following the Born-Einstein energy relationship . Likewise,
the conductivity of doped polymers was measured; an increase of up to 6 orders
of magnitude compared to the neutral polymers was observed. Comparison
of P2,3BP and P3,4BP with PTQ showed a conductivity increase of about
10 times, which is probably related to the insertion of the nitrogen atom into
the aromatic ring that would confer higher planarity to the polymeric chain,
generating thus improved charge transfer between parallel chains, Table 1.
.
6
Synthesis of poly(2,3-di(2-thenil)quinoxaline) (PTQ)
PTQ was synthesized by following the same procedure explains above.
After purification a brown-red solid was obtained with a yield of 34%.
Elemental analysis, found % (calculated %): C, 54.71 (66,28); N, 14.29 (9,52);
H, 1.82 (3,42); S, 17.15 (21.78). FT-IR (cm-1) 3441.1, 3093.9, 1423.2, 1418,
851.9, 763.4. UV-Vis (nm): 254, 291, 384.
Table 1. Conductivity of the synthesized species and Eg of the doped
polymers.
Synthesis
(P2,3BP)
of
poly(2,3-di(thiophen-2-yl)pyrido[2,3-b]pyrazine)
conductivity (S·cm-1)
polymer
bandgap energy (eV)
P2,3BP was synthesized following the same procedure explains for
chemical polymerization. Additionally the solid was washed twice with ethyl
acetate. After purification a brown-red solid was obtained with a yield of 31
%. Elemental analysis: found % (calculated %): C, 54.71 (60.99); N, 10.91
(14.23); H, 1.9 (3.07); S, 15.31 (21.71). FT-IR (cm-1): 3423.9, 3084.6, 1520,
852.3, 715.3. UV-Vis (nm): 260, 394.
monomer polymer
PTQ
2.0·10-5
3.0·10-10
3.0·10-10
2.4·10-5
1.1·10-4
0.7·10-4
3.05
3.82
3.33
P2,3BP
P3,4BP
Synthesis
(P3,4BP)
of
poly(2,3-di(thiophen-2-yl)pyrido[3,4-b]pyrazine)
P3,4BP was synthesized by the same procedure explains for chemical
polymerization, and the solid was washed with acetonitrile. After purification
2465