458
L. Tournier, S. Z. Zard / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 455–459
O
O
In the present case, the two-step addition fragmentation,
combined with the high radicophilicity of the thio-
carbonyl group, results in a very powerful and self-
regulating radical transfer process.
140% DLP
S
O
O
CF3
O
BzCl
reflux
F3C
F3C
S
OEt
O
65%
isomeric ratio: 1/1
13
12
In summary, we have described preliminary results that
expand vastly our previous study. Access to a large vari-
ety of trifluoromethylated structures is now possible
using cheap and readily available starting materials.
Fluorinated compounds are crucially important to the
pharmaceutical and agrochemical industries because of
the profound influence that fluorine atoms have on bio-
logical activity.15
Scheme 5. Dimerisation of xanthate 12.
O
.
O
C11H23
C11H23
H23C11
O
- CO2
OBz
O
S
slow
F3C
S
OEt
Acknowledgements
12
C11H23
OEt
S
OBz
S
S
We wish to thank Rhodia Chimie Fine for generous
financial support to one of us (L.T.) and Drs. Jean-Marc
Paris and Franc¸ois Metz of Rhodia for friendly
discussions.
.
fast
.
H
23C11
+
F3C OBz
S
OEt
12
CF3
OBz
F3C
15
14
OBz
References and notes
CF3
S
OBz
S
F3C
.
OBz
OEt
F3C
1. Gasgoz, F.; Zard, S. Z. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2655–2657.
2. (a) Boivin, J.; Elkaim, L.; Zard, S. Z. Tetrahedron 1995,
51, 2573–2584; (b) Boivin, J.; Elkaim, L.; Zard, S. Z.
Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 2585–2592; (c) Denieul, M. P.;
Quiclet-Sire, B.; Zard, S. Z. Chem. Commun. 1996, 2511–
2513; (d) Quiclet-Sire, B.; Saicic, R. N.; Zard, S. Z.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 9057–9058; (e) Bertrand, F.;
Pevere, V.; Quiclet-Sire, B.; Zard, S. Z. Org. Lett. 2001, 3,
1069–1071.
16
13
Scheme 6. Mechanism for formation of dimer 13.
implications concerning the xanthate transfer process,
which set this method apart from the general Kharasch
type atom or group transfer reactions and explain its
considerable efficiency and generality. As outlined in
Scheme 6, decomposition of dilauroyl peroxide pro-
duces undecyl radicals. These rapidly add to the thiocar-
bonyl group of the xanthate to give 14 and are thus
effectively removed from the medium. The reverse reac-
tion is possible but is slow compared to the fragmenta-
tion that leads to radicals 15, since these are more
stabilised than simple undecyl radicals.
3. (a) Zard, S. Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 672–
684; (b) Quiclet-Sire, B.; Zard, S. Z. Phosphorus, Sulfur,
Silicon 1999, 153–154, 137–154.
4. (a) Grunewald, G. L.; Caldwell, T. M.; Li, Q.; Criscione,
K. R. J. Med. Chem. 1974, 17, 3315–3318; (b) Kawase, M.;
Niwa, M.; Nozaki, M.; Motohashi, N. Heterocycles 1998,
3, 555–560; (c) Wouters, J.; Moureau, F.; Evrard, G.;
Koenig, J.; Jegham, S.; George, P.; Durant, F. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 1999, 7–8, 1683–1686; (d) Benayoud, F.;
Abouabdellah, A.; Richard, C.; Bonnet-Delpon, D.;
Begue, J.; Levasseur, D.; Boutaud, O.; Schuber, F.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 33, 6367–6370; (e) Frey, R.;
Wada, C.; Garland, R.; Curtin, M.; Michaelides, M.; Li,
J.; Pease, L.; Glaser, K.; Marcotte, P.; Bouska, J.;
Murphy, S.; Davidsen, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2002, 12(23), 3443–3447.
Three different radicals thus remain in the medium: rad-
icals 15 as well as tertiary radicals 14 and 16. The last
two are stabilised by three heteroatoms, with no possi-
bility for disproportionation, and are quite hindered.
They do not therefore participate to any significant ex-
tent in radical–radical interactions. This leaves radicals
15 to undergo homo-coupling to give the observed
dimer 13. The presence of the xanthate thus ensures that
very few reactive radicals remain in the medium. These
radicals are stored as 14 or 16 and are liberated accord-
ing to their relative stabilities. A sufficiently high con-
centration of the more stabilised radicals is released to
give homo-dimer 13. Such an automatic regulation of
the concentration of the various radicals according to
their relative stabilities is not as effective in the case
of traditional Kharasch type reactions, where
exchange (usually of halides or chalcogenides) occurs
in one step.
5. (a) Yong, K. H.; Chong, J. M. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4139–
4142; (b) Langlois, B. R.; Billard, T. Synthesis 2003, 185–
´
´
194; (c) Begue, J. P.; Bonnet-Delpon, D. Tetrahedron
1991, 47, 3207–3258; (d) Ruppert, I.; Schlich, K.; Volbach,
W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 2195–2198; (e) Prakash, G.
K. S.; Yudin, A. K. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 757–763; (f)
Prakash, G. K. S.; Krishnamurti, R.; Olah, G. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 393–395; (g) Singh, R. P.; Shreeve,
J. M. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 7613–7624; (h) Singh, R. P.;
Cao, G.; Kirchmeier, R. L.; Shreeve, J. M. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 2873–2876.
6. Synthesis of xanthate 2: to a solution of 2,2,2-trifluoro-1-
methoxy-ethanol (300 mg, 2.31 mmol) in 5 ml of acetone
was added portionwise potassium O-ethylxanthate
(737 mg, 4.62 mmol). The resulting mixture was cooled
at 0 °C and sulfuric acid (123.6 lL, 4.62 mmol) was added