Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Paper
J = 13.2 Hz, 2H, ArCH2Ar), 4.29–4.25 (d, J = 18.9 Hz, 2H, 20 μm high, 9 μm long and with a spacing of 12 μm between
ArCH2Ar), 3.49–3.46 (d, J = 13.8 Hz, 4H, ArCH2Ar), 2.75 (s, 1H, the silicon pillars.19
CuCH). Anal. Calc. for C31H26O4: C, 80.50; H, 5.67. Found: C,
Preparation of the Si–N3-modified silicon substrates. Silicon
80.42; H, 5.52%.
substrates cut into 1 cm × 1 cm square pieces were soaked in
The procedure for the synthesis of piperidine-calix[4]arene chromosulfuric acid solution for 30–60 min and then rinsed
(L). C4AM (1.0 mmol) was completely dissolved in THF and with double distilled water and dried under a stream of N2 gas.
then acetic acid (5.0 mmol) was added. Subsequently, piper- The cleaned wafers were immersed in aqueous NaOH
idine (5.0 mmol) was added dropwise into the system. Later, (0.1 mol L−1
) for 6 min and subsequently in HNO3
formaldehyde (5.0 mmol) was added and the mixture was (0.1 mol L−1) for 12 min to generate surface hydroxyl groups.
stirred for 8 h. Finally, complex L was produced. The product After the silicon substrates had been washed with an excess of
was purified by column chromatography (SiO2, ethyl acetate– double distilled water and dried under a stream of N2 flow,
petroleum ether = 2/10) giving a white powder L with a yield of they were immersed in a refluxing solution of 5 wt% Si–N3 in
86%. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO): δ 6.99 (s, 2H, ArH), 6.87–6.79 dry toluene (10 mL) at 110 °C for 6 h. Then they were washed
(d, J = 16.0 Hz, 4H, ArH), 6.71–6.69 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H, ArH), with toluene and ethanol to remove the excess Si–N3 and dried
6.48 (s, 1H, ArH), 4.55 (s, 2H, ArOCH2), 4.47 (d, J = 11.8 Hz, under a stream of N2 gas.
2H, ArCH2Ar), 4.05 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 2H, ArCH2Ar), 3.44 (s, 6H,
The click reaction between Si–N3 and L on the silicon sub-
ArCH2N), 3.13–3.08 (m, 4H, ArCH2Ar), 2.61 (s, 1H, CuCH), strates. The Si–N3-modified silicon surfaces were immersed in
1.53 (m, 20H, (CH2)2N), 1.40–1.01 (m, 10H, (CH2)2N). 13C NMR L solution in ethanol at 10−2 M, then the mixture of copper
(150 MHz, DMSO): δ 156.70, 156.34, 155.59, 135.89, 132.59, sulfate (10−6 M) and sodium ascorbate (10−7 M) were added
132.42, 132.15, 132.07, 131.59, 130.76, 129.51, 124.44, 80.56, into this solution, which was then heated at 75 °C for 8 h.
76.90, 64.04, 63.32, 54.51, 54.34, 49.48, 49.34, 49.13, 49.05, Then the silicon wafer was washed with a little ethanol and
48.91, 35.05, 32.97, 25.55, 25.51, 25.35, 24.53, 24.15. EI (+) MS dried under a stream of N2 gas.
m/z = 753.4 ([M] + 80%) Anal. Calc. for C49H59N3O4: C, 78.05;
H, 7.89; N, 5.57. Found: C, 77.94; H, 7.79; N, 5.43%.
Conflict of interest
3. Fluorescence experiments
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
All experiments of fluorescence cycles were carried out at an
excitation wavelength of 350 nm using a fluorescence spectro-
meter and a 1 cm quartz cell. A bulk solution (1.0 × 10−3 M,
2 mL) of Cys-F was freshly made before each set of experi- Acknowledgements
ments. L solution (1.0 × 10−2 M) was made by dissolving L in
This work was financially supported by the National Natural
CH3CN (1.2 mL). The Hg2+ solutions were made at 1.0 ×
Science Foundation of China (21072072, 21102051), PCSIRT
10−2 M in water (1.2 mL). The fluorescence titrations were
(no. IRTO953), Program for New Century Excellent Talent in
carried out by exciting the solution at 350 nm after adding the
University (NCET-10-0428).
appropriate volume (20 μL) of L solution to measure the fluore-
scence. Then the Hg2+ solution (20 μL) was added to the above
mixed solution to measure the fluorescence, which showed
fluorescence recovery over 6 switching cycles.
Notes and references
1 (a) J. Gutknecht, J. Membr. Biol., 1981, 61, 61;
(b) P. B. Tchounwou, W. K. Ayensu, N. Ninashvili and
D. Sutton, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 2003, 18, 149.
2 W. B. Lu, X. Y. Qin, S. Liu, G. H. Chang, Y. W. Zhang,
Y. L. Luo, A. M. Asiri, A. O. Youbi and X. P. Sun, Anal.
Chem., 2012, 84, 5351.
3 A. K. Mandal, M. Suresh, P. Das, E. Suresh, M. Baidya,
S. K. Ghosh and A. Das, Org. Lett., 2012, 14, 2980.
4 J. S. Wu, I. Hwang, K. S. Kim and J. S. Kim, Org. Lett., 2007,
9, 907.
5 (a) L. Feng, S. H. Li, H. J. Li, J. Zhai, Y. L. Song, L. Jiang and
D. B. Zhu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1221; (b) F. Xia
and L. Jiang, Adv. Mater., 2008, 20, 2842; (c) Y. Guo, F. Xia,
L. Xu, J. Li, W. S. Yang and L. Jiang, Langmuir, 2010, 26,
1024; (d) G. Y. Qing, X. Wang, H. Fuchs and T. L. Sun,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 8370; (e) X. Hong, X. F. Gao
and L. Jiang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 1478.
4. DFT computational details
The calculations reported in this article were performed at the
B3LYP/6-31G(d) level using the Gaussian03 program package.
The compound L (cone) was employed for geometry optimi-
zations, then the complex formed between L and Cys was also
optimized with the B3LYP/6-31G(d) method.
5. Preparation of the Si–N3-modified silicon substrates
Fabrication of the micro–nano Si interface. A silicon wafer
was used directly as the smooth substrate. The structured
silicon substrate was fabricated by the combination of photo-
lithography and inductively coupled plasma (ICP) deep etching
techniques. The photolithography and ICP techniques were
used to obtain the patterned silicon micropillar structure on
the silicon wafer. A rough surface introduced geometrical
structures with patterned square pillars on a flat silicon wafer,
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 8262–8268 | 8267